AMA / MAAC reciprocal agreement ends......
#51
My Feedback: (29)
LOL, says the man that snuck back into a forum where he had previously been banned and then lied about his career. Unless you’re going to try to convince us that you went from flight status to stock boy at the base PX.
of course that would conflict with the career path you claim in this statement where you decide you needed to argue with someone over the flap configuration on his toy airplane.
( Quote Franklin_M) Who was also a NATOPS Instructor in type, Naval Aviation Safety School graduate (i.e. aviation safety expert & mishap investigator), developmental test pilot, and developmental test pilot instructor.
I'm baffled why he's clinging to nomenclature and misunderstanding of the aircraft despite ample primary source document (NATOPS) proof to the contrary. I think it comes down to effort to capture scale builders. For example, he knows the model's flaps aren't accurate (split vs. semi-Fowler), but if he can find documentation somewhere saying they're split, even if he knows it's wrong, then he can tell customers can submit that incorrect info for scale documentation.
__________________
" If at first you don't succeed....
then carrier landings are not for you! "
........FLY NAVY
of course that would conflict with the career path you claim in this statement where you decide you needed to argue with someone over the flap configuration on his toy airplane.
( Quote Franklin_M) Who was also a NATOPS Instructor in type, Naval Aviation Safety School graduate (i.e. aviation safety expert & mishap investigator), developmental test pilot, and developmental test pilot instructor.
I'm baffled why he's clinging to nomenclature and misunderstanding of the aircraft despite ample primary source document (NATOPS) proof to the contrary. I think it comes down to effort to capture scale builders. For example, he knows the model's flaps aren't accurate (split vs. semi-Fowler), but if he can find documentation somewhere saying they're split, even if he knows it's wrong, then he can tell customers can submit that incorrect info for scale documentation.
__________________
" If at first you don't succeed....
then carrier landings are not for you! "
........FLY NAVY
#53
My Feedback: (1)
Dude. REALLY? "crossed over"? I've been over there far longer than you, hence my delusional comment. You can write as many words as you want, it just doesn't make them true.
You are truly narcissistic.
Why must you continue with the vitriol of name-calling and pigs making turds stuff? very childish. It certainly doesn't give you the upper hand, rather it shows your true childish colors. Respect is earned, and it certainly isn't earned by playing childish games.
Astro
You are truly narcissistic.
Why must you continue with the vitriol of name-calling and pigs making turds stuff? very childish. It certainly doesn't give you the upper hand, rather it shows your true childish colors. Respect is earned, and it certainly isn't earned by playing childish games.
Astro
#54
My Feedback: (1)
LOL, says the man that snuck back into a forum where he had previously been banned and then lied about his career. Unless you’re going to try to convince us that you went from flight status to stock boy at the base PX.
of course that would conflict with the career path you claim in this statement where you decide you needed to argue with someone over the flap configuration on his toy airplane.
( Quote Franklin_M) Who was also a NATOPS Instructor in type, Naval Aviation Safety School graduate (i.e. aviation safety expert & mishap investigator), developmental test pilot, and developmental test pilot instructor.
I'm baffled why he's clinging to nomenclature and misunderstanding of the aircraft despite ample primary source document (NATOPS) proof to the contrary. I think it comes down to effort to capture scale builders. For example, he knows the model's flaps aren't accurate (split vs. semi-Fowler), but if he can find documentation somewhere saying they're split, even if he knows it's wrong, then he can tell customers can submit that incorrect info for scale documentation.
__________________
" If at first you don't succeed....
then carrier landings are not for you! "
........FLY NAVY
of course that would conflict with the career path you claim in this statement where you decide you needed to argue with someone over the flap configuration on his toy airplane.
( Quote Franklin_M) Who was also a NATOPS Instructor in type, Naval Aviation Safety School graduate (i.e. aviation safety expert & mishap investigator), developmental test pilot, and developmental test pilot instructor.
I'm baffled why he's clinging to nomenclature and misunderstanding of the aircraft despite ample primary source document (NATOPS) proof to the contrary. I think it comes down to effort to capture scale builders. For example, he knows the model's flaps aren't accurate (split vs. semi-Fowler), but if he can find documentation somewhere saying they're split, even if he knows it's wrong, then he can tell customers can submit that incorrect info for scale documentation.
__________________
" If at first you don't succeed....
then carrier landings are not for you! "
........FLY NAVY
Astro
#55
My Feedback: (29)
You bring drama and create dirty laundry in every forum you belong to. It's bad enough that it follows you everywhere you post, and each forum has enough of your childish antics on their own. For the last time, respect this forum enough to not cross-contaminate this one with your soiled britches from other forums.
