Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Do all gas engine planes require 4 channels? >

Do all gas engine planes require 4 channels?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Do all gas engine planes require 4 channels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2003 | 03:54 PM
  #26  
wings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Carrollton, KY
Default Does the Sig LT 40 have ailerons?

Does the Sig LT 40 have ailerons?
Old 09-14-2003 | 08:28 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Rockwall, TX
Default RE: Do all gas engine planes require 4 channels?

Yes the LT-40 has ailerons.[sm=wink.gif]
Old 09-14-2003 | 11:12 PM
  #28  
Red_Jeepster's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Shinglehouse, PA
Default RE: Do all gas engine planes require 4 channels?

Hey Wings,
The LT40 and "belly landings" is not recommended. First, you do go 60-90 MPH, but slow that for landings. Second, you invest a good deal of $$ in an engine and props, if you belly land you'll be replacing props every flight (95% anyway).
Hand launching the LT 40 is almost out of the question, unless you have a mounted too large of an engine. There is a lot of wing that must bite the air in a big hurry to do a hand launch. There is also a lot of prop to worry about. (How are you going to hold a screaming .40 size plane AND a radio, safely?)
So, what to do, what to do.... Ask the local hobby shop if there is anyone in the area that flys. Maybe they can find a spot for you nearby and take you up for a "look-see" and give you an idea of how it will handle.
The comparison to Aerobird won't work. Aerobird weighs next to nothing, and can be floated in. LT 40's have some weight, which translates into forward momentum, which translates into less agility than the Aerobird. Although still, the LT 40 is one of the best Trainers around.
In a nutshell, we are comparing apples to oranges.
There is a much more successful outlook if you just keep asking questions, and learn as much as you can. So far you are off to a good start.
Old 09-15-2003 | 10:38 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Laurel, MD,
Default RE: Do all gas engine planes require 4 channels?

Actually, you can belly land with out ever breaking props. I do it all the time. YOu have to kill the engine before touchdown, and make sure the prop stops horizontal. There are some tricks to mounting the prop so that happens.

That said, the problem with throwing a .40 size plane is that you have to get it safely above stall speed. It's going to weight close to 6lbs. That usually requires a running start and a good two-handed shove. A powerful engine with a 4-5in pitch prop will help, higher pitch props will make it harder.

I got the number of 4-6 times based on what I've seen. I estimate the cruise speed of an Aerobird at around 8-10mph, top speed of maybe 15-20. And LT 40 would typically cruise at around 40-50, with a top speed of 60-70 depending.

You can throttle back, but a glow engine isn't an electric motor. Power output isn't linear, you don't have perfect acceleration, and it takes a noticeable amount of time to increase or decrease power. In addition, you will need full power, or close to it, on takeoff. If you hand-toss, you will absolutly need full power. The torque effects are going to be very different than what you are used to. At low airspeed and high power, the airplane will pull hard to the side.

Most importantly, the stall speed for a plane like the LT-40 is much higher than for a small electric like the Aerobird. If you fly too slow, the controls get very mushy and it becomes very easy to stall in a turn. I'd say your absolute minimum safe speed in level flight is going to be about 25mph with an LT-40. It can be flown slower by experienced pilots, but it's not easy. And getting down to even 25mph is going to take some doing. It's harder than it looks. Last week, we had a pretty good wind going at the field, so I had my students trying to "hover" their trainers. I'd easily do it with their planes to show them how to do it, then they would struggle with it for a while. It actually was a productive exercise, as it improved their landing approaches noticeably. But it wasn't easy for any of them. Lots of stalls or falling off to the side as control authority went away.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.