Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Help with Trainer 60 >

Help with Trainer 60

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Help with Trainer 60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2013 | 03:41 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Help with Trainer 60

Hi everyone. Several years back my dad gave me a Nitro Trainer 60 Kit with no radio, electronics or engine. Back then I was way too young to understand how to put something like that together. Now I want to put this plane together.

My RC Experience:

I have owned several Hobby Grade RC planes, cars, and boats before. I have built things with servos and have experience with brushed and brushless Engines.
Some of my models include: Exceed Sunfire Brushless, Exceed Driftstar Brushless, Traxxas Rustler VLX, Piper Cub Brushed, Wild Hawk Brushed and Cessna 182 Brushless 4CH
I have a lot of experience with rc systems but never with nitro engines, but I think I am ready to bring on the challenge.
I am 16

INFO ON THE PLANE:

So one problem is I can not find a brand name anywhere on the plane or in the box or in the manual.
On the manual, all it says is Trainer 60 in bold letters.

Specs:
Length----- ----56in (1422 mm)
Wing Span-----70 in (1778mm)
Wing Area-----900 sq.in (58dm²)
Engine----------0.61 cu.in 2 Stroke
Radio-----------5 Servos / 4 Channel


It looks exactly like this: (colors and everything)
http://www.nitroplanes.com/nircaisptr461.html

but... the specs are a little bit shorter on that page than on my manual. For example, my plane wingspan is 70in but the one on the webpage says 65in
also, the one on the page says it needs a 2C 0.40-0.46cu.in; 4C 0.45-0.61cu.in engine but mine says 0.61 cu.in 2 Stroke


So my question for now is, What engine should I use in this plane!? This is all I have to go off of for now


I ATTACHED THE MANUAL COVER IT CAME WITH


THANKS EVERYONE!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2158.JPG
Views:	214
Size:	999.9 KB
ID:	1936580  
Old 11-04-2013 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Smith, AR
Default

Im bettin its a nitro models super trainer 60 Calls for a 2 stroke 61 or a 4 stroke 91 Lots of choices on engines so do some research on the engines and see what fits your needs.
Old 11-04-2013 | 07:05 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have any suggestions for engines? The cheaper the better, my budget has been mostly going to my Rustler VLX
Old 11-04-2013 | 07:36 PM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,266
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

The Magnum .61 is a decent cheap engine. The Thunder Tiger .61 is a better engine, and probably the best value in RC engines today, but it does cost more. The TT will be more reliable, easier to tune, and will make more power. It's a better beginner's engine simply because it is more likely to be reliable straight out of the box. Some Magnums are as reliable as anything else out there, and some have air leaks that will drive you nuts if you don't have the experience to find them and fix them. Myself, I'd keep an eye out in the classifieds for a used TT or OS .61 or .65 if you need to save money.
Old 11-04-2013 | 10:28 PM
  #5  
whiskykid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.hobbypartz.com/72p-s61a.html

should be about 6 bucks for shipping, and will be plenty of engine for your bird!

ok didn't know you where 8 hrs away till I posted, probably be a bit more for shipping!

Last edited by whiskykid; 11-04-2013 at 10:32 PM.
Old 11-05-2013 | 12:23 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Marseilles, IL
Default

Actually if you can afford it I would suggest an .85 - .95 size 4-stroke... improved power, fuel consumption, and sound... will let you swing a bigger prop as well. If you can't afford that, pretty much any .60 - .65 size 2-stroke would work fine. Ask the guys/gals in your local club (if there is one), most of them, if they have been in the hobby for a while, will have one or two laying around they would be willing to sell.
Old 11-05-2013 | 01:05 AM
  #7  
thailazer's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Liberty Lake, WA
Default

If you want an easy flying plane that is cheap to fly, put a 46 size OS or ASP on it. I fly a Tower Hobbies Trainer 40 with just an OS 25AX on it and it is a blast and my regular flyer. Also built an 82 inch wing for it and use that 95% of the time as hammerheads look so pretty with the bigger wing. Those Chinese ARFs are built fairly light so you can get away with smaller engines.
Old 11-05-2013 | 05:43 AM
  #8  
JohnBuckner's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,441
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Kingman, AZ
Default

Hello theguitar please allow me to also welcome you to the forum, I think you are going to love your introduction to glow powered fight and you have a good start with what I believe will be a fine trainer for you.

