Model plane vs. sim plane
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Gilbert,
AZ
Hi guys,
I have a H9 Twist 3D model plane and also the GP Real Flight G2 sim. Which sim plane in the G2 resembles the Twist 3D as flight characteristics the best? I would like to practice on the sim some manuvers before tring on the Twist. Thanks for your help.
Danny.
I have a H9 Twist 3D model plane and also the GP Real Flight G2 sim. Which sim plane in the G2 resembles the Twist 3D as flight characteristics the best? I would like to practice on the sim some manuvers before tring on the Twist. Thanks for your help.
Danny.
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fort Mohave,
AZ
I'm not sure about G2... I have AFP... They do help you in stick
movements and such... Don't get me wrong, I think their great
to keep in tune and starting to learn different things... But I do
question how they match up to the real thing... I just picked-up
a used UCD 46.. and I have the same plane on AFP... And I
could not hover it on the sim... But when I took the my plane up
she hovered very easy.... So... IMO... Sims are a great tool!!!
But I'm not sure they match the real deal...
movements and such... Don't get me wrong, I think their great
to keep in tune and starting to learn different things... But I do
question how they match up to the real thing... I just picked-up
a used UCD 46.. and I have the same plane on AFP... And I
could not hover it on the sim... But when I took the my plane up
she hovered very easy.... So... IMO... Sims are a great tool!!!
But I'm not sure they match the real deal...
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Coventry , RI
Take it all with a grain of salt. Sims are great, some wayyyy better than others (ahhemmmm) IMO G2 is crap and so is G3 but AFP and AFD pro and Deluxe are awesome. Do a thread search on Sim flight physics and it explains all of the reasons in detail and why you will be unpleasantly surprised when you finally get a plane on RF to hover and try it at the field and its not even close. And yes that includes the big downloadable planes for RF too. Nothing on RF G2 can simulate an actual hovering plane, the program lacks the flight physics to recognize prop wash. Among other things thats a major one. They tried to rectify it in G3 but IMO they didnt. And AFP came out with AFD which improved on an already increadible sim for 3D flying. Now granted no sim will exactly duplicate your model at the field because there are too many differences between yours and the computers its just common sense. But to help improve the realism increase the sime speed to 115% and add variable wind not too crazy just enough to simulate thermals and gusts. That will make your learning experiences really sharp. Now I got all of the planes on RF including the downloaded ones to hover and to what I thought quite well too. At the field OMG i almost dumped my morris profile which is by far one of the eaisest 3D planes out there. Then on AFP i used it was like learning all over again but in a different way and in 3 flights at the field I was almost touching the tail. The difference to me wan not that they flew identical it was a totally different way of correcting the plane in a stalled state. Best way I can describe it. Good Luck hope this helps.



