Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
 Junkers type control surfaces? >

Junkers type control surfaces?

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Junkers type control surfaces?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2005 | 08:42 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Monterey, TN
Default Junkers type control surfaces?

I am in the process of building a Stuka with the 'exposed' ailerons and flaps. I believe there was also a German tri-motor, WW II vintage, that had the similar surfaces. I'm finishing up a Fiesler 'Storch' which has what I guess you'd call slotted ailerons and flaps. Some Storchs also had a secondary elevator surface mounted below and slightly forward of the elevator. Wondering why these surfaces appeared, and disappeared from the scene? It seems like these were pretty successful for their time-and maybe that's the answer! Interesting design features though. Any thoughts on the subject?
Old 12-01-2005 | 12:37 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: simi valley, CA
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

wsmalley,

Basically a way of creating a more powerful, more aerodynamically balanced, and easier to mass balance, control surface. Gives higher effect while reducing force needed to actuate. Similar to a stabilator horizontal tail, but of course at the cost of more drag. Also vulnerable to airframe icing, a concern for full scale. Will work fine on models. Don’t get the hinge line to far rearward. You want to retain at least some positive feedback. You still see these on some experimental aircraft. The surface attached to the elevator of the storch is a boost tab of sorts. You see smaller versions of this on modern stunt planes to reduce actuation forces. Hope that helps.

Multiflyer
Old 12-01-2005 | 01:54 AM
  #3  
BMatthews's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,432
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
From: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

The trimotor airplane you're reffering to was the Junkers JU-52.

Old 12-01-2005 | 09:17 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Monterey, TN
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

Thanks for the explanation. That should equate to requiring smaller servos than might be expected for 'normal' control actuation. Guess they were the way to go in the 30's!
Old 12-02-2005 | 05:07 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: simi valley, CA
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

That type of control surface is from the time when aircraft were getting larger but hydraulic assist (power steering) wasn't yet used. What designers soon moved to is the conventional control surface with the hing line positioned more rearward. Basically the same result but streamlined. You can still find the other type of surface on some modern designs. For example, if I remember right, the experimental KitFlox ultralight used them?

Multiflyer
Old 12-02-2005 | 09:13 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,925
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Kingston, ON, CANADA
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

These were the first true STOLs. Needed very large control surfaces to give control at very low RE #
Old 12-23-2005 | 05:17 PM
  #7  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jamestown, NY
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

Been there and done that and they were very effective. See my McCessna attached. I static counterbalanced the ailerons with extended fishing sinkers adjustable on music wire supports.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ki20694.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	46.6 KB
ID:	374694   Click image for larger version

Name:	Zu64156.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	8.9 KB
ID:	374695  
Old 12-24-2005 | 11:06 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: simi valley, CA
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

Very nice.

It's tough to get good roll authority on large wing slower flying models. Those type control surface are a great alternative to just making larger normal control surfaces. Plus I really enjoy the extra craftsmanship. In this age of ARFs, you don't see as much home engineering anymore.

Multiflyer
Old 12-24-2005 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jamestown, NY
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

More detail!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw67250.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	11.2 KB
ID:	375090   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ez81615.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	60.8 KB
ID:	375091   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xc79559.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	9.2 KB
ID:	375092  
Old 12-25-2005 | 12:04 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: simi valley, CA
Default RE: Junkers type control surfaces?

Looks like fun. I'd say a true sport flier if there ever was one.

Multiflyer

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.