Second plane
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Osborne,
KS
I am have been flying my LT-40. While the weather
is misbehaving, I'd like to start building my second
plane. I was thinking of a Sig four-star 40 kit.
Is this too aggressive for a second plane? I'd
like my third plane to be a PT-19.
Ideas and opinions greatly valued.
-Darryl
is misbehaving, I'd like to start building my second
plane. I was thinking of a Sig four-star 40 kit.
Is this too aggressive for a second plane? I'd
like my third plane to be a PT-19.
Ideas and opinions greatly valued.
-Darryl
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: SG, SINGAPORE
I heard that the PT19 is a good second plane, only that it is a taildragger, which could be not as easy to land, but so is the 4 star. Many people use the 4 star as a second plane (not me). That's too expensive here, I can only afford something less expensive. Those Vietnamese planes are great seconds! They are cheaaaaap and are quality.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Weirton,
WV
The 4 star is an excellent choice. Great flying plane with no bad habits. Also, the tail dragger configuration will prepare you for the PT-19. Althought the PT-19 is very easy to fly, it's main gear placed further back than the 4 star's, so it will have more of a tendency to nose over if you fly in rough grass.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Calhoun,
LA
I think the 4* or the astro hog is a good choice. You need to get used to a taildragger, most of the planes on the market are taildraggers, and a trainer or another plane with tricycle gear will not prepare you for a taildragger. My 2nd plane is was a somethin extra and I realize now I should have gone with more docile plane.
#5
Banned
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: gone,
The 4*40 is a good choice for a second plane. Able to be trimmed as a primary trainer (can be your FIRST plane!) and able to be adjusted for Fun-Fly or Pattern aerobatics.
Its not the best at any of those... but there's few planes capable of being competitive in Fun-fly, move the CG and change the controls a little... and its competitove for Sortsman (maybe intermediate..) Pattern. Then change the CG and its a trainer again. All with a sport plane built EXACTLY by kit instructions and powered with a mild .40.
Its not the best at any of those... but there's few planes capable of being competitive in Fun-fly, move the CG and change the controls a little... and its competitove for Sortsman (maybe intermediate..) Pattern. Then change the CG and its a trainer again. All with a sport plane built EXACTLY by kit instructions and powered with a mild .40.
#6
It's an old plane but I loved my SIG Kavalier. That would be my vote, but from everything I've read on these pages the 4star is a good choice also.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From:
aimmaintenance, the SIG Kavalier is my alltimes favorite airplane. Other flyers get amazed with the things that I do with Kavaliers, and then those incredibly smoooooth landings like US Air Force pilots landings. I have built probably about 15 Kavaliers, most for customers, and they all say the same after they fly them.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Des moines, IA
You might consider a Goldberg Tiger II, it's a tri-gear plane but you could build in the mounts for tail wheel gear and convert it after you're comfortable with the flying. That should take you right up to your PT-19 by easy steps. I'm going to start laying up my Tiger II this weekend. The 4-Star is a great plane, there's just too many of them around here, I want something a little different!
#10
The 4* is very inexpensive and makes for a great flying plane. For the price you cant beat it and its very easy to build. The Astro Hog flys well but the kit is a pain to build. Big blocks of balsa that you are supposed to carve, sand, and shape into an airplane. The Tiger2 is one of my all time favorites for flying well in a very wide speed range. The plane is larger than the 4* which makes it easy to see but is quite a bit more expensive. For a second plane I would go for the 4*!!!
#11
If you are able to build from plans you might want to concider the "Bingo". It's not too hard to build and a great flyer. It is easy enough to fly that I taught a buddy to fly mine (he was having trouble with his trained and thought the Bingo was easier to fly than the trainer.
The Bingo is very much like the Sig 4* but enouhg different that you will most likely be the only one at the field with one! I power mine with an OS .91 Surpass.
Another plane would be the 4-40 or 4-60, these planes share the same wing platform but is a shoulder wing design, the 4-60 was designed for a 4 stroke 60. All the above planes were designed by Doc. Mathews. I have never build one of his designs that I have not liked, all great flyers.
The Bingo is very much like the Sig 4* but enouhg different that you will most likely be the only one at the field with one! I power mine with an OS .91 Surpass.
Another plane would be the 4-40 or 4-60, these planes share the same wing platform but is a shoulder wing design, the 4-60 was designed for a 4 stroke 60. All the above planes were designed by Doc. Mathews. I have never build one of his designs that I have not liked, all great flyers.
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Corinth, TX
What about the Mid Star. I have got one for my second plane. I got the 4 * 60 for my third! Have a p-47 gold for my fourth. Will not build the last two until probably next fall. I built the mid* as a taildragger and people at my club say it is an awesome performing aircraft if built right and light!!
#17
Just for interest the Bingo is a great flyer but may not be the fastest to build for a second plane. The wing has a double taper which means that it can handle the wind great but it also means the wing ribs take longer to make beacuse of the individual sizes of each rib. Other than that the rest of the plane is a prettty simple build. [8D]
#19
Banned
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: gone,
The Bingo kit is ut of production.
Beautiful airplanes and great performers, but you are stuck with scratch building.
BTW:
RTF = ready to fly (almost never really true... usually takes 2 to 5 hrs of work)
ARF = Almost ready to fly
ARC = structure built... cover it. (close to ARF)
Kit = the box of wood and plans. Get the glue and get to work.
Scratch = you pick out the wood pieces from a list on the plans.
You can separate Scratch into 2 catagories.... Scratch built from (source) plans, or Scratch bult from his own design.
Beautiful airplanes and great performers, but you are stuck with scratch building.BTW:
RTF = ready to fly (almost never really true... usually takes 2 to 5 hrs of work)
ARF = Almost ready to fly
ARC = structure built... cover it. (close to ARF)
Kit = the box of wood and plans. Get the glue and get to work.
Scratch = you pick out the wood pieces from a list on the plans.
You can separate Scratch into 2 catagories.... Scratch built from (source) plans, or Scratch bult from his own design.
#20
Hi, you can get the plans from RCM magazine. Its plan no. 1062. I have included the link to it below. http://www.rcmmagazine.com/e/env/000...ml?command=env[8D]





