UAS Registration Update ?
#1
Anybody else get the Email from the FAA under the heading of "UAS Registration Update" and open it to find it's actually a warning to stay outta the way of operations during hurricane Matthew ? Maybe it's me , but I don't consider a warning to stay out of a potential disaster area to be any kinds of an "update" to my UAS registration in any way and the misleading title almost got it deleted as spam/scam .
FAA - 1
FAA - 1
#2
Anybody else get the Email from the FAA under the heading of "UAS Registration Update" and open it to find it's actually a warning to stay outta the way of operations during hurricane Matthew ? Maybe it's me , but I don't consider a warning to stay out of a potential disaster area to be any kinds of an "update" to my UAS registration in any way and the misleading title almost got it deleted as spam/scam .
FAA - 1
FAA - 1Kinda stupid IMO
Mike
#3
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Unfortunately the "warning" is going to the ones who don't really need warnings about not doing stupid things.. Now the morons who have caused this whole mess with the Feds in the first place will continue to be morons and never got the FAA Update in the first place or even care for that matter.
Kinda stupid IMO
Mike
Kinda stupid IMO
Mike
#4

My Feedback: (1)
Originally Posted by porcia83
What was Pirker flying again?
Astro
#5
In case anyone has any , , , trouble , figuring out what this thread is about . Some may try to play it off as a slap at the warning itself , as is typical of those with agendas to push , but the real premise of the thread is ; Just why would a warning to stay out of a disaster area be sent under the heading of being an "Update" to someone's "UAS Registration" ? Can anyone without an agenda explain how , what should be a simple TFR is instead sent as being an "Update to UAS Registration" ?
#7
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
The "cost" of shooting out some e-mails based on a database of users is at best, nominal, and certainly a far cry from more wasteful things they do. Seems like this would be one of those damned if they do, damned if they don't situations though. If they didn't do this and someone flew and caused an issue, I'm fairly certain we'd see a -1 for the FAA for failing to issue a warning, didn't do their job and they should have because some of us paid $5.00 for a registration...etc etc etc.
#8
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
In case anyone has any , , , trouble , figuring out what this thread is about . Some may try to play it off as a slap at the warning itself , as is typical of those with agendas to push , but the real premise of the thread is ; Just why would a warning to stay out of a disaster area be sent under the heading of being an "Update" to someone's "UAS Registration" ? Can anyone without an agenda explain how , what should be a simple TFR is instead sent as being an "Update to UAS Registration" ?
Seems pedantic to focus in on the work "update" versus "TFR". At the end of the day, does it take away from the message/warning they are sending?
#9

My Feedback: (1)
Not sure what the alleged agenda thing is all about...just the new catch phrase I guess. Not sure what your reference is to "what should be a simple TFR"...since when does the FAA issue TFRs for bad weather? It's a moving weather system. Although some limited instances of natural disasters could result in a TFR, it's not commonly used.
Seems pedantic to focus in on the work "update" versus "TFR". At the end of the day, does it take away from the message/warning they are sending?
Seems pedantic to focus in on the work "update" versus "TFR". At the end of the day, does it take away from the message/warning they are sending?
Astro
Last edited by astrohog; 10-06-2016 at 07:49 PM.
#10

My Feedback: (1)
Originally Posted by porcia83
As for e-mail, no, actually it's not free. The e-mail fairy doesn't exist anymore,
Funny how your "opinion" and tone changes depending on which side of the fence you happen to be on from one day to the next!!
You are a real piece of work!
Regards,
Astro
#12
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Now I'm being criticized for being flexible or having a different opinion than others. Go figure.
By all means...share the hard and fast numbers of what it costs to send out the e-mails. It will be the new outrage of the week, the FAA's very own lapel pin and adorned shirt fiasco. Got a link? A source? Actual experience, or just more.....argument?
#17
Mike
#18

My Feedback: (1)
Yes. You ae an AMA fanboi You want to "be" somebody and you found it easy to do by bloviating on internet forums, and rattling the cages of all who do not follow in-line with your beliefs. .Learned that all within the first couple of dances with you. It's really quite transparent.
Criticized for your opinion? No, you are being called out for your spin. One day, e-mails are not free, "the e-mail fairy doesn't exist anymore" and the next they are "nominal, at best". LOL I guess the e-mail fairy has returned??
Spin and deflection. I was the one that said sending e=mails was a cheap, effective way to reach membership. YOU came at me with the e-mail fairy comment, NOW you defend sending e-mails because of their "nominal" cost and infer that I want to start an "outrage" of the week?
Quit spinning Porcia, You are just dragging these threads to new lows. Take your drama elsewhere......
Astro
Originally Posted by porcia83
Now I'm being criticized for being flexible or having a different opinion than others. Go figure.
Originally Posted by porcia83
By all means...share the hard and fast numbers of what it costs to send out the e-mails. It will be the new outrage of the week,
Quit spinning Porcia, You are just dragging these threads to new lows. Take your drama elsewhere......
Astro
#19
Mike
#21
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Yes. You ae an AMA fanboi You want to "be" somebody and you found it easy to do by bloviating on internet forums, and rattling the cages of all who do not follow in-line with your beliefs. .Learned that all within the first couple of dances with you. It's really quite transparent.
Criticized for your opinion? No, you are being called out for your spin. One day, e-mails are not free, "the e-mail fairy doesn't exist anymore" and the next they are "nominal, at best". LOL I guess the e-mail fairy has returned??
Spin and deflection. I was the one that said sending e=mails was a cheap, effective way to reach membership. YOU came at me with the e-mail fairy comment, NOW you defend sending e-mails because of their "nominal" cost and infer that I want to start an "outrage" of the week?
Quit spinning Porcia, You are just dragging these threads to new lows. Take your drama elsewhere......
Astro
Criticized for your opinion? No, you are being called out for your spin. One day, e-mails are not free, "the e-mail fairy doesn't exist anymore" and the next they are "nominal, at best". LOL I guess the e-mail fairy has returned??
Spin and deflection. I was the one that said sending e=mails was a cheap, effective way to reach membership. YOU came at me with the e-mail fairy comment, NOW you defend sending e-mails because of their "nominal" cost and infer that I want to start an "outrage" of the week?
Quit spinning Porcia, You are just dragging these threads to new lows. Take your drama elsewhere......
Astro
#24
So , as a recap ;
FAA sending warning = good
FAA using wrong Email title on warning = bad
I hope this clears up any "confusion" anybody may still have about the topic of this thread ..



