![]() |
Re: Re: AMA
Originally posted by Hossfly Your comments intrigues my interest concerning the TV/Radio area. There is no way AMA could afford such advertising and expect any return Horrace Cain AMA 539 CD/Leader Candidate for AMA EVP AMA spent millions on buildings and other things, yet people continue to say that AMA cannot afford TV ads. Maybe so, but why couldn't they make a video showcasing all aspects of aeromodeling or whatever else they would/should show to the public and rent, lend, sell, give away these tapes to the members, schools, etc.? Whomever gets these video tapes could give them to local cable TV stations. I know that these stations are always looking for something to air. AMA should afford to do something like that. We had no trouble doing this at no cost to us: http://www.wnytonight.net/id21.htm #569 Taped: July 11 Mary Carubba hosts Radio Control/Glider Flyer enthusiasts. Guests: Clarence Ragland-Remote Control RC Flight Instructor, Henri Kursten-Tech Ed Instructor Newfane High School and Jeffrey Liddell-Radio Control Flyer. For more details on Radio Control Flying contact Clarence Ragland at 716-434-7965 or email at [email protected] Take care, CCR http://www.kites.org/rc_instructors |
AMA
I believe the information Video is a good Idea and do-able, I have not looked into it yet but there may already be something available.
Several of our clubs and clubs I visit get News Coverage in the local stations for their Annual Fly-Ins and such, it very easy to get a spot on the local news if you combine your Fly-in or funfly with a charity of some kind, Like The Taylor Mo. club does for M.D.A. every year. If I were wanting more exposer of my activity I would want to advertise it in venues of potential customers or recruits not to the folks that are already part of the organization . For Model Aviation I would look more to Car Mags, Sports Mags, Outdoor Mags etc. as well as the M.A. mags. In order for a national TV or radio Ads to do any kind of return for cost it would have to be during a major event , that alone could cost more than the HQ and NFS complex did in just a few ads. I would Love to see it , but I'm not sure I would want to be an officer in the AMA the next day after the financial report came out. I believe if the members were to see the cost proposals for TV and radio ads and were given the decision to make they would vote it down. I don't believe the same would be true for the HQ and NFS if they look at the big picture, the complex may be very large as far as acres go , but IMO LAND is still one of the better investments and you can almost always make money on it, IMO it was a wise decision to invest in the land and the complex if anything to have something to fall back on. |
Why did the AMA
1st- I do know about the SFA , They cut their own throats, They tried to Hammer the AMA with FALSE accusations and lost and got nailed on the counter . Luke |
AMA
Theres is an alternitive, United Modelers Of America, UMA. No argument there are jerks of every knid and I am sure there were some not to friendly to SFA people, we have fields here that accepted both, It never really bothered me. There are Modelers not friendly to Heli Pilots at primary fixed wing places, Unfriendlys at powered sites aginst gliders , unfriendlys to electric from glow and gas , and all vise versa as well. the list goes on. The AMA was recovering MY money spent to defend itself aginst the SFA , AMA had every right to and won. All the SFA wanted to do was make a quick buck off the AMA and got spanked for it. I am all for competition, When another organization comes along and wants to offer ALL the benifits that AMA offers , then I will jump on board . so far nobodys come close.
