How do you estimate height?
#4
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Voorhees,
NJ
ORIGINAL: efergie72
Just curious as to why you need to get a heigth estimate?
Just curious as to why you need to get a heigth estimate?
#5
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
ORIGINAL: paul_c
For one reason, I've been looking at sailplanes, and people talk about reaching "x" number of feet in 60 seconds, etc. Just wondering how they are coming up with these numbers.
ORIGINAL: efergie72
Just curious as to why you need to get a heigth estimate?
Just curious as to why you need to get a heigth estimate?
Fly-guy
#6
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Voorhees,
NJ
ORIGINAL: Fly-guy
ever heard of an eagletree Flight data recorder? Google it then you will know how.
Fly-guy
ORIGINAL: paul_c
For one reason, I've been looking at sailplanes, and people talk about reaching "x" number of feet in 60 seconds, etc. Just wondering how they are coming up with these numbers.
ORIGINAL: efergie72
Just curious as to why you need to get a heigth estimate?
Just curious as to why you need to get a heigth estimate?
Fly-guy
#7
Height and distance are the most difficult things for a person to judge. I have heard of people saying " I flew my model to 2000 feet the other day". I would suspect that most people would overestimate height. I have flown over my model field at 1500 feet and the models on the ground were little specks. Way to far away to control properly.
#8
Senior Member
Our runway is 200' long, so I try to visualize the number of runway lengths (or fractions) above ground. Crude, but it works (I think).
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jewett, NY,
Estimating hieght and or distance accurately usually requires a reference. Britbrat uses the runnway I use the tree line surrounding the field.
#10
Junior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aurora,
IL
ORIGINAL: britbrat
Our runway is 200' long, so I try to visualize the number of runway lengths (or fractions) above ground. Crude, but it works (I think).
Our runway is 200' long, so I try to visualize the number of runway lengths (or fractions) above ground. Crude, but it works (I think).
#11
Junior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aurora,
IL
ORIGINAL: Crashem
Estimating hieght and or distance accurately usually requires a reference. Britbrat uses the runnway I use the tree line surrounding the field.
Estimating hieght and or distance accurately usually requires a reference. Britbrat uses the runnway I use the tree line surrounding the field.
#12

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Windsor,
CT
For sailplanes I have seen people use reference cards that they hold at arms length. You match the picture on the card with the apparent size of your sailplane and it gives you an estimate of the height (or distance from you). I think they made these cards up themselves. I don't know if they can be purchased.
You could easily do it by setting the sailplane on the ground with its nose toward you and measure out a distance like 100 feet, then hold up an index card at arms length so that it looks to be just under the plane and mark the ends of the wingtips on the card and write 100 feet under it. Repeat for other distances.
Not too accurate but it's cheap.
You could easily do it by setting the sailplane on the ground with its nose toward you and measure out a distance like 100 feet, then hold up an index card at arms length so that it looks to be just under the plane and mark the ends of the wingtips on the card and write 100 feet under it. Repeat for other distances.
Not too accurate but it's cheap.
#13

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Forth Smith, AR
I haven't got a plane yet but a piece of advise I heard was to fly as high as you can comforatbly see the plane. Meaning still being able to tell the direction and not give you neck pains when you do venture closer to your position.
The guy who told me that was training someone that day. The plane was some high wing homebuilt trainer that had a 76" wingspan and the plane looked as small as a parkflyer they had it so high.
I think that'll be my rule of thumb when I start crashing... err, flying.
The guy who told me that was training someone that day. The plane was some high wing homebuilt trainer that had a 76" wingspan and the plane looked as small as a parkflyer they had it so high.

I think that'll be my rule of thumb when I start crashing... err, flying.
#14
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Voorhees,
NJ
ORIGINAL: Commander_Drake
For sailplanes I have seen people use reference cards that they hold at arms length. You match the picture on the card with the apparent size of your sailplane and it gives you an estimate of the height (or distance from you). I think they made these cards up themselves. I don't know if they can be purchased.
You could easily do it by setting the sailplane on the ground with its nose toward you and measure out a distance like 100 feet, then hold up an index card at arms length so that it looks to be just under the plane and mark the ends of the wingtips on the card and write 100 feet under it. Repeat for other distances.
Not too accurate but it's cheap.
For sailplanes I have seen people use reference cards that they hold at arms length. You match the picture on the card with the apparent size of your sailplane and it gives you an estimate of the height (or distance from you). I think they made these cards up themselves. I don't know if they can be purchased.
You could easily do it by setting the sailplane on the ground with its nose toward you and measure out a distance like 100 feet, then hold up an index card at arms length so that it looks to be just under the plane and mark the ends of the wingtips on the card and write 100 feet under it. Repeat for other distances.
Not too accurate but it's cheap.
Thank you all, good info. I like Commander_Drake's idea. I might try this with a slow sailplane that I'm getting; any other plane might be too difficult (I usually need both hands on the controls!)
#15

My Feedback: (11)
As you can see, most people use the WAG method. In all realistics, if you don't use some sort of data recorder that uses a GPS or something to measure dist acurately, you won't be close. I have had people call the tower many times when I am doing jobs over town and they always say we are 50 feet above their roof. The tower usaully tells me about the call, but I am on radar and am at between 1000 and 1500 usually.
Very very few can accurately judge distance when it gets more than a few feet from them.
Very very few can accurately judge distance when it gets more than a few feet from them.
#18

