Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Tissue Vs. Monokote? >

Tissue Vs. Monokote?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Tissue Vs. Monokote?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2012 | 08:22 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Port orchard, WA
Default Tissue Vs. Monokote?

Okay showing my newbie side. I'm just finishing the build on my first balsa plane and been looking for my
next build. I see many planes with tissue covering. Can monokote be substituted for the tissue cover?
<br type="_moz" />
Old 12-31-2012 | 09:25 AM
  #2  
gene6029's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
From: wilson, NC
Default RE: Tissue Vs. Monokote?

It depends on the size of the model/airframe you have. Alot of the older control line models came with silkspan for covering & their wing structures were strong enough to be able to substitute Monokote in place of the silkspan. However, most of the rubber powered kits also came with silkspan & monokote potentially could crush or warp the structure during application. You didnt mention the type airframe you have, so just be aware that Monokote could produce the above mentioned results. I just finished applying Monokote to an old Mini Mambo kit and the monokote wanted to twist the wing during application. I got it done, but had my hands full keeping everything square. This was a kit that came with silkspan for covering.......Gene
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Eb86567.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	232.2 KB
ID:	1835461  
Old 12-31-2012 | 04:00 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Port orchard, WA
Default RE: Tissue Vs. Monokote?

Thanks Wilson, the plane I have been looking at are electric powered.
Old 01-01-2013 | 11:47 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Default RE: Tissue Vs. Monokote?

Hi!
Choose Oracover instead of Monokote! Much better!
You should not use tissue for covering an R/C model. Covering will be too fragile! Tissue is only used on small, light free flight planes and CL planes when used in conjuction with silk and dope.
Old 01-01-2013 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Port orchard, WA
Default RE: Tissue Vs. Monokote?

Great thanks never heard if orocover. What makes it better?
Old 01-01-2013 | 05:47 PM
  #6  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Granger, IN
Default RE: Tissue Vs. Monokote?

There are threads in which people argue at length about Monokote and Oracover (called Ultracote in the U.S.) Some people prefer one, others like the other one. Don't take any one person's word as gospel. As for tissue, if you are building a small, light model and the instructions call for tissue, either Monokote or Ultracote would likely be too heavy and too likely to damage the framework when shrinking. You wouldn't use tissue on a .40 size sport model, but you wouldn't use an ordinary film covering on a 1/2A Texaco model, either, at least not on the wings. Coverite makes a lightweight covering called "Coverlight" which is easier to apply than tissue and lighter than conventional films. Both tissue and silk take some skill to apply. What model are you building?
Old 01-01-2013 | 08:33 PM
  #7  
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moreno Valley, CA
Default RE: Tissue Vs. Monokote?

I am covering a Shoestring and after trying both Monocote and Ultracote, I prefer Ultracote. It shrinks way better than Monocote, its easier to work with due to the lower temp used, and feels tighter when done.

Ed

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.