Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
 Hangar 9 Cap 232 >

Hangar 9 Cap 232

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Hangar 9 Cap 232

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2004 | 12:25 AM
  #1  
RaptorCam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tehachapi, CA
Default Hangar 9 Cap 232

I am in a situation where I might be trading my cermark pitts arf for a hangar 9 cap 232. The cap weighs in at about 11.5 pounds and was wondering how the YS 1.20 or Saito 1.50 would do? I already choose the YS 1.20 over the Saito 1.50 but I will probably be putting the YS on a U Can Do . Will the 1.50 be ok ? It has a MDS 1.48 on it now but I have seen more negative comments about this engine than anything. Looking at the price of a new one I can't see how it could be a quality product to begin with.
Old 05-25-2004 | 02:46 AM
  #2  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: west wyalong, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

i have a 150 in a cmpro edge and came out at 10.5lbs
it pulls it around pretty good with a 16x8 apc but, i wish i had put a 180 in it now.not much difference in price and the 180 has heaps of grunt.
i have a 180 in a modeltech ultimate it weighs about 11.5lbs and has heaps of power.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Om34075.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	76.3 KB
ID:	136140   Click image for larger version

Name:	Up49110.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	105.8 KB
ID:	136141  
Old 05-25-2004 | 02:49 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: west wyalong, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

sorry wrong pic of ultimate.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Da83171.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	43.5 KB
ID:	136142  
Old 05-25-2004 | 07:34 AM
  #4  
P-51B's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

I will assume that you are talking about the 73" span version of the H-9 Cap?

There is one at my field on a 1.50 that seems to do just fine with pattern style flying. I wouldn't be expecting any modern 3-D performance out of the plane though.
Old 05-25-2004 | 07:36 AM
  #5  
ben beyer's Avatar
My Feedback: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,385
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bryan TX
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

I'm putting a Saito 180 in mine, but that's only because i bought the airplane and then asked about the engine. The guy I bought the engine from has a couple of these airplanes and has a Saito 150 in them. It would probably be enough power to barely do 3D but it depends on what you want to do with the airplane. Saito 150 should be fine honestly.
Old 05-25-2004 | 12:18 PM
  #6  
RaptorCam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tehachapi, CA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

I am mainly wanting to be able to hover and vertical out of it. Looks like Im may have to use the YS in the Cap and the Saito in the U Can Do. Does anyone have any experience of knowledge of the MDS 1.48 2 stroke? As far as power how does it compare to the Saito 1.50? The MDS 1.48 thats on it does not run reliably so Im hesitant to take the Cap up with it.
Old 05-25-2004 | 04:48 PM
  #7  
Texastbird's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: La Porte, TX
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

I run the MDS 1.48 on a Lanier Extra 77" ARF. This is my (larger) aerobatic trainer. It wants to run on 5% or less nitro with a castor-synthetic blend. I tried 10% and it would choke and die. It has enough punch with a 16X8 Apc for some impressive, if not unlimited, verticals on this plane. And by the way, a MDS takes a lot of break in time on the bench before its ready to fly reliably. For the price, I'm tickled pink with my MDS, it just takes a little patience for it to come in.
Old 05-26-2004 | 08:58 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Hammonton, NJ
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

1.80 on mine plenty of vertical power and will climb in a knife edge unless show restraint with the throttle(with 15o/o S&W). Does suck the fuel at an alarming rate at high throttle settings.
Old 05-26-2004 | 09:41 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: nampa, ID
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

i had a os 160fx on mine would hover at just over half throttle with a 17-8 apc prop. this is a snap happy plane so be carefull
Old 05-27-2004 | 07:38 AM
  #10  
P-51B's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

ORIGINAL: watso

.. this is a snap happy plane so be carefull

VERY snap happy.
Old 05-27-2004 | 08:23 AM
  #11  
RaptorCam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tehachapi, CA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

Thanks for the heads up, both of you. I have only flown it once and that was with the MDS 1.48 on it. I was flying it for the owner and also deciding if I wanted to swap. I was going to give him my pitts with the YS FZ 1.20 but after I read up on the MDS 1.48 I decided to keep my engine and let him keep his. I guess I am going with the Saito 1.50. Having the Twist and the U Can Do with the 1.20 should keep me happy on the 3D side.
Old 05-27-2004 | 08:28 AM
  #12  
RaptorCam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tehachapi, CA
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

ORIGINAL: Texastbird

I run the MDS 1.48 on a Lanier Extra 77" ARF. This is my (larger) aerobatic trainer. It wants to run on 5% or less nitro with a castor-synthetic blend. I tried 10% and it would choke and die. It has enough punch with a 16X8 Apc for some impressive, if not unlimited, verticals on this plane. And by the way, a MDS takes a lot of break in time on the bench before its ready to fly reliably. For the price, I'm tickled pink with my MDS, it just takes a little patience for it to come in.
Thanks for that info. I may pick up some 5% today and give it a whirl. I know needle settings very but can you give me a an approximate number of turns out of your high speed setting? I downloaded some MDS instructions yesterday and it stated 2 1/2 turns out to start with and go in from there. Does that sound right to you?
Old 05-27-2004 | 11:27 AM
  #13  
Texastbird's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: La Porte, TX
Default RE: Hangar 9 Cap 232

Yeah, Widowmaker, that should be a very rich setting to get it started on. I think mine is about 1-1/2 turns out after break in. It likes Powermaster 5% best. I'm sure any fuel with some castor will work.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.