I state that the OS has limitations. I also state that the Perry has limitation. I also state that the baffle engine has limitations. I also said the YS has issue. Now you only take offense to my comments about OS! Really please get some perspective!

I did my development work to over come the limitations (Short comings) of the product to beat you, the competition pilot! Ok, I did most of it so I couldn't blame my engines for not making into the winners circle.

On the OS I I said that they don't hold up in stock form. And in my experience that is very true. I also have a junk drawer or junk to prove it. I also hinted (I don't think I stated out) at the main limitation of the OS the P&L. This is far from the only limitation.

I agree the OS has held some titles where the engine wasn't the dominate factor (important but not dominate) in some subjective competition classes. Elsewhere I have said the OS, in fact any nickel P&L, can't hasn't held a world championship were the engine is dominate in the objective competitions i.e. speed and pylon events.

So, If you have issues with my critiques please bring them forward. But please don't bring you myopic views here. All things have limitation. And yes I will point them out as I see then. Do I see all the limitation? No, but I'm always looking for improvements even if it is an OS!

Friends don't let friends fly nickel,

Konrad

P.S.
Reading my post I see I do give a nod to the Hanno (ok it needs a new set of P&L) and the FSR. Gee, What more do you want? I know blinerders so I can't see the true limitation of products[].