Winglets
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Grimsby, UNITED KINGDOM
ORIGINAL: Aeroengineer1
I currently do not have the link, but researchers at Arizona State University showed that winglets on a small wing did improve performance over the baseline, but also showed that performance degradation with a non-optimized design.
I currently do not have the link, but researchers at Arizona State University showed that winglets on a small wing did improve performance over the baseline, but also showed that performance degradation with a non-optimized design.
Considering the results I saw from the wind tunnel tests I will say it could be applied quite successfully to R/C, one thing thats important though is blending into the aerofoil, if you dont then you MAY loose drag from the winglet effect but get it all back plus some from the increased interference drag.
#28
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Grimsby, UNITED KINGDOM
I havnt got any pics, but I could do a rough sketch.

From the frontal view you can see the blending into the wing, and from the side view you can see the blending into the cross sectional shape towards the front, the back part is big enough that it acts as a half end plate while the front is small enough to not add much weight but it still captures the vortex where it starts to blend towards the back, the tips where quite pointed to reduce weight and drag.
The idea was the vortex would sit on the edge of the winglet throughout appx the first 10 degrees AoA, thats where that blending towards the front comes in.
Because it could be bolted onto a wing that is symetrical aswell it would have equal properties at equal +- AoA values.
Unfortunatly I dont have access to the data from the tests, but from what I can remember (few years back) it was a semi symetrical wing and the peak gain in efficicency vs baseline was about 8% + AoA, and 6% - AoA, although with a symetrical wing that should be equal, probably about 7%, which is about the going rate on winglets.
From the frontal view you can see the blending into the wing, and from the side view you can see the blending into the cross sectional shape towards the front, the back part is big enough that it acts as a half end plate while the front is small enough to not add much weight but it still captures the vortex where it starts to blend towards the back, the tips where quite pointed to reduce weight and drag.
The idea was the vortex would sit on the edge of the winglet throughout appx the first 10 degrees AoA, thats where that blending towards the front comes in.
Because it could be bolted onto a wing that is symetrical aswell it would have equal properties at equal +- AoA values.
Unfortunatly I dont have access to the data from the tests, but from what I can remember (few years back) it was a semi symetrical wing and the peak gain in efficicency vs baseline was about 8% + AoA, and 6% - AoA, although with a symetrical wing that should be equal, probably about 7%, which is about the going rate on winglets.



