Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Third Plane Looking >

Third Plane Looking

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Third Plane Looking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2005 | 08:05 PM
  #26  
bubbagates's Avatar
My Feedback: (32)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Elizabethtown, PA
Default RE: Third Plane Looking


ORIGINAL: xoon

FUNTANA!!!! hehe.. always wanted one, don't have the money yet... the wing spand is 56" one inch more

That's actually a very good suggestion, especially if you can afford the 90 size. The 46 size is great, but the 90 size is better. I have flown both, and own the 90 with a YS110...[X(]
Old 05-01-2005 | 08:28 PM
  #27  
Pilot Chad's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Madison, AL
Default RE: Third Plane Looking

bubba, my friends just got a 40 ARF, and it looked NICE. I will probably fly it and grab the 90 size. I want a big plane. (After the four star)
Old 05-02-2005 | 11:11 PM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , NJ
Default RE: Third Plane Looking

You know what bubba, I think i changed my mind! lol. I actually now am thinking for a bigger size than a 40.. I'm thinking of getting a 60 sized plane. I think it will handle better in wind cause i'm a all season flyer. Do you think a U CAN DO 60 sized would be better than a 40 size? Offcourse I would get a .60 or the 91 sized engine.. what do ya think?
Old 05-04-2005 | 09:09 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Antonio, TX
Default RE: Third Plane Looking

The overall geometry and appearance of the Razor and the Goldberg Matrix are the same. I have the Matrix. It is impressive for such a small plane. Flies really straight and true for beautiful pattern practice and on high rates, snaps and everything else is so fast, it's scary. If the Razor flies like the matix, you would be pleased. I think the Matrix has a little larger wing span and cost a little less too.
Old 05-04-2005 | 09:43 AM
  #30  
bubbagates's Avatar
My Feedback: (32)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Elizabethtown, PA
Default RE: Third Plane Looking

NJ,

As far as the 60 sized being better, yep, Bigger will handle wind better. You will also find that larger planes are easier to see and just plain feel better on the sticks, but along with bigger is bigger cost.

Take a 4* 40 up in 10mph winds and land it crosswind and it will fight you some. Now take a 4*60 up in hte same wind and watch it land very much the same as with no wind, minus the need to be a little faster on landing.

Again all of this my opinion
Old 05-04-2005 | 11:14 AM
  #31  
zope_pope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Aurora, CO
Default RE: Third Plane Looking

I will go out on a limb here. The DPM Ultimate 1.20 has two 60" wings, flies really tamely on low rates with a smaller engine, and goes balistic with a big engine on it. Its a little bit pricey, but well worth it. It flies like its on rails. Come to think of it though, its more suitable for a 4th airplane, but just keep it in mind. My favorite airplane by far and it was my fourth plane. Picked it up easily after flying my GP Ulty around (another really nice flyer). One thing is definately for sure though, BIG AIRPLANES DO FLY BETTER. They are easier to see, fly better in the wind, and just are super fun.
Just my .02 cents.
Old 05-04-2005 | 01:14 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Antonio, TX
Default RE: Third Plane Looking

I have a UCD .46 and had a UCD .60. The later had a 1.08 FSR in it and it rocked. It flew really well but definitely requires good (costly) servos. The .46 actually flew in the wind just as well. The two airplanes are not the same at all. The .46 has the horizontal stab in line with the wing, the .60 has it above. I thought the .60 flew pattern type moves better, but the .46 is much quicker on the tight snaps, 3D stuff and so on. Don't eliminate the .46 due to wind. I have flown mine in 20-25 with gusts to 30. No problem flying it, just difficult on landings, but once you get used to it you can harrier it to you feet in a stiff wind, kill the engine and catch it before it blows away. The biggest problem I had in high wind, was taking the wings off for transporting it.

Many of the 3D capable .46 sized planes with long tail moments do well in the wind. It's the short moment planes you have to watch out for. They tend to flip over easily near the ground shear.

Good luck!!!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.