AMA emails on Drones/Right to Fly
#251
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: sheridan,
IN
Heck, I'm constantly worried some fed is gonna try to set me up on a bum terrorist rap.
I mean, if it could happen to someone selling cellphone IEDs to FBI undercover ops.,
it could happen to anyone.[X(]
I mean, if it could happen to someone selling cellphone IEDs to FBI undercover ops.,
it could happen to anyone.[X(]
#252
ORIGINAL: 804
Heck, I'm constantly worried some fed is gonna try to set me up on a bum terrorist rap.
I mean, if it could happen to someone selling cellphone IEDs to FBI undercover ops.,
it could happen to anyone.[X(]
Heck, I'm constantly worried some fed is gonna try to set me up on a bum terrorist rap.
I mean, if it could happen to someone selling cellphone IEDs to FBI undercover ops.,
it could happen to anyone.[X(]
#253
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Yep...cell phones should be outlawed before this kind of thing gets out of hand!!!
ORIGINAL: 804
Heck, I'm constantly worried some fed is gonna try to set me up on a bum terrorist rap.
I mean, if it could happen to someone selling cellphone IEDs to FBI undercover ops.,
it could happen to anyone.[X(]
Heck, I'm constantly worried some fed is gonna try to set me up on a bum terrorist rap.
I mean, if it could happen to someone selling cellphone IEDs to FBI undercover ops.,
it could happen to anyone.[X(]
#254

My Feedback: (49)
<h1>U.S. Troops Will Soon Get Tiny Kamikaze Drone</h1>
This is a little more than drone servalence
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011...amikaze-drone/
This is a little more than drone servalence
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011...amikaze-drone/
#255
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style="font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
</div><div><span style="font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
#256
ORIGINAL: bradpaul
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
#257
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Although interesting, nothing really new and the video in that link falls short of what is capable. Over thirty years ago I told people about how this type of technology would be a game changer...Of course most people couldn't get their mind around the concept and could only argue or laugh...and we haven't seen anything yet compared to what's coming...
ORIGINAL: bradpaul
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
#258
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I dont think we have seen anything of whats coming for these to be used for the wrong thing yet either! joe
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Although interesting, nothing really new and the video in that link falls short of what is capable. Over thirty years ago I told people about how this type of technology would be a game changer...Of course most people couldn't get their mind around the concept and could only argue or laugh...and we haven't seen anything yet compared to what's coming...
ORIGINAL: bradpaul
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
#259
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Yea, but it won't be by any of us hobbyists and that is the important thing to keep in mind!!! I AGREE
joe
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I dont think we have seen anything of whats coming for these to be used for the wrong thing yet either! joe
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
Although interesting, nothing really new and the video in that link falls short of what is capable. Over thirty years ago I told people about how this type of technology would be a game changer...Of course most people couldn't get their mind around the concept and could only argue or laugh...and we haven't seen anything yet compared to what's coming...
ORIGINAL: bradpaul
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
More fuel to the fire............. killer micro drones.<div>
</div><div><span style=''font-family: '.HelveticaNeueUI'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 19px; white-space: nowrap; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ''>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html</span></div>
joe
#262

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aguanga,
CA
ORIGINAL: joebahl
Here is a noob thats flying his over 700 ft naaaaaa nothing could go wrong here ! http://vimeo.com/52481958
Here is a noob thats flying his over 700 ft naaaaaa nothing could go wrong here ! http://vimeo.com/52481958
#263
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
BTW If it hits a full size aircraft and films it ,do you think the FAA will send a copy and a thank you note to the AMA.
joe
BTW If it hits a full size aircraft and films it ,do you think the FAA will send a copy and a thank you note to the AMA.
joe
#264
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
joe
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
joe
#265
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
That's FAA's choice and while you might be right, with the ever increasing chances of near future FAA cuts I doubt much will ever be done... The FAA is super busy maintaining its wasteful or redundant oversights as it is now...
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
joe
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
joe
#266