|
Why did the AMA
The AMA was recovering MY money spent to defend itself aginst the SFA , AMA had every right to and won. All the SFA wanted to do was make a quick buck off the AMA and got spanked for it. When another organization comes along and wants to offer ALL the benifits that AMA offers , then I will jump on board . so far nobodys come close. Take care, and I'll see ya around. I'm done with this thread though! Luke AMA :thumbdown |
Why did the AMA
Originally posted by F106A Hi David, About 8 years ago someone was elected to the EC and the EC voided his victory stating that he didn't have enough "business experience" to be on the EC. They didn't care that he was elected by the members of his district, he just wasn't good enough for them. I could do the research and give you a specific name and date, but it's not really worth the time. Regards, Jon |
Why did the AMA
Originally posted by F106A About 8 years ago someone was elected to the EC and the EC voided his victory stating that he didn't have enough "business experience" to be on the EC. They didn't care that he was elected by the members of his district, he just wasn't good enough for them. I could do the research and give you a specific name and date, but it's not really worth the time. Regards, Jon Regards, Bill Lee |
Why did the AMA
Originally posted by Bill Lee quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by F106A About 8 years ago someone was elected to the EC and the EC voided his victory stating that he didn't have enough "business experience" to be on the EC. They didn't care that he was elected by the members of his district, he just wasn't good enough for them. I could do the research and give you a specific name and date, but it's not really worth the time. Regards, Jon Jon, I suggest you not waste your time looking for proof of this allegation since it is pure unadulterated B.S. Regards, Bill Lee There are better ways to get the results you want that do not involve the unpleasant types of things you seem to be interested in doing these days. You have inadvertently given the wrong impression by the out of context misquoting of the statement, but that is not really a problem in this case. Unless you are setting the new standard for AMA Fellows to communicate with the pond scum membership, you have allowed what is probably bad information fester and do damage to those who would put beans in their noses. In other words, it is worth his time to do the research and provide the documentation. There are at lest 2 of us who would expect him to provide the background proofs or withdraw the statement as soon as possible as we perceive it damages our organization. I suspect that he has heard a twisted version of something that happened, but like others I wish proof. Bill, that is what is needed is for JON to prove or disprove the misinformation you are mistakenly giving credence to by chasing him off with your alpha male barnyard references. We need to put out the fire, not make more smoke. Regards. |
Why did the AMA
Originally posted by Jim Branaum Evening Bill, There are better ways to get the results you want that do not involve the unpleasant types of things you seem to be interested in doing these days. You have inadvertently given the wrong impression by the out of context misquoting of the statement, but that is not really a problem in this case. Unless you are setting the new standard for AMA Fellows to communicate with the pond scum membership, you have allowed what is probably bad information fester and do damage to those who would put beans in their noses. In other words, it is worth his time to do the research and provide the documentation. There are at lest 2 of us who would expect him to provide the background proofs or withdraw the statement as soon as possible as we perceive it damages our organization. I suspect that he has heard a twisted version of something that happened, but like others I wish proof. Bill, that is what is needed is for JON to prove or disprove the misinformation you are mistakenly giving credence to by chasing him off with your alpha male barnyard references. We need to put out the fire, not make more smoke. Regards. "Jon, I suggest you not waste your time looking for proof of this allegation since it is simply not true." The rest of your rant needs no response. Bill Lee |
Why did the AMA
Originally posted by Bill Lee Yes, Jim, you're right: my choice of language was poorly made. Best it should have said: "Jon, I suggest you not waste your time looking for proof of this allegation since it is simply not true." The rest of your rant needs no response. Bill Lee In case you had not noticed, JON made the statement that you are calling a lie. Rather than calling an AMA member a liar, I would have expected you to ask him to withdraw the allegation or support it with proof. So much for expecting our newest AMA FELLOW to be part of the team interested in protecting the AMA from stupid unfounded rumor. Now if you really want a rant, read on and get an education at no extra charge. I was part of the Marine Corps and in RVN for 2 years learning much worse language than you have used, but I challenge you to find where *I* have used any of it. From that observation we should be able to infer that knowing foul language does not mean it has to be used. In fact, if you search carefully enough you will find there are many ways to properly say worse. This means that the use of foul language is unnecessary and uncalled for, but many resort to it. I have learned from observation that those who elect to use that type of language for written (recorded) communication are generally are lacking in other skills and use the shock value of the filth to divert the readers attention from their deficiencies. Usually those shortages are in mental agility and capability. Cheers |
hello
hello jim
semper fi dennis :) |
AT-EASE MARINE
Originally posted by Jim Branaum In case you had not noticed, JON made the statement that you are calling a lie. Rather than calling an AMA member a liar, I would have expected you to ask him to withdraw the allegation or support it with proof. So much for expecting our newest AMA FELLOW to be part of the team interested in protecting the AMA from stupid unfounded rumor. Now if you really want a rant, read on and get an education at no extra charge. I was part of the Marine Corps and in RVN for 2 years learning much worse language than you have used, but I challenge you to find where *I* have used any of it. From that observation we should be able to infer that knowing foul language does not mean it has to be used. In fact, if you search carefully enough you will find there are many ways to properly say worse. This means that the use of foul language is unnecessary and uncalled for, but many resort to it. I have learned from observation that those who elect to use that type of language for written (recorded) communication are generally are lacking in other skills and use the shock value of the filth to divert the readers attention from their deficiencies. Usually those shortages are in mental agility and capability. Cheers BV |
Why did the AMA
It would appear we've gotten off subject. Please keep it on track and avoid commentary directed towards flaming another individual. Thanks.
|
Why did the AMA
To Jim and Dennis...Semper Fi guys...and is it my imagination or did someone mention helios?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.