![]() |
Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
(Post 11934295)
I think one of the FAA statements contradict's your statement.
|
Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
(Post 11934295)
I think one of the FAA statements contradict's your statement.
|
Max,
Sure are a lot of blind people on here! I can see what your link has to do with this thread. There was a twin engine transport airplane that crashed into the bedroom of a house a mile from me. The parents died in their bed. But hey let'sget all worked up over something that hasn't happened, and ignore what has. |
Misletoe, who would think you'd get your face choped-up by quad copter at a TGIF's in NYC. While it was flying around carrying misletoe insde the resturant. This Ch.7 news today. Great press!!!!!:(
|
Originally Posted by smeckert
(Post 11934454)
Max,
Sure are a lot of blind people on here! I can see what your link has to do with this thread. There was a twin engine transport airplane that crashed into the bedroom of a house a mile from me. The parents died in their bed. But hey let'sget all worked up over something that hasn't happened, and ignore what has. Our own personal death will one day be a reality, are you ready to ignore that? Yes this did happen and myself just can dismiss it as "oh well" now to move on. |
Twin engine jet into a home in VA. today. Lost it on final. Killed mother and two children. on the ground and people onboard aircraft. They think something went in engine.:(
|
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/imag...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by FLAPHappy http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/imag...post-right.png
Frank, You may be correct. I read the article, and the cause could have been any number of things, but my thought is Pilot error. The article stated an onlooker said the plane was too low, then turned 90 degrees and belly flopped into the house, I think he panicked , tried to turn, and stalled without the correct airspeed. Just my thought on this article. This article possibly could have been associated with a drone, but I don't think so now.
Originally Posted by phlpsfrnk
(Post 11934074)
I read it that he rolled inverted shortly after being cleared to land before going in. In any case tragic.
Frank My favorite is the GA plane at 110 kts ran down and crashed into the airliner filled with (put a number here over 95) When it 99% the airliners fault. The flying public doesn't realize that the only tome that the ATC systems Gaeurentees separation of air craft is when both are on an active IFR flight Plan and are both in IFR conditions. Other wise it is SEE and BE SEEN and all ATC advisories of traffic are just that ADVISORY, they do not gauerenty separation. It is the responsibility of the flight crew to maintain their own separation. |
Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
(Post 11934295)
I think one of the FAA statements contradict's your statement.
|
thinking of selling all my planes to get a Drome. :p
|
Originally Posted by SigMan
(Post 11934663)
thinking of selling all my planes to get a Drome. :p
|
Originally Posted by SigMan
(Post 11934663)
thinking of selling all my planes to get a Drome. :p
|
Originally Posted by HoundDog
(Post 11934728)
U either don't have many good planes or U are going for a very Large Expensive Drone say like a 50% Reaper. Remember Quads are not DRONES they are just Quadcopters. Just because the stupid people in the News media call them DRONES don't make it So.
|
Originally Posted by Rob2160
(Post 11934734)
it was a joke.. DroMe.
|
Originally Posted by HoundDog
(Post 11934740)
With our FAA here in the USA breathing down our necks we can't afford to call things DRONES ... But then I guess I was Jok'en too...sorry. If I could sell all my stuff for what I got in it (impossible I know) I'd have a full scale 182 again.
|
Originally Posted by Rob2160
(Post 11934759)
I know what you mean.. I hate to think how much I have tied up in RC.. But life is short and he who dies with the most toys wins.
My thing know at almost 72 is "If I don't spend it My daughter will If she could even before I'm back in the food chine." Just hope the last check written to the "ScumBag" Undertaker' Bounces. |
Originally Posted by HoundDog
(Post 11934773)
My sentiments exactly but U R still dead and all your friends / flying buddy's are going to try and cheat your widow out of all your stuff cause U told her how little this hobby costs and how cheep U got those planes.
My thing know at almost 72 is "If I don't spend it My daughter will If she could even before I'm back in the food chine." Just hope the last check written to the "ScumBag" Undertaker' Bounces. |
Originally Posted by Rob2160
(Post 11934782)
Too funny and good point.. I might have to leave a detailed inventory with the real values in the will.
Now I'm going out to the field ... got there yesterday and all my Buds were headed for LUNCH ... don't want to miss a meal now do we. |
deleted
|
Originally Posted by FLAPHappy
(Post 11934359)
Sport, witch FAA contradicts the last statement?, I would like to read it. "If the inside of a Restaurant is not in the NAS. They meaning the FAA, can not regulate that.,It's like flying a small quad copter inside your home, living room, or elsewhere on your immediate and owned by you property, owner of that land. Then if above 400' you are now in NAS. That is what I believe is the FAA ruling.
:eek:;) |
All your airspace are belong to us.
|
U don't even own the air U breath ... the government i.e. FAA/NTSB owns it and they said so. If U R really nice and "Play well with others" (Remember that little check mark U used to get on your Kindergarten report card) they may let U use/borrow/rent some air space. Some how I never got that check mark ... Does that mean I do Or I don't play well with others?
|
I may be wrong here but I thought that up to 400' the property owner owns the airspace. I believe that in the real estate one is able to purchase airspace. I think they call it sightlines. The intent is that if someone builds some high end apartments with a veiw of some landscape/ocean then he will want to protect his investment by buying up the airspace between his building and the view subject. This way someone can't come in and build a highrise that blocks the view thus bringing down his property value.
|
Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
(Post 11936427)
I may be wrong here but I thought that up to 400' the property owner owns the airspace. I believe that in the real estate one is able to purchase airspace. I think they call it sightlines. The intent is that if someone builds some high end apartments with a veiw of some landscape/ocean then he will want to protect his investment by buying up the airspace between his building and the view subject. This way someone can't come in and build a highrise that blocks the view thus bringing down his property value.
The place I fly at in Wisconsin (0WI8) is a full scale Private restricted air strip that has been there since the some where around 1929. This fall a new subdivision was started 2000' SSE of where we stand to fly (Facing South) S Our planes will come with in 1200' of them. We can go all electric no problem if it keeps our field. But I'll tell U right know what is going to happen Some goofes is going to build there and the first time a full scale goes over his house he's going to complain to the city that he didn't know that F'kn air port was there. It's been there longer this guy has been on this earth. gimmie a break. Stay in Milwaukee where U belong. |
This was on MSN.http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techno...ers/ar-BBgIo1k
Here comes change. |
Will bashing the AMA on RC Universe satisfy the CBO participation requirements?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.