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aguanga,
CA
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
BTW If it hits a full size aircraft and films it ,do you think the FAA will send a copy and a thank you note to the AMA.
joe
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
BTW If it hits a full size aircraft and films it ,do you think the FAA will send a copy and a thank you note to the AMA.
joe
Maybe they would inquire as to why the full size aircraft was at 700' ...........the camera shows a populated area below and capture of the models flight profile via the OSD data downlinked with the video (common part of many FPV packages) is proof of the altitude where the hypothetical incident occurred.
Model was a bit more than 1/2 mile away when the r/c link failed and rx went into failsafe, but Return To Home (RTH on the screen) capability brought the model back safely. Can yours do that? At 1/2 m. it would still have been within unaided visual range, even with my sub-par eyes.
What's wrong with this flight except for the altitude question? How high would AMA rules allow him to fly?
#267
I don't think the FAA will be the problem as much as local government. Any city can write ordinances against FPV, or model aircraft for that matter, within their city limits.
#268
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: cj_rumley
Dunno how FAA would react.
Maybe they would inquire as to why the full size aircraft was at 700' ...........the camera shows a populated area below and capture of the models flight profile via the OSD data downlinked with the video (common part of many FPV packages) is proof of the altitude where the hypothetical incident occurred.
Model was a bit more than 1/2 mile away when the r/c link failed and rx went into failsafe, but Return To Home (RTH on the screen) capability brought the model back safely. Can yours do that? At 1/2 m. it would still have been within unaided visual range, even with my sub-par eyes.
What's wrong with this flight except for the altitude question? How high would AMA rules allow him to fly?
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
BTW If it hits a full size aircraft and films it ,do you think the FAA will send a copy and a thank you note to the AMA.
joe
I dont know if he is a ama member or not but u-tube is full of them trying to fly further and higher than the last one . It wont be very long before FAA starts to spanky spanky .
BTW If it hits a full size aircraft and films it ,do you think the FAA will send a copy and a thank you note to the AMA.
joe
Maybe they would inquire as to why the full size aircraft was at 700' ...........the camera shows a populated area below and capture of the models flight profile via the OSD data downlinked with the video (common part of many FPV packages) is proof of the altitude where the hypothetical incident occurred.
Model was a bit more than 1/2 mile away when the r/c link failed and rx went into failsafe, but Return To Home (RTH on the screen) capability brought the model back safely. Can yours do that? At 1/2 m. it would still have been within unaided visual range, even with my sub-par eyes.
What's wrong with this flight except for the altitude question? How high would AMA rules allow him to fly?
#269
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I think the ones that are just out flying with no AMA rules are going to cause problems .
I think the ones that are just out flying with no AMA rules are going to cause problems .
#270

My Feedback: (49)
<h3><font size="4">Paste this into Google Maps and see where that FPV plane was about </font>8 miles North of Asheville NC 35.683102 -82.540998 Latitude and Longitude are in the lower left and lower right of the screen<br type="_moz"/></h3>
#271