My Feedback: (11)
ORIGINAL: britbrat
Golfers are pretty good at measuring horizontal distances. I can tell when my plane is a 5 iron away.
Golfers are pretty good at measuring horizontal distances. I can tell when my plane is a 5 iron away.
Never thought of that, but then when I go to a new course, I suck at it again, so I think it goes back to the point of ref. I know the course pretty well at the lake, so I can do it well there, but the ones here, I can never get it right because I only play them once or twice a year. the 150 bush moves every time I get to it so I can never hit the green. Yea, thats it.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Macon,
GA
If you spot a tall communications tower drive to it, if possible. The tower owner and a tower number will be on the fence. You can then use your friendly Internet and Google to find the company and the data for that tower. I found that the one behind my office is 540 feet tall. I look at it frequently and try to take that reference to the flying field.
Our flying field is within a couple of miles of an airport. Purportedly, we are supposed to not fly over 400 feet (and so you know that never happens.) This has lead to several discussions at the field about how high 400 feet was. So when I'm on break behind the office I studied this communications tower that is approximately 1/4 mile from the office. One day we used a laser range finder and trigonometry to estimate a height of just over 500 feet for the tower. I didn't believe the estimate - I didn't think it could be that tall - but we rechecked the calcs - and eventually I drove over to the tower and got information from the gate that enabled me to look the tower up on the Internet and get all its vitals.
All I can say is that when you translate that tower height to our flying field, 400 feet ain't very high.
I've heard that on occasion the control tower has sent the sheriff's department over to the field to caution R/C flyers to fly lower. Our field is not under the usual landing pattern, but sometimes we have Cessnas coming right over us on their base leg and we start screaming "Full Scale! Full Scale!"
Our flying field is within a couple of miles of an airport. Purportedly, we are supposed to not fly over 400 feet (and so you know that never happens.) This has lead to several discussions at the field about how high 400 feet was. So when I'm on break behind the office I studied this communications tower that is approximately 1/4 mile from the office. One day we used a laser range finder and trigonometry to estimate a height of just over 500 feet for the tower. I didn't believe the estimate - I didn't think it could be that tall - but we rechecked the calcs - and eventually I drove over to the tower and got information from the gate that enabled me to look the tower up on the Internet and get all its vitals.
All I can say is that when you translate that tower height to our flying field, 400 feet ain't very high.

I've heard that on occasion the control tower has sent the sheriff's department over to the field to caution R/C flyers to fly lower. Our field is not under the usual landing pattern, but sometimes we have Cessnas coming right over us on their base leg and we start screaming "Full Scale! Full Scale!"
#25
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Voorhees,
NJ
ORIGINAL: rcjon
If you spot a tall communications tower drive to it, if possible. The tower owner and a tower number will be on the fence. You can then use your friendly Internet and Google to find the company and the data for that tower. I found that the one behind my office is 540 feet tall. I look at it frequently and try to take that reference to the flying field.
Our flying field is within a couple of miles of an airport. Purportedly, we are supposed to not fly over 400 feet (and so you know that never happens.) This has lead to several discussions at the field about how high 400 feet was. So when I'm on break behind the office I studied this communications tower that is approximately 1/4 mile from the office. One day we used a laser range finder and trigonometry to estimate a height of just over 500 feet for the tower. I didn't believe the estimate - I didn't think it could be that tall - but we rechecked the calcs - and eventually I drove over to the tower and got information from the gate that enabled me to look the tower up on the Internet and get all its vitals.
All I can say is that when you translate that tower height to our flying field, 400 feet ain't very high.
I've heard that on occasion the control tower has sent the sheriff's department over to the field to caution R/C flyers to fly lower. Our field is not under the usual landing pattern, but sometimes we have Cessnas coming right over us on their base leg and we start screaming "Full Scale! Full Scale!"
If you spot a tall communications tower drive to it, if possible. The tower owner and a tower number will be on the fence. You can then use your friendly Internet and Google to find the company and the data for that tower. I found that the one behind my office is 540 feet tall. I look at it frequently and try to take that reference to the flying field.
Our flying field is within a couple of miles of an airport. Purportedly, we are supposed to not fly over 400 feet (and so you know that never happens.) This has lead to several discussions at the field about how high 400 feet was. So when I'm on break behind the office I studied this communications tower that is approximately 1/4 mile from the office. One day we used a laser range finder and trigonometry to estimate a height of just over 500 feet for the tower. I didn't believe the estimate - I didn't think it could be that tall - but we rechecked the calcs - and eventually I drove over to the tower and got information from the gate that enabled me to look the tower up on the Internet and get all its vitals.
All I can say is that when you translate that tower height to our flying field, 400 feet ain't very high.

I've heard that on occasion the control tower has sent the sheriff's department over to the field to caution R/C flyers to fly lower. Our field is not under the usual landing pattern, but sometimes we have Cessnas coming right over us on their base leg and we start screaming "Full Scale! Full Scale!"


