![]() |
how about a link? google search shows a club FB page that hasn't been updated since Sept 2015.
|
just type permian basin model airplane club pbmac on facebook.
that is how i got it. |
Originally Posted by mongo
(Post 12186581)
just type permian basin model airplane club pbmac on facebook.
that is how i got it. Nothing official from the club. Just a copy of some message from a guy that was copied and pasted to their page. Mike |
Originally Posted by porcia83
(Post 12186233)
Would love to hear from these folks, how the FAA randomly selected this field, and how the determined that 400ft level was "broken", even more so since we are allowed as AMA members to do so.
|
Originally Posted by rcmiket
(Post 12186636)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/PBMAC/?fref=nf
Nothing official from the club. Just a copy of some message from a guy that was copied and pasted to their page. Mike |
I dug into this and all I can find is hearsay other than the supposed club involved is 1.8 miles from an airport
|
Originally Posted by BarracudaHockey
(Post 12186681)
I dug into this and all I can find is hearsay other than the supposed club involved is 1.8 miles from an airport
|
Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
(Post 12186445)
They may ask the local police to ask you for this but you do not have to provide such. Only a warrant will allow them to. Not saying it is wise to resist, but there is no law that says they must ask nor any law that says you must comply. The FAA is not a law enforcement division, and their jurisdiction is only on certified pilots and registered aircraft. The local police do not have jurisdiction and of course may ask, but you do not have to provide. In short a "Law Enforcement Reference Card", is not law or regulation.
|
Originally Posted by rgburrill
(Post 12186692)
Moderators, this guy is getting dangerous with his false information. can't you shut him up?
So show me a regulation or law that says otherwise. |
If that was directed at me, I don't moderate AMA forums, that little joy belongs solely to RC Ken, if you feel a post violates RCU rules/policy you're free to report it. If you don't like or disagree with the content, then you're free to ignore it.
|
I suggest that the derogatory post asking to ban me be removed. He cannot prove anything I have posted is false. He continues to claim everything I say is false. I do not recall that he could ever disprove my posts. Not saying I never post something that is incorrect as others have corrected me. Just that this person never has a clue and continues to use defamatory rhetoric against me.
|
Originally Posted by BarracudaHockey
(Post 12186681)
I dug into this and all I can find is hearsay other than the supposed club involved is 1.8 miles from an airport
I'm not saying clubs will never get a visit, but it would certainly help to have those actually involved write about it here, or RCG, or even the drone sites so that we can all understand what went down, how it was handled, and most importantly what might have triggered the visit. I'm going to go out on a limb and note the visits will probably be as a result of someone doing something wrong, or a report of an issue. Contrary to a few comments about standing your ground, cops don't have a right etc etc, that's all fine and well to say if you aren't flying at a club, or better yet own the property. For many of us, we're on town/city/state property. Thumbing your nose rarely works well in these situations. Answer the questions, show your cards if asked, and if you didn't do anything wrong, there won't be any issues. Yes Yes, a sheeple approach to some, but it's the reality of what we're dealing with. If you think you've been wronged somehow, file the appropriate complaints. |
Originally Posted by rgburrill
(Post 12186692)
Moderators, this guy is getting dangerous with his false information. can't you shut him up?
|
It's not even clear what club! Someone posted on the PBMAC website, but they did not say it was at the PBMAC field.
|
Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon
(Post 12186734)
I can't trust anything he says. None of his posts contain references to the code he is referring to many of them contain the word probably.
|
Section 44103(d) of Title 49 of the United States Code says: "An operator of an aircraft shall make available for inspection a certificate of registration for the aircraft when requested by a United States Government, State, or local law enforcement officer."
Sport was wrong in saying that local law enforcement officers need a warrant to see your registration certificate. This is something all full-scale pilots know. |
So some more digging turned up the actual event took place at Supulveda Basin which is 1.8 or so miles from Van Nuys Airport, the club has an agreement with the authority to stay under 400 feet.
I still haven't seen the actual citations. |
Originally Posted by Top_Gunn
(Post 12186781)
Section 44103(d) of Title 49 of the United States Code says: "An operator of an aircraft shall make available for inspection a certificate of registration for the aircraft when requested by a United States Government, State, or local law enforcement officer."
Sport was wrong in saying that local law enforcement officers need a warrant to see your registration certificate. This is something all full-scale pilots know. This is a model airplane and that section does not apply to them. I as does the AMA believe that model airplanes is excepted from this law. |
Granted I did not know about that. However it was written for full scall aircraft. This is a model airplane and that section does not apply to them. I as does the AMA believe that model airplanes is excepted from this law. |
Originally Posted by Top_Gunn
(Post 12186817)
Well, the FAA's whole registration thing is based on their belief that model airplanes are airplanes, so they don't agree with you. I wish the AMA well in its challenges, but I'm not optimistic. To be sure, if you're right nobody (including the FAA) can insist on seeing your model's registration, but if we're going to operate on the assumption that models aren't aircraft, then why register in the first place?
but if we're going to operate on the assumption that models aren't aircraft, then why register in the first place? |
The man ain't keepin you down brother!
|
When I read it again it says we must make available. It does not say the local police must check for registration. Unless deeper into that section. |
Originally Posted by porcia83
(Post 12186861)
The man ain't keepin you down brother!
|
Originally Posted by Top_Gunn
(Post 12186880)
I'm pretty sure nobody has claimed they're required to do that. But so what? You said that if they did check you wouldn't have to show it to them unless they had a warrant. That's not true. Unless we're assuming that the whole registration requirement is invalid, in which case you wouldn't need to register at all, so if they ask to see your registration you wouldn't ask for a warrant, you''d tell them you don't have one. In short, this talk about warrants is nonsense.
|
Originally Posted by Top_Gunn
(Post 12186880)
I'm pretty sure nobody has claimed they're required to do that. But so what? You said that if they did check you wouldn't have to show it to them unless they had a warrant. That's not true. Unless we're assuming that the whole registration requirement is invalid, in which case you wouldn't need to register at all, so if they ask to see your registration you wouldn't ask for a warrant, you''d tell them you don't have one. In short, this talk about warrants is nonsense.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.