GP Pitts - Completion
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (198)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Reno, OK
Completed the Pitts. With ZDZ 40, all up, RTF weight is 15.1 lbs. Kept good detail notes, it was truly an excellent ARF experience. Even the minor miscue on the tailwheel was just that - minor!
Now all I need are some buffered extensions (using FM, got some jitter), and some NON-Windy OK weather!
I STRONGLY recommend this kit!!
Now all I need are some buffered extensions (using FM, got some jitter), and some NON-Windy OK weather!
I STRONGLY recommend this kit!!
#2
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (198)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Reno, OK
Forgot to mention important info....CG, with the ZDZ, 2700mah NiMh battery under cockpit, throttle servo just in front of instrument panel, everything else dead stock.... Exactly 5 1/4" aft of leading edgo of top wing...dead center...
#3

My Feedback: (45)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Wilsonville,
OR
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the report. I can't wait for your flight report. The ZDZ ought to work well in it. I'm considering getting one of these and I'm really curious as to how they fly. Do you do any 3D flying or just pattern? I haven't been able to talk to anyone that knows how well the Pitts is suited to 3D work.
>>2700mah NiMh battery
There's some weight to be saved.
Can you tell me why you went with that big of a battery? What size to you have on the ignition?
Thanks for the report. I can't wait for your flight report. The ZDZ ought to work well in it. I'm considering getting one of these and I'm really curious as to how they fly. Do you do any 3D flying or just pattern? I haven't been able to talk to anyone that knows how well the Pitts is suited to 3D work.
>>2700mah NiMh battery
There's some weight to be saved.
Can you tell me why you went with that big of a battery? What size to you have on the ignition?
#5
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (198)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Reno, OK
Battery choice is using so many coreless servos...the NiMh 4 cell weighs 5.9 oz, so that's okay. Ignition batt is 1100 mah NiCad, per ZDZ recommendations.
I **ALWAYS** prefer mah "on board" to "wish I'd recharged sooner" :-)
The Pitts I've flown in the past would tumble, snap, and spin like crazy!! TR no problem, given enough power, but the wing loading is likely too high for some of the more insane 3D stuff (not that I could do any of it anyway)
I **ALWAYS** prefer mah "on board" to "wish I'd recharged sooner" :-)
The Pitts I've flown in the past would tumble, snap, and spin like crazy!! TR no problem, given enough power, but the wing loading is likely too high for some of the more insane 3D stuff (not that I could do any of it anyway)
#6

My Feedback: (45)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Wilsonville,
OR
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the feedback.
>>I **ALWAYS** prefer mah "on board" to "wish I'd recharged sooner"
I can understand that, not a bad philosophy. Sometimes I get too obsessed about weight. I just test the batteries before each flight and carry an extra charged battery to swap out.
Thanks for the feedback.
>>I **ALWAYS** prefer mah "on board" to "wish I'd recharged sooner"
I can understand that, not a bad philosophy. Sometimes I get too obsessed about weight. I just test the batteries before each flight and carry an extra charged battery to swap out.
#7
Member
My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Port St Lucie,
FL
Bob,
Just mounted a 3.2 Brisson in mine & Pitts muffler I had a G-62 I thought would be nice but better off with the 3.2 or the Z-40. Good choice you made. Mine is pretty much right on CG. The g-62 is too much engine and weight for the nose. I added a 5/8 ply firewall and glassed over the whole front firewall for added strength. Did you put in a smoke system? I added a TME pump and 36 oz. smoke tank right on the CG. Fits just right. The cowling needed alittle cutting for the two bottom fins on the 3.2 and bosch plug cover. Any bigger engine would have to really do major cutouts and lose the scale appearance of cowling. I ran two rudder servos and two split elevator servos. Ran 4 aileron servos. I am very pleased with the kit. Best ARF I have seen to date. I guess I have the newer version with the aluminum gear and spinner, also the update sheet with newer wheels pant blocks and control horns. The covering and paint are excellent. I don't know how they could sell this ARF for only $ 399..?????
Can't wait to test fly ....maybe 1 more week.
Good Luck with Yours,
Robert
Just mounted a 3.2 Brisson in mine & Pitts muffler I had a G-62 I thought would be nice but better off with the 3.2 or the Z-40. Good choice you made. Mine is pretty much right on CG. The g-62 is too much engine and weight for the nose. I added a 5/8 ply firewall and glassed over the whole front firewall for added strength. Did you put in a smoke system? I added a TME pump and 36 oz. smoke tank right on the CG. Fits just right. The cowling needed alittle cutting for the two bottom fins on the 3.2 and bosch plug cover. Any bigger engine would have to really do major cutouts and lose the scale appearance of cowling. I ran two rudder servos and two split elevator servos. Ran 4 aileron servos. I am very pleased with the kit. Best ARF I have seen to date. I guess I have the newer version with the aluminum gear and spinner, also the update sheet with newer wheels pant blocks and control horns. The covering and paint are excellent. I don't know how they could sell this ARF for only $ 399..?????
Can't wait to test fly ....maybe 1 more week.
Good Luck with Yours,
Robert
#8
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (198)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Reno, OK
A Race! I like it!
The 3.2 sounds like you'll have a little more oomph...and I agree with your observations. Mine had the same updates as yours - solid alum gear...we'll have to wait and see how THEY survive!!
Wonder who will be first ???
The 3.2 sounds like you'll have a little more oomph...and I agree with your observations. Mine had the same updates as yours - solid alum gear...we'll have to wait and see how THEY survive!!
Wonder who will be first ???
#10
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (198)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Reno, OK
There will be NO "first flight" in MY zip code until maybe Sunday!!! Very strange weather, and here it is Spring already....I'll post a thorough report when it's done!
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fisher,
IL
Flyguy....
I dont understand your comment above... There is no "Newer Version". All the Pitts have the control horns, blocks, aluminum gear and Aluminum Spinner.
FWIW
Craig
I dont understand your comment above... There is no "Newer Version". All the Pitts have the control horns, blocks, aluminum gear and Aluminum Spinner.
FWIW
Craig



