RCU Forums - View Single Post - Air sequencer valve vs transmitter programming
Old 06-10-2010 | 11:56 AM
  #7  
DelGatoGrande's Avatar
DelGatoGrande
My Feedback: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
From: ATHENS, , GREECE
Default RE: Air sequencer valve vs transmitter programming

with my 14mz and my 12z when i have chanels left i use them

...when i run out of chanels then i use sequencer .

..at the end of the day both are the same...just with the sequencer you save from one up to two chanels

price...sequencer vs two servos you do the math



...resently i have used for a customers jet the UP valves
and this is what i would like to bring in

...both above ways cant deal with something...if the delay is not good when presure=speed of each system=weels/doors change

for example lowering the retract maybe the doors will close fast and keep a leg in

or when legs retracting up if they are slow they will stay out from the doors.
because UP valve does the sequence michanicly.. if the leg dont go all the way up to give the right presure the door wont close and will wait for it!

on the way down if the leg wont lock all the way the door wont close..


this is more safe and smart...because no matter the speed change at the end all will be done with the right sequence


my 2c


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Tq48676.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	122.5 KB
ID:	1451112