Running an engine in reverse
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Denton,
TX
If I start an engine in reverse (counter clockwise from the cockpit), will it continue to run normally until the fuel is gone?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Nowata,
OK
It has been my experience,that an engine running in reverse will die when I rev the throttle. Occasionally,I can "blip" the throttle just right and get it to switch directions without dying.
As to whether it will sit there and run at idle til it's out of fuel,I am not sure...but they don't seem to run as well when they're going backwards.
As to whether it will sit there and run at idle til it's out of fuel,I am not sure...but they don't seem to run as well when they're going backwards.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mumbai, INDIA
The dont run backward when you increase the throttle. Think it is because of the porting arrangement that is optimised for the engine oto run in a particular direction. They do start in reverse all the time though
Ameyam
Ameyam
#5

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: foosball_movie
Maybe I'm asking the wrong question....new thread.
Maybe I'm asking the wrong question....new thread.
So what is the right question? Don,t ya just hate these trick questions with no info. If the engine in question is a cox reedy then yes you would be correct but no with most other glow engines.
John
#6

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mountain Home,
AR
If nothing else I would guess that the engine would overheat PDQ as the propwash from the engine has to have some cooling effect on it. If it runs backwards and blows the air away from the engine, won't it overheat and seize rather quickly?
#7

My Feedback: (1)
To run a conventional two stroke glow front rotor engine in reverse rotation for a counter rotating twin engine airplane You would need either a reverse rotation crankshaft which you are unlikely to find or if the engine is an older two piece crankcase design with a four bolt removable front case and carburator. If it is this type then rotating the housing 180 degrees I think it is will allow reverse running.
You will still need a pusher prop on one engine mounted backward with the blade face toward the engine rather than facing away from the engine in a pusher installation. This severely limits your selection of props and the whole CR thing is grossly overrated and won't save your bacon if choose the wrong response when an engine does quit on you. The small advantage of not having a 'critical engine' with CR is simply not worth the considerable hassel.
John
You will still need a pusher prop on one engine mounted backward with the blade face toward the engine rather than facing away from the engine in a pusher installation. This severely limits your selection of props and the whole CR thing is grossly overrated and won't save your bacon if choose the wrong response when an engine does quit on you. The small advantage of not having a 'critical engine' with CR is simply not worth the considerable hassel.
John
#10

My Feedback: (1)
If it is this type then rotating the housing 180 degrees I think it is will allow reverse running.
#12

My Feedback: (1)
Thank you for the correction HP you are quite right. I have never done CR as its in most cases a waste time. The trade off's are not worth it. Trouble is most of the fellows always want to start reversing engines when they first get into multi's and its just another crutch kinda like Flaps that every new warbird flyer just has to have.
PDM last night Foosball started another thread here in the beginner forum that explained that this was over his thoughts on a twin. That thread the moderators since moved to the multi engine forum which is reasonable since this is definately not a beginner subject.
John
PDM last night Foosball started another thread here in the beginner forum that explained that this was over his thoughts on a twin. That thread the moderators since moved to the multi engine forum which is reasonable since this is definately not a beginner subject.
John
#13
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: JohnBuckner
PDM last night Foosball started another thread here in the beginner forum that explained that this was over his thoughts on a twin. That thread the moderators since moved to the multi engine forum which is reasonable since this is definately not a beginner subject.
John
PDM last night Foosball started another thread here in the beginner forum that explained that this was over his thoughts on a twin. That thread the moderators since moved to the multi engine forum which is reasonable since this is definately not a beginner subject.
John
Paul