Concerning engines please allow me to start first what would be at the very top of my shopping list if I were you. That would without a doubt be two engines both of which would be perfect combinations for your airplane and they are the OS 55AX OR the OS 65AX. These engines are without a doubt the most trouble free and user friendly out there. They are expensive and for that reason they almost always are shouted dowm on the forums. However if you consider the cost in lost flying time due to cranky engines that extra cost now seems quite economical. You wander most any flight line and this user friendliness of especially the OS AX series become obvious.

Now for a slightly cheaper engines my second choice is of course the already mentioned Thunder Tiger .61 Pro and yes I would only consider the Pro model as it is a fine runner and agine I believe a better choice than the cheaper TT model.

At the bottom of my list are the ASP,s and the Maqgnums. Why? Good question engines that are cheaper because of lower levels of quality control are always a crap shoot. Some will be excellent (and I have some excellent examples of both) but many will be boat anchors. So true modelers who are experienced engine enthusiasts can squeeze champaign from a grape but many new folks can only squeeze vinegar.

Only just my opinion

John

Last edited by JohnBuckner; 11-05-2013 at 05:47 AM.
Old 11-05-2013 | 06:36 AM
  #9  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,266
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

John is right, you get what you pay for. A lot of what makes the ASP and Magnum so much cheaper is the lack of warranty and customer support. If you know engines or have some help from someone who does, they can be fine. But they'll never make the power that a TT or OS does.
As a beginner, I will disagree with the suggestion to go smaller on your engine. Those of us who have been flying for a while are able to do the nice long takeoff roll and manage our momentum in the air so that an underpowered plane flies well, but beginners need to have that power up front to pull out of stalls and do fast takeoffs at times when the wind is not cooperative or you just haven't gotten the hang of ground handling.
Old 11-05-2013 | 07:26 AM
  #10  
thailazer's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Liberty Lake, WA
Default

Just to balance this thread a bit..... my two recent 46 ASP engines have been every bit as reliable as my OS engines. Engines in this size have become a commodity with fairly equivalent performance. Next time I go engine shopping, ASP engines will likely win out due to cost.
Old 11-05-2013 | 12:13 PM
  #11  
whiskykid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok some might be misunderstanding his post!

although he included specs on a Nitro models 40 size trainer, that "is not what he has"!

look at the manwell, and notice, it is indeed a "60 size" trainer! so any 46 weather Os, ASP, or TT, will not be enough!

he also said, "cheaper would be better" is why I did not start out with "OS", or a four stroke weather OS or Saito.

my oldest engine I have, is a magnum gp25, and I just fuel, apply power ta glow plug, and after 25 yrs she starts right up, no issues, other then being a bushing engine, and she slobs a lil more fuel!

in short, sounds like the OP just wants too get in the air!

yes there are more then a couple theories about it, "get the best, or you will be disappointed"
or get what you can afford, and if it ends up, you really like flying, and want too stick with it, you can always upgrade later, as you fly what you got! which is what I subscribe too!

I started, with a 50 dollar sig Kadet Jr kit, the fore mentioned,25 buck magnum, a turkey baster, and a clip on glow igniter! all in a cardboard box!
and thanks too some great guys, at my not so local field,(15 miles ta next town over) who took me in a taught me how too fly with what I brought!

oh and a second hand 7channel futaba am radio I got for a C-note!
Old 11-05-2013 | 01:12 PM
  #12  
oliveDrab's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Georgetown, KY
Default OS .91 4-stroke

Originally Posted by theguitar
Do you have any suggestions for engines? The cheaper the better, my budget has been mostly going to my Rustler VLX
I don't know if the OS .91 4-stroke is particularly cheap, but it's an excellent engine. Starts up first time, sounds great. I could fly for easily over 20 minutes on a tank of glow fuel. I just tried to find the price for a new OS .91 4-stroke but I can't find it on OS's web site. There's an OS 95V. Maybe the OS .91 4-stroke has been discontinued. Anyway.....it's a great engine. If you could find one used for a reasonable price I would go for it.

The O.S. FS-95V Ringed 4-Stroke Engine is $299.95 from Tower Hobbies. Not cheap.