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aguanga,
CA
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I think FAA has full size aircraft at 400 ft and above and rc at 300 and lower but i think its a close guess. joe
I think FAA has full size aircraft at 400 ft and above and rc at 300 and lower but i think its a close guess. joe
FAA says models should not fly above 400' anywhere. AMA says they should be allowed to fly above 400' but does not say how much higher. It may be stated in AMA safety rules submitted to FAA last October, but we hoi polloi members are not privy to that. Reason for that stated here, an excerpt from minutes of AMA EC meeting Jan '03:
• Mathewson passed around a document that was put together by HQ staff. At the beginning of the year AMA presented its support materials in request for the FAA to recognize AMA as a Community Based Organization (CBO). That included the safety program that Council saw at the October 2012 meeting and another book that was an effort of R. Hanson’s team and the AMA Staff. Putting this book together turned into a 2-week project and Mathewson recognized Chris Savage for his working nights and weekends, including Christmas Eve and Christmas, so AMA could have the book to the FAA before the end of the year (2012). Once the book is finalized each Council member will receive a copy
• The ED commented on the membership numbers year-to-date; compared to last year we are down .8% in overall membership 2013 compared to 2012 YTD. HQ discovered an anomaly in District II that was believed to be a result of Super Storm Sandy. In comparison to national numbers (Open down .8%; Sr. Citizen up 1-2%), District II Open members were down 13%; Sr. Citizen down 1-2%. The ED and District II VP will investigate opportunities to reach out to those members
• The ED requested feedback on copyrighting AMA material. A ballpark cost for copyrighting the two books (safety program and support material book presented to FAA) would be less than $500 each. Making minor changes to the copyrighted books would not require application for a new copyright. It was suggested that AMA copyright all of its’ PDF documents; these do not have to be ‘registered copyright’ but could contain a statement that AMA created the document and is the owner. The two books are now out of AMA’s control and it is important to get them copyrighted so other organizations can’t purport them as their own
MOTION I: Moved by E. Williams (II) and seconded by M. Radcliff (III) all documents in the CBO proposal will be registered for copyright. All other publically available AMA documents will be evaluated for the purpose of application of non-registered copyright.
MOTION passed unanimously
• The ED commented on the membership numbers year-to-date; compared to last year we are down .8% in overall membership 2013 compared to 2012 YTD. HQ discovered an anomaly in District II that was believed to be a result of Super Storm Sandy. In comparison to national numbers (Open down .8%; Sr. Citizen up 1-2%), District II Open members were down 13%; Sr. Citizen down 1-2%. The ED and District II VP will investigate opportunities to reach out to those members
• The ED requested feedback on copyrighting AMA material. A ballpark cost for copyrighting the two books (safety program and support material book presented to FAA) would be less than $500 each. Making minor changes to the copyrighted books would not require application for a new copyright. It was suggested that AMA copyright all of its’ PDF documents; these do not have to be ‘registered copyright’ but could contain a statement that AMA created the document and is the owner. The two books are now out of AMA’s control and it is important to get them copyrighted so other organizations can’t purport them as their own
MOTION I: Moved by E. Williams (II) and seconded by M. Radcliff (III) all documents in the CBO proposal will be registered for copyright. All other publically available AMA documents will be evaluated for the purpose of application of non-registered copyright.
MOTION passed unanimously
The (presumed) non-AMA FPV flyer used common sense and came up a plan that would allow him to operate safely. The guy that needs AMA rules because he lacks common sense, and the rule makers seem to presume that is the norm, well............what can I say?.
#272
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
WOW!!! How do you come up with such stuff??? I would've guessed you knew that there have been people flying models ever since models have been flying without AMA... I was wrong... I guess you must feel model aviation will cease real soon, maybe tomorrow, since you now know the truth now.
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I think the ones that are just out flying with no AMA rules are going to cause problems .
I think the ones that are just out flying with no AMA rules are going to cause problems .
joe
#273

My Feedback: (49)
<font size="4">The craft in the video never got within 100 feet of 700 <font size="4">AGL at 1:37 into the flight it hit 582 A<font size="4">GL and it's highest point 583 AGL<font size="4"> until 1:57 into the flight
<font size="4">
The Approach altitude for <font size="4">A<font size="4">sheville approaches </font></font></font></font></font></font></font><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4">RNAV (GPS) RWY 1 or</font></font></font></font></font></font></font>
ILS or LOC RWY 1 have vectoring altitudes of 5000' msl about 2700' AGL. All VFR aircraft would/should not be below pattern altitude for Ashevill airport witch is 1000' AGL
I fly with GPS in 4 of my planes HiTec Aurora 9 and believe me 400 feet is not very high most pattern and Imac guys exceed that regularly, not to say what the Turbines do for Altitude.
<font size="4">
The Approach altitude for <font size="4">A<font size="4">sheville approaches </font></font></font></font></font></font></font><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4"><font size="4">RNAV (GPS) RWY 1 or</font></font></font></font></font></font></font>
ILS or LOC RWY 1 have vectoring altitudes of 5000' msl about 2700' AGL. All VFR aircraft would/should not be below pattern altitude for Ashevill airport witch is 1000' AGL
I fly with GPS in 4 of my planes HiTec Aurora 9 and believe me 400 feet is not very high most pattern and Imac guys exceed that regularly, not to say what the Turbines do for Altitude.
#274

My Feedback: (20)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Frederick, CO
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
WOW!!! How do you come up with such stuff??? I would've guessed you knew that there have been people flying models ever since models have been flying without AMA... I was wrong... I guess you must feel model aviation will cease real soon, maybe tomorrow, since you now know the truth now.
ORIGINAL: joebahl
I think the ones that are just out flying with no AMA rules are going to cause problems .
I think the ones that are just out flying with no AMA rules are going to cause problems .
there is only two reasons I have AMA
one is to be in a local club, and two I get killer deals at my LHS with it
other than that, AMA really does nothing that I'm aware of for me [:-]
because unless I am at a AMA event I have no coverage
#275
ORIGINAL: joebahl
Here is a noob thats flying his over 700 ft naaaaaa nothing could go wrong here ! http://vimeo.com/52481958
Here is a noob thats flying his over 700 ft naaaaaa nothing could go wrong here ! http://vimeo.com/52481958



