just what we need
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: howell , MI
[link]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvcN-0PikEU[/link]
Sorry to stir the FAA pot but this video caught my attention. In the video a low flying large scale 3D plane was hovering just off the ground and a low flying biplane struck it causing minor damage to one of the wings but landed safely and now the FAA is investigating it. As far as I know of this is the only reported case of a model aircraft striking a fullsized aircraft. Even though this is clearly the fault of the biplane im pretty sure the FAA is going to point the finger at the model. In my mind the video should have been deleted and the damage on the plane blamed on a birdstrike. In the comments the guy flying the byplane said he attempted to make an aborted landing and struck the model. Im not sure if that is true or not.
Sorry to stir the FAA pot but this video caught my attention. In the video a low flying large scale 3D plane was hovering just off the ground and a low flying biplane struck it causing minor damage to one of the wings but landed safely and now the FAA is investigating it. As far as I know of this is the only reported case of a model aircraft striking a fullsized aircraft. Even though this is clearly the fault of the biplane im pretty sure the FAA is going to point the finger at the model. In my mind the video should have been deleted and the damage on the plane blamed on a birdstrike. In the comments the guy flying the byplane said he attempted to make an aborted landing and struck the model. Im not sure if that is true or not.
#2

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
nibbler,
This has been covered in gross detail on these pages. You should be able to search and find the threads. FAA has given their preliminary report. Th RC pilot took a blame hit. There was a lot of blame to go around. I do not expect this particular event is going to influence the proposed rule making to come from the FAA, but we will not know until it comes out. At the very least, we should learn how not to do it from this video.
Take care out there,
Bedford
This has been covered in gross detail on these pages. You should be able to search and find the threads. FAA has given their preliminary report. Th RC pilot took a blame hit. There was a lot of blame to go around. I do not expect this particular event is going to influence the proposed rule making to come from the FAA, but we will not know until it comes out. At the very least, we should learn how not to do it from this video.
Take care out there,
Bedford
#3
Regardless of whose at fault, nobody should lie about how the damage occurred. Our hobby is safe and well-managed. We do not have to be dishonest on the very rare occasion that something bad happens.
#4

My Feedback: (4)
ORIGINAL: nibbler125
[link]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvcN-0PikEU[/link]
Sorry to stir the FAA pot but this video caught my attention. In the video a low flying large scale 3D plane was hovering just off the ground and a low flying biplane struck it causing minor damage to one of the wings but landed safely and now the FAA is investigating it. As far as I know of this is the only reported case of a model aircraft striking a fullsized aircraft. Even though this is clearly the fault of the biplane im pretty sure the FAA is going to point the finger at the model. In my mind the video should have been deleted and the damage on the plane blamed on a birdstrike. In the comments the guy flying the byplane said he attempted to make an aborted landing and struck the model. Im not sure if that is true or not.
[link]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvcN-0PikEU[/link]
Sorry to stir the FAA pot but this video caught my attention. In the video a low flying large scale 3D plane was hovering just off the ground and a low flying biplane struck it causing minor damage to one of the wings but landed safely and now the FAA is investigating it. As far as I know of this is the only reported case of a model aircraft striking a fullsized aircraft. Even though this is clearly the fault of the biplane im pretty sure the FAA is going to point the finger at the model. In my mind the video should have been deleted and the damage on the plane blamed on a birdstrike. In the comments the guy flying the byplane said he attempted to make an aborted landing and struck the model. Im not sure if that is true or not.
The worst known case was in Germany, a few years back. A large gas powered R/C glider tug collided with a Grop G109 motor sailplane and caused the Grob to crash, killing a father and daughter, as I recall.
The Colorado midair you discussedmhas been investigated by the NTSB and the preliminary findings have long been posted on the NTSB web site.
I agree with the previous poster that this should never be lied about. Besides being unethical, there were tons of spectators and the incident had to be reported to the FAA, per regulation. Trying to sweep it under the rug woudl have been counterproductive.
And you hve the detaisl wrong about the landing...do a search and you will find information closer to the truth.



