Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Model plane vs. sim plane >

Model plane vs. sim plane

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Model plane vs. sim plane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2005 | 11:22 AM
  #1  
Kaoma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default Model plane vs. sim plane

Hi guys,
I have a H9 Twist 3D model plane and also the GP Real Flight G2 sim. Which sim plane in the G2 resembles the Twist 3D as flight characteristics the best? I would like to practice on the sim some manuvers before tring on the Twist. Thanks for your help.
Danny.
Old 03-08-2005 | 11:35 AM
  #2  
raideron's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Mohave, AZ
Default RE: Model plane vs. sim plane

I'm not sure about G2... I have AFP... They do help you in stick
movements and such... Don't get me wrong, I think their great
to keep in tune and starting to learn different things... But I do
question how they match up to the real thing... I just picked-up
a used UCD 46.. and I have the same plane on AFP... And I
could not hover it on the sim... But when I took the my plane up
she hovered very easy.... So... IMO... Sims are a great tool!!!
But I'm not sure they match the real deal...
Old 03-08-2005 | 11:48 AM
  #3  
joeb102072's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Coventry , RI
Default RE: Model plane vs. sim plane

Take it all with a grain of salt. Sims are great, some wayyyy better than others (ahhemmmm) IMO G2 is crap and so is G3 but AFP and AFD pro and Deluxe are awesome. Do a thread search on Sim flight physics and it explains all of the reasons in detail and why you will be unpleasantly surprised when you finally get a plane on RF to hover and try it at the field and its not even close. And yes that includes the big downloadable planes for RF too. Nothing on RF G2 can simulate an actual hovering plane, the program lacks the flight physics to recognize prop wash. Among other things thats a major one. They tried to rectify it in G3 but IMO they didnt. And AFP came out with AFD which improved on an already increadible sim for 3D flying. Now granted no sim will exactly duplicate your model at the field because there are too many differences between yours and the computers its just common sense. But to help improve the realism increase the sime speed to 115% and add variable wind not too crazy just enough to simulate thermals and gusts. That will make your learning experiences really sharp. Now I got all of the planes on RF including the downloaded ones to hover and to what I thought quite well too. At the field OMG i almost dumped my morris profile which is by far one of the eaisest 3D planes out there. Then on AFP i used it was like learning all over again but in a different way and in 3 flights at the field I was almost touching the tail. The difference to me wan not that they flew identical it was a totally different way of correcting the plane in a stalled state. Best way I can describe it. Good Luck hope this helps.
Old 03-09-2005 | 07:01 AM
  #4  
tIANci's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Default RE: Model plane vs. sim plane

Real gal vs. Latex Hunny ... get the drift? Oh ... I have NEVER ordered a latex hunny before!!!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.