Last edited by oliveDrab; 11-05-2013 at 01:24 PM.
Old 11-05-2013 | 01:52 PM
  #13  
GallopingGhostler's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,364
Received 129 Likes on 96 Posts
From: Clovis, NM
Default

Originally Posted by theguitar
Do you have any suggestions for engines? The cheaper the better, my budget has been mostly going to my Rustler VLX
You'll get a lot of on-line advice, some good, some bad. I'd suggest getting in touch with an RC club in your area. There, you will meet real fliers. If you don't know who or where, if there is a hobby shop in your area, that would be best place to inquire. Another place you can go to is the Academy of Model Aeronautics website, http://www.modelaircraft.org

http://www.modelaircraft.org/clubsearch.aspx link will allow you to locate a club near you. There, the club officers can get you in touch with someone to help you with advice on assembling your aircraft, may be even give you flight lessons. This will help you to avoid common and costly mistakes, and also get you in touch with people who can help you as well as a place to fly your airplane.

Also with a limited budget, you may find a club member that is willing to sell you a good used engine or perhaps even a new one for a reasonable price (or sometimes even free!).

Good luck in your build and flying.

Last edited by GallopingGhostler; 11-05-2013 at 01:55 PM.
Old 11-05-2013 | 03:05 PM
  #14  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Owatonna, MN
Default

OK -- lets have some "meat" with all these potatoes. I've been flying the be-jeepers out this exact airplane powered by a Magnum .61 2-stroke for six years. Last winter I pulled off the covering to inspect the airframe as it has been subjected to more high-stress flying that some of my aerobats. I have a bunch of Magnum engines ranging from .46 and .61 2-strokes to .52 and .91 four-stroke. The .52 four-stroke powers a T-34 spinning a 12x6 three-blade prop. No shortage of power there. Back to the Nitro Trainer 60. This airplane is a ***** cat to fly. It flies fast and it flies slow. It is not lightweight but would fly ok with a .46 anything. But why pay O.S. prices when a Magnum .46 is half the price, just as reliable if not moreso, starts at the touch of the starter. Same for the .61. My Nitro has been modified to carry a glider aloft just like the space shuttle hitches a ride on the back of a 747. The shuttle pilot flies the glider back after release. Again, this .61 Magnum is no slouch and has enough power to drag this airplane vertical with authority and it doesn't care that the glider is on it's back. A .61 Magnum is $99 and a .46 is $79 at a hobby shop with the letters HP. Maintenance? None of these Magnum engines has needed repair of any kind. They run well on 10% or 15% nitro fuel. I have a 40 size Big Stik that had a .46AX on it. I pulled that engine to install a .46 Magnum and the Magnum is a better performer. The OP says he doesn't want to stick a lot of money into this airplane and he doesn't have to. I do recommend the .61 Magnum engine just because the airplane performs so well with it. Standard servos are fine. Enjoy. About 3 ounces of lead up front will balance the airplane perfectly with the .61 Magnum.
Old 11-05-2013 | 03:17 PM
  #15  
GallopingGhostler's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,364
Received 129 Likes on 96 Posts
From: Clovis, NM
Default

Actually if theguitar wants a .46, Sig (http://sigmfg.com/) has the Avistar .46 on clearance for $49 each, brand new.
Old 11-05-2013 | 03:24 PM
  #16  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chester, VA
Default

I'd like to second your opinion. I lurk these forums and have seen the mantra many times about Magnum and ASP engines being a "crap shoot" as far as quality. I have at this writing in my garage probably 50+ or these engines, 2 stroke and 4 stroke in displacements ranging from 0.10 to 1.80 . Most of these engines were bought used from the big auction site or RCG and RCU. I have yet to encounter one that did not run as well or better than the OS engines, both 2 and 4 stroke, that I have (probably 30+) I can only assume I am the luckiest guy on earth or the worlds greatest engine tuner (definitely not!!!). I would recommend these engines as well as the Tower Pro series engines (currently unavailable via retail) to anyone. I think my good fortune is due in part to using fuel with the appropriate nitro content for these engines. I have two OS engines with peeled cylinder liners which effectively make them parts donors. I have never had a liner problem with the asian engines I own.
Old 11-05-2013 | 03:47 PM
  #17  
thailazer's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Liberty Lake, WA
Default

