Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > AMA Discussions
How Much Damage? (part 2) >

How Much Damage? (part 2)

Community
Search
Notices
AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.
View Poll Results: How Much Damage (part 2)
No damage
0
0%
Minor damage not causing a loss of power
9.09%
Major damage causing loss of power and/or possible engine shut down.
90.91%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

How Much Damage? (part 2)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2015 | 03:23 PM
  #1  
bradpaul's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Apopka, FL
Question How Much Damage? (part 2)

There has been much discussion in these forums about RC aircraft and near misses with commercial airliners and questioning of how much damage could a 60 sized RC airplane cause to an airliner. For this poll let’s consider an airliner at approach speed on final about 7 miles out at 2500ft. A typical, 60 size airplane at approximately 4 lbs. is ingested in one of the turbofan engines. Would there be:

A: No damage
B: Minor damage not causing a loss of power
C: Major damage causing loss of power and/or possible engine shut down.

Brad
Old 04-14-2015 | 03:47 PM
  #2  
804
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sheridan, IN
Default

D: Hell to pay.
Old 04-14-2015 | 07:30 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,249
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Maricopa County AZ
Default

I dont think it would be no damage, But it could either B or C but I don't think many 60 size models are flown at 2500 ft but with FPV technology I guess anything is possible.
Old 04-14-2015 | 10:11 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: valley springs, CA
Default

Aircraft - Beechcraft D-18S. RC airplane - Alpha 60 ARF. B-18 was at 50 feet conducting a go - around at about 120 knots when it met head on with the rc aircraft. The rc impacted the propeller blade and entered the front of the 985 P&W destroying several pushrods resulting in a partial power loss and massive oil loss. The engine was immediately feathered and the airplane successfully landed. Damage was over 33,000 dollars. A 10 pound airplane could easily cause a airplane to crash. Any engine damage to oil, fuel and other exposed engine components will likely result in a fire and powerplant failure. A cockpit hit would be devastating. Any damage to the primary control system would be lethal. Wouldn't matter if it was a rc helicopter, drone or quad.
Old 04-15-2015 | 05:27 AM
  #5  
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Acworth, GA
Default

I voted minor damage, but actually I believe it would be moderate to heavy with partial loss of power.
Old 04-15-2015 | 06:09 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (209)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: right here
Default

Brad: I voted for major damage , and yes the engine will shut down. When an object is induced into the impeller blades, it will fracture a few blades, then those blades compound the problem fracturing more blades. You end up with with an implosion in the engine.
Old 04-15-2015 | 06:22 AM
  #7  
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Acworth, GA
Default

Originally Posted by FLAPHappy
Brad: I voted for major damage , and yes the engine will shut down. When an object is induced into the impeller blades, it will fracture a few blades, then those blades compound the problem fracturing more blades. You end up with with an implosion in the engine.
Engines are tested with 8 pound birds so I doubt it. Most of the fan blades may go through the bypass and not damage the power turbine so likely only a loss of power from vibration of main fan blade and no damage to compressor blades. Though your scenario is possible (random odds on this), even the turbine can injest a few blades and keep running, but then the power would be real low.
Old 04-15-2015 | 06:25 AM
  #8  
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: here
Default

Originally Posted by robert waldo
Aircraft - Beechcraft D-18S. RC airplane - Alpha 60 ARF. B-18 was at 50 feet conducting a go - around at about 120 knots when it met head on with the rc aircraft. The rc impacted the propeller blade and entered the front of the 985 P&W destroying several pushrods resulting in a partial power loss and massive oil loss. The engine was immediately feathered and the airplane successfully landed. Damage was over 33,000 dollars. A 10 pound airplane could easily cause a airplane to crash. Any engine damage to oil, fuel and other exposed engine components will likely result in a fire and powerplant failure. A cockpit hit would be devastating. Any damage to the primary control system would be lethal. Wouldn't matter if it was a rc helicopter, drone or quad.
Thanks for the real life account. There is so much to learn from just that one post. I hope people take heed and quit all the silliness that seems so prevalent nowadays.
Old 04-15-2015 | 06:49 AM
  #9  
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Acworth, GA
Default

Yes, especially for the smaller planes a hit could be devastating or a non event. But the odds are that it would be devastating. But this poll was about an airliner, and a head exercise not a safety warning.
Old 04-15-2015 | 07:47 AM
  #10  
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: here
Default

Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
Yes, especially for the smaller planes a hit could be devastating or a non event. But the odds are that it would be devastating. But this poll was about an airliner, and a head exercise not a safety warning.
One thing is exceedingly clear, nothing good can come from putting our models in front of full scale aircraft.
Old 04-15-2015 | 09:32 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,249
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Maricopa County AZ
Default

No one can say for sure what would happen in every case but i'm sure the engine would need some repair to the tune of thousands of dollars even if it did not lose power at all.
Old 04-15-2015 | 10:05 AM
  #12  
bradpaul's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Apopka, FL
Default

What is the message here? "See and Avoid" for whatever kind of RC model: airplane, glider, helicopter, multi-rotor, turbine, EDF and whatever way you control it, conventional Visual Line of Sight, or FPV is the solution......................

