RCU Forums - View Single Post - What do you know about EC expense accounts
Old 05-13-2010 | 03:21 PM
  #48  
wobblyflight
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , GA
Default RE: What do you know about EC expense accounts

It was clear to a lot of us. What part of " What does each member (position) of the EC get for an expense account? do you not understand. The question was answered and yet the discussion continues. Or was the intent of the question to continue to stir the cesspool regardless of the value?

I have to assume you get a bounty for each post opposing a bottom feeder you can zap, but being unable to deactivate my account it will give you something to do.

Red S.




ORIGINAL: RCKen

Ok guys, I'm going to step in here for a second as there seems to be some people taking issues here with this thread. Littlecrankshaf's original post was very clear about what he wanted to discuss

<div id="TixyyLink" style="border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none; overflow: hidden; border-left: medium none; color: #000000; border-bottom: medium none; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none">What does each member (position) of the EC get for an expense account?

A posting member of another AMA forum site stated that $17,000 is allocated for all (collectively speaking) of the VPs and their respective AVPs, yet another responder, that is actually running for Dist X, seemed to indicate $17.000 per each VP and their AVPs. The discrepancy has gone unanswered...Looked through AMA's website and couldn't find the info...

Oh BTW...it really should go without saying... but this is a topic for discussion, so the usual &ldquo;call AMA&rdquo; cry is misplaced here...the intent is for discussion of what the more knowledgeable here know so we can all learn...not just for someone making a call...so, what do you guys know? Anyone???
</div>
I have included his ENTIRE original post because some people seem to want to selectively quote his post, and his intentions. I have highlighted the pertinent parts of his post. It is very clear that he wants to get into a discussion with other members in order to find out WHAT the general AMA public knows on this subject. Yes, he could call AMA to get a definitive answer to his question. However that is not his goal here, he wants to find out how many people in the AMA know the answer. This is an entirely different issue than simply trying to find out the answer to how much is allotted (although I have a suspicion that he already knows what that amount is).

Because of that actions of a few here I'm going to have to step in. If you want to answer "call the AMA" or you want to argue about his motives here then I would suggest that you refrain from posting here, as any more posts along those lines will be removed. However, if you would like to discuss the issue as laid out by the original poster than by all means you are welcome to join in. But the "troll" accusations will stop now.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Ken