Astro
Astro
HAHahahaha More pig crap! Hypocrite, you’ve cross posted between threads many times. You can make claims all you want……don’t make it true.
#56
My Feedback: (29)
Dude. REALLY? "crossed over"? I've been over there far longer than you, hence my delusional comment. You can write as many words as you want, it just doesn't make them true.
You are truly narcissistic.
Why must you continue with the vitriol of name-calling and pigs making turds stuff? very childish. It certainly doesn't give you the upper hand, rather it shows your true childish colors. Respect is earned, and it certainly isn't earned by playing childish games.
Astro
You are truly narcissistic.
Why must you continue with the vitriol of name-calling and pigs making turds stuff? very childish. It certainly doesn't give you the upper hand, rather it shows your true childish colors. Respect is earned, and it certainly isn't earned by playing childish games.
Astro
#58
My Feedback: (1)
More hypocrisy, I know you may have a hard time keeping up but have you forgotten the time you posted a picture of a guy with his head up his rear end? How about the dozens of times you have called people delusional? Funny how differently you view people who use YOUR tactics on you.
Suggesting that Franklin and I have a homosexual relationship is different on so many levels.
Yes, I am sure your feelings get hurt (the truth tends to do that), and then you strike out with your vitriol-fueled attacks, hence the narcissist statement.
You've provided plenty of evidence of narcissism, delusion and anger that my labels are 100% justified. Your pooping pigs and homosexual nuances are just examples of your inner rage and superiority complex.
Astro
#60
My Feedback: (29)
Astro, words have meaning. Not once in describing your attraction to Franklin have I used the word homosexual. You should comprehend my comments before answering them out of anger. In fact if you stop answering at all we can go back to what we were doing last week. I have low expectations of that though. Your narcissistic personality would never allow me to have the last word.
#61
My Feedback: (1)
Astro, words have meaning. Not once in describing your attraction to Franklin have I used the word homosexual. You should comprehend my comments before answering them out of anger. In fact if you stop answering at all we can go back to what we were doing last week. I have low expectations of that though. Your narcissistic personality would never allow me to have the last word.
And meanings can be nuanced. Please explain what you meant when you assessed that I had an, "infatuation" with Franklin and likened it to, " Rue Paul/Elton John"
This oughtta be good!
Astro
#62
My Feedback: (1)
Astro, words have meaning. Not once in describing your attraction to Franklin have I used the word homosexual. You should comprehend my comments before answering them out of anger. In fact if you stop answering at all we can go back to what we were doing last week. I have low expectations of that though. Your narcissistic personality would never allow me to have the last word.
Here is an example of your narcissism from your quote above: "In fact if you stop answering at all we can go back to what we were doing last week"
Since you seem to want to play, I ask that you provide an example of mine.
Astro
#63
My Feedback: (29)
#64
My Feedback: (1)
Oh no, words have meaning. How many times have you said that? I can write the words for you Astro but I have no way to make you comprehend. Once again I did not say Homosexual. It’s not for me to decide what your feelings for Franklin are, that is on you. All I can say is due to you running to his rescue every time someone questions him it’s obvious that there is something there. That’s something for you to figure out.
It is a simple question. Go.
Astro
#66
My Feedback: (1)
More hypocrisy, I know you may have a hard time keeping up but have you forgotten the time you posted a picture of a guy with his head up his rear end? How about the dozens of times you have called people delusional? Funny how differently you view people who use YOUR tactics on you.
Classic!
#68
#70
My Feedback: (1)
Once again, what evidence do you have regarding my status with moderation? You have zero basis, there is none, yet you continue to type....I've been a member here longer than you, speak my mind, speak the truth, refuse to be PC or woke, do not bow down and suck up to moderation, yet....here I am!
Please back up your words.
Astro
#75
My Feedback: (1)
Speed,
I'll give you some heartfelt advice: come to terms with your emotional hemophlia and superiority complex and stop allowing yourself to be triggered by micro-aggressions. You are not the only one out there that has lots of RC experience, there is always more than one way to skin a cat, not "right", "wrong" or "Speedy's way". Once you can enjoy the hobby for the love of the hobby and not trying to, "be the man", you will be much happier, live longer, and the forums will actually be a better place for it. Lose the anger, find the love!
Astro
I'll give you some heartfelt advice: come to terms with your emotional hemophlia and superiority complex and stop allowing yourself to be triggered by micro-aggressions. You are not the only one out there that has lots of RC experience, there is always more than one way to skin a cat, not "right", "wrong" or "Speedy's way". Once you can enjoy the hobby for the love of the hobby and not trying to, "be the man", you will be much happier, live longer, and the forums will actually be a better place for it. Lose the anger, find the love!
Astro