Originally Posted by loopdeeloop
OK -- lets have some "meat" with all these potatoes. I've been flying the be-jeepers out this exact airplane powered by a Magnum .61 2-stroke for six years. Last winter I pulled off the covering to inspect the airframe as it has been subjected to more high-stress flying that some of my aerobats. I have a bunch of Magnum engines ranging from .46 and .61 2-strokes to .52 and .91 four-stroke. The .52 four-stroke powers a T-34 spinning a 12x6 three-blade prop. No shortage of power there. Back to the Nitro Trainer 60. This airplane is a ***** cat to fly. It flies fast and it flies slow. It is not lightweight but would fly ok with a .46 anything. But why pay O.S. prices when a Magnum .46 is half the price, just as reliable if not moreso, starts at the touch of the starter. Same for the .61. My Nitro has been modified to carry a glider aloft just like the space shuttle hitches a ride on the back of a 747. The shuttle pilot flies the glider back after release. Again, this .61 Magnum is no slouch and has enough power to drag this airplane vertical with authority and it doesn't care that the glider is on it's back. A .61 Magnum is $99 and a .46 is $79 at a hobby shop with the letters HP. Maintenance? None of these Magnum engines has needed repair of any kind. They run well on 10% or 15% nitro fuel. I have a 40 size Big Stik that had a .46AX on it. I pulled that engine to install a .46 Magnum and the Magnum is a better performer. The OP says he doesn't want to stick a lot of money into this airplane and he doesn't have to. I do recommend the .61 Magnum engine just because the airplane performs so well with it. Standard servos are fine. Enjoy. About 3 ounces of lead up front will balance the airplane perfectly with the .61 Magnum.
Good post Loop! Since it needs weight up front to balance, great reason to use the larger engine.
Old 11-05-2013 | 04:47 PM
  #18  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow Thanks everyone for all of the posts! What a great forum!

So based on my limited budget and many suggestions form you fine people, I'm thinking a Magnum .61

so something like this maybe http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...P?I=LXRLG7&P=8

does that look ok? I mean that price is possible but still Is a lot of money for me


I do have a local hobby shop that works with planes not usually nitro, but they do have experience and they could probably put in a 2nd suggestion.

Thanks!
-theguitar
Old 11-05-2013 | 04:51 PM
  #19  
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Boerne, TX
Default

theguitar, I agree with Galloping Ghostler, connect up with a local club first. Give them a commitment to see this project through to solo and get a commitment from them to help you succeed. If you do this then I will commit to providing you with an engine. George in Texas
Old 11-05-2013 | 04:54 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Really? cool!
Old 11-05-2013 | 05:01 PM
  #21  
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Boerne, TX
Default

It is a lot eaiser to learn from those that love the hobby and are interested in helping other get started. Keep in touch, George
Old 11-05-2013 | 05:08 PM
  #22  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Owatonna, MN
Default

Originally Posted by theguitar
Wow Thanks everyone for all of the posts! What a great forum!

So based on my limited budget and many suggestions form you fine people, I'm thinking a Magnum .61

so something like this maybe http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...P?I=LXRLG7&P=8

does that look ok? I mean that price is possible but still Is a lot of money for me


I do have a local hobby shop that works with planes not usually nitro, but they do have experience and they could probably put in a 2nd suggestion.

Thanks!
-theguitar
Look at that engine closely -- you will notice it is the front needle valve version. Nothing wrong with that but your fingers do get close to the prop for tuning. The rear needle valve is the more desireable.
Old 11-05-2013 | 05:08 PM
  #23  
whiskykid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

two big thumbs up for gesmale! for stepping upto the plate!
Old 11-05-2013 | 05:12 PM
  #24  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Owatonna, MN
Default

I too have had an ASP .46 and it was a brute of an engine on a mid wing airplane of unknown model. The only issue with it was a carburetor issue where you could not kill the engine due an air leak around the throttle barrel. If you look at the current crop of 91 Super Tigers, they use a similar (if not the same) carb and it has a rubber seal around the throttle arm end. Other than that is performed every bit as strong as the Magnum. That engine was $49 from Sig several years ago and they still offer it.
Old 11-05-2013 | 05:45 PM
  #25  
lopflyers's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Wait........ You want cheap, reliable, start every time engine? Look no further go electric


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.