Those that are trying to make model to full scale collisions a quad-copter only issue are ignorant.

See and Avoid, See and Avoid, See and avoid.......................
'see
Old 04-15-2015 | 11:16 AM
  #13  
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Acworth, GA
Default

Another point, we talk about airliners, but the most likely scenario is a small plane or helicopter flying low over the flying field. Doesn't matter if they are breaking the rules. GET OUT OF THE WAY.
Old 04-15-2015 | 02:54 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by bradpaul
There has been much discussion in these forums about RC aircraft and near misses with commercial airliners and questioning of how much damage could a 60 sized RC airplane cause to an airliner. For this poll let’s consider an airliner at approach speed on final about 7 miles out at 2500ft. A typical, 60 size airplane at approximately 4 lbs. is ingested in one of the turbofan engines. Would there be:

A: No damage
B: Minor damage not causing a loss of power
C: Major damage causing loss of power and/or possible engine shut down.

Brad
I voted there will be major damage causing loss of power and/or possible shut down. But actually I'd like to comment further and say that a 60 sized airplane would be ripped to shreds if it went through a turbofan. I don't see how it could survive. The .60 sized engine would not only shut down, it would be damaged beyond repair. I certainly wouldn't buy it even if someone did repair it ... No matter how much JB Weld was used to glue it together!!

Nor would I buy the servos, or the plane! All the glue used to repair the plane would make it too heavy to fly again ... even with a .90 engine.

Last edited by BobbyMcGee; 04-16-2015 at 01:49 AM.
Old 04-15-2015 | 02:59 PM
  #15  
My Feedback: (209)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: right here
Default

Originally Posted by bradpaul
What is the message here? "See and Avoid" for whatever kind of RC model: airplane, glider, helicopter, multi-rotor, turbine, EDF and whatever way you control it, conventional Visual Line of Sight, or FPV is the solution......................

Those that are trying to make model to full scale collisions a quad-copter only issue are ignorant.

See and Avoid, See and Avoid, See and avoid.......................
'see
Brad: it is a real possibility for a quad copter to come in contact with a full scale aircraft. Some of these people do not know of the 3 mile rule, and are new people to this hobby. They are the people that are dangerous, because they don't know the AMA even exists, much less FAA Regs. It has not happened yet, and I hope it never doe's.
Old 04-15-2015 | 06:28 PM
  #16  
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: walla walla, WA
Default

Back in about 1984 I was in a Citabria and we hit a falcon 56.. it caved in 4 feet of the leading edge all the way back to the spar just outboard of strut attachment. We were at 1000ft agl and the model pilot didn't think we were anywhere close to hitting.
Old 04-16-2015 | 12:10 AM
  #17  
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,629
Received 139 Likes on 132 Posts
From: Marysville, WA
Default

Two fast points:
1) The FAA/AMA set the 400ft ceiling for one simple reason, full sized helicopters are required to maintain a minimum altitude of 500 feet, a fixed wing aircraft 1000. The 100ft difference is a buffer to prevent the a collision like 2walla just described. If 2walla is correct in how high the Citabria was flying, the Falcon was at fault for being 600ft above where he should have been and, therefore, the Falcon's pilot should have been required to at least pay for all repairs to the Citabria.
2) The clearance between the fan tips and shroud on a turbine engine is only A FEW THOUSANTHS OF AN INCH. If one blade is broken, the fan is unbalanced and will start hitting the shroud. This will cause the remaining blades to break, destroying the engine. If the engine is a twin spool, the interior compressor blades COULD be fine and keep running while the fan disintegrates which could, under the right conditions, give no indication of engine damage in the cockpit.
Old 04-16-2015 | 07:27 AM
  #18  
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: here
Default

Originally Posted by 2walla
Back in about 1984 I was in a Citabria and we hit a falcon 56.. it caved in 4 feet of the leading edge all the way back to the spar just outboard of strut attachment. We were at 1000ft agl and the model pilot didn't think we were anywhere close to hitting.
Yet another real life account of a model airplane hitting a full scale...thanks for sharing! Glad you made it back to the ground OK.

Hard to imagine someone flying a model in any way that might interfere with full scale but it does happen and unfortunately it will continue to happen. I hope the idiot flying the model airplane was held fully accountable...Maybe he was an AMA member and only had to worry whether our insurance would cover him financially or not... Hmmm....
Old 04-16-2015 | 08:38 AM
  #19  
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Acworth, GA
Default

So you were missing 4 foot of wing to the spar? Or do you mean the width of the model back 4 feet which was to the spar?
Old 04-17-2015 | 02:15 AM
  #20  
phlpsfrnk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spring Hill, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
So you were missing 4 foot of wing to the spar? Or do you mean the width of the model back 4 feet which was to the spar?
My guess would be that he meant to say 4 inches vice feet. I believe Citabria cords run 56", 63" and 66" depending on year/model. Pictured is a Citabria wing after conversion to a metal spar wing.



Frank
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Rob%20and%20Poly%20Tak.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	46.5 KB
ID:	2089797  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.