Rx question
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tampa,
FL
I recently bought a nexstar 46 RTF. Can someone please tell me what the reason is for wrapping the Rx (and Rx battery for that matter) in foam? The only reason I ask is because i've been running 1/5 scale onroads, offroads, and boats all with gas engines with the Rx's fastened by double sided tape and the Rx batteries by velcro straps. I have never had any problems. One time, the Rx in the boat actually fell off the tape while running and was bouncing around inside the radio box and still not a problem. Now all of these vibrate a lot when running. Im sure a plane doesn't vibrate any more than my other r/c's. So whats up with the foam then?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
Br;uce
#3
Generally the foam is there to help with vibration and I suppose it could help a little with rough landings and minor crash impact in some cases as well. I have seen people fly without wrapping batteries and receivers but I prefer to play it safe. At the very least I have a layer of foam underneath if it is not wrapped completely.
#4
Thread Starter

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tampa,
FL
Hey thanks Bruce. I was just reading on another site a whole article on 2.4g Rx's. They are not affected by vibration like the old stuff is. Iguess I should have done a more thorough search before making a new post.
#6

My Feedback: (1)
Foam is cheap and light. You can't go wrong with a thin (perhaps 1/4 - 1/2 inch of foam) at least on the bottom of the receiver. I use something like this:
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXMRC7&P=7
and then tie-wrap the receiver to the mounting platform under the wing. I don't wrap it in foam, just sandwich the foam with the receiver on top, the foam in the middle, and of course, the mounting platform on the bottom and then I put a couple of tie wraps around to hold it in place. Since I've move pretty much over to 2.4 GHz operation, this works fine.
One big advantage to this method is that you don't foam completely wrapping the receiver so you have direct access to all the servo connectors, the battery connector, and of course, the binding slot for the binding plug.
CGr.
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXMRC7&P=7
and then tie-wrap the receiver to the mounting platform under the wing. I don't wrap it in foam, just sandwich the foam with the receiver on top, the foam in the middle, and of course, the mounting platform on the bottom and then I put a couple of tie wraps around to hold it in place. Since I've move pretty much over to 2.4 GHz operation, this works fine.
One big advantage to this method is that you don't foam completely wrapping the receiver so you have direct access to all the servo connectors, the battery connector, and of course, the binding slot for the binding plug.
CGr.
#7

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: landeck
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
CGr.
#8

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Careful with 2.4....it's best not to wrap the receiver in foam...instead place foam at the corners of the receiver to allow cooling air to circulate around the receiver
#9
Thread Starter

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tampa,
FL
ORIGINAL: jetmech05
Careful with 2.4....it's best not to wrap the receiver in foam...instead place foam at the corners of the receiver to allow cooling air to circulate around the receiver
Careful with 2.4....it's best not to wrap the receiver in foam...instead place foam at the corners of the receiver to allow cooling air to circulate around the receiver
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bend,
OR
ORIGINAL: Johnnysplits
True. Futaba says the same thing.
ORIGINAL: jetmech05
Careful with 2.4....it's best not to wrap the receiver in foam...instead place foam at the corners of the receiver to allow cooling air to circulate around the receiver
Careful with 2.4....it's best not to wrap the receiver in foam...instead place foam at the corners of the receiver to allow cooling air to circulate around the receiver
#11
Thread Starter

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tampa,
FL
ORIGINAL: oldtyme
Yeah......we were talking about this the other day. I just mount foam on the airframe with double sided mounting tape and then mount the receiver on the foam with double sided mounting tape. I have this in several models and it works great with plenty of air being able to get to the receiver.
Yeah......we were talking about this the other day. I just mount foam on the airframe with double sided mounting tape and then mount the receiver on the foam with double sided mounting tape. I have this in several models and it works great with plenty of air being able to get to the receiver.
#12

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: washington twp.,
MI
ORIGINAL: CGRetired
Why is that, Bruce? If it's 72 MHz, you still have a crystal. And you still have vibaration caused by the glow powered engine as well as vibration from driving on land or of boating over the water.
CGr.
ORIGINAL: landeck
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
CGr.
Tom
#13

My Feedback: (1)
I think I understand that part of flying RC.. you see, I've done it for quite some time now.
I'm not sure that's what Bruce meant. But if his comment was that simple, then I can accept that. MY point is that vibration is vibration and causes the same problems with receivers no matter what they are installed on.
CGr.
I'm not sure that's what Bruce meant. But if his comment was that simple, then I can accept that. MY point is that vibration is vibration and causes the same problems with receivers no matter what they are installed on.
CGr.
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: CGRetired
Why is that, Bruce? If it's 72 MHz, you still have a crystal. And you still have vibaration caused by the glow powered engine as well as vibration from driving on land or of boating over the water.
CGr.
ORIGINAL: landeck
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
It is to protect them from vibration. If the crystal breaks in the rx or a contact breaks in the battery, you are going to lose the plane. Not necessary so with a boat or car. Note that the new 2.4Ghz receivers to not have crystals and therefore the need to wrap them in foam is not really necessary.
Br;uce
CGr.
I should have added to my post the fact that I do mount my 2.4 Ghz receivers on a pad of foam using tie wraps or velcro unlike my 72 Mhz receivers which I wrap in foam.
Bruce
#15
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NJ,
NJ
Folks,
Here is what Ifound for my Spektrum AR7000 RX from the manual at link
"Receiver Installation
In gas and glow aircraft install the main receiver using the same method you would use to install a conventional receiver in your aircraft. Typically, wrap the main receiver in protective foam and fasten it in place using rubber bands or hook and loop straps.
Alternately, in electric airplanes or helicopters, it’s acceptable to use thick double-sided foam tape to fasten the main receiver in place.
Mounting the remote receiver in a slightly different location, even just inches away from the primary receiver, gives tremendous improvements in path diversity. Essentially, each receiver sees a different RF environment and this is key to maintaining a solid RF link, even in aircraft that have substantial conductive materials (e.g. larger gas engines, carbon fiber, pipes, etc.), which can weaken the signal."
Here is what Ifound for my Spektrum AR7000 RX from the manual at link
"Receiver Installation
In gas and glow aircraft install the main receiver using the same method you would use to install a conventional receiver in your aircraft. Typically, wrap the main receiver in protective foam and fasten it in place using rubber bands or hook and loop straps.
Alternately, in electric airplanes or helicopters, it’s acceptable to use thick double-sided foam tape to fasten the main receiver in place.
Mounting the remote receiver in a slightly different location, even just inches away from the primary receiver, gives tremendous improvements in path diversity. Essentially, each receiver sees a different RF environment and this is key to maintaining a solid RF link, even in aircraft that have substantial conductive materials (e.g. larger gas engines, carbon fiber, pipes, etc.), which can weaken the signal."
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bend,
OR
ORIGINAL: Johnnysplits
Does the double sided tape keep the Rx stuck to the foam by itself, or do you use a zip tie on it as well?
ORIGINAL: oldtyme
Yeah......we were talking about this the other day. I just mount foam on the airframe with double sided mounting tape and then mount the receiver on the foam with double sided mounting tape. I have this in several models and it works great with plenty of air being able to get to the receiver.
Yeah......we were talking about this the other day. I just mount foam on the airframe with double sided mounting tape and then mount the receiver on the foam with double sided mounting tape. I have this in several models and it works great with plenty of air being able to get to the receiver.



