2 stroke or 4 stroke?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Belle Chasse,
LA
Greetings,
I would like to know what opinions there are about whether to use a 2 or 4 stroke in a sport ship I built from plans. It is called a fantasy and I have never seen it before, can't find anything on the web either. I would say it is a large 40 to 60 size but has a small engine bay. I love the sound of the 4 strokes but am unsure of what size 4 stroke would get the job done in a small space. It currently has a magnum 40 in it, little tight on the fit, and on the maiden flight the instructor said it felt under powered, so I am looking at the .52 size engines; 4 and 2 stroke. Any ideas?
vr/
Kevin
I would like to know what opinions there are about whether to use a 2 or 4 stroke in a sport ship I built from plans. It is called a fantasy and I have never seen it before, can't find anything on the web either. I would say it is a large 40 to 60 size but has a small engine bay. I love the sound of the 4 strokes but am unsure of what size 4 stroke would get the job done in a small space. It currently has a magnum 40 in it, little tight on the fit, and on the maiden flight the instructor said it felt under powered, so I am looking at the .52 size engines; 4 and 2 stroke. Any ideas?
vr/
Kevin
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Taipei, TAIWAN
i believe it's the same plane as the skyshark fantasy. use to quite promoted on RCU but has been quiet for a while. it is an older design that skyshark now kits for the diyer.
http://www.skysharkrc.com/fantasy.htm
you will see that your engine is not even in the recommended range. although i am not an advocate for overpowering planes, i do tend to lean toward the larger of the recommended engines. i would say at least go for an OS FS-70SII or a saito 82 both 4-strokes. i think you'll have a really hard time shoe-horning a 91 in there but you can try. a magnum or tt 91, both great engines. for 2-strokes, a 52 would be fine but i'd go for the O.S. 46AX... one of the best engines available. a ~75 would be good, too.
but it would also depend on how heavy your plane is. each builder will tend to build differently. my attempts at building were always a lb over the designed weight. made for less than stellar performance :-)
what intrigues me is how you have the plane balanced with a 40? would seem to me that it would be very tail heavy...
http://www.skysharkrc.com/fantasy.htm
you will see that your engine is not even in the recommended range. although i am not an advocate for overpowering planes, i do tend to lean toward the larger of the recommended engines. i would say at least go for an OS FS-70SII or a saito 82 both 4-strokes. i think you'll have a really hard time shoe-horning a 91 in there but you can try. a magnum or tt 91, both great engines. for 2-strokes, a 52 would be fine but i'd go for the O.S. 46AX... one of the best engines available. a ~75 would be good, too.
but it would also depend on how heavy your plane is. each builder will tend to build differently. my attempts at building were always a lb over the designed weight. made for less than stellar performance :-)
what intrigues me is how you have the plane balanced with a 40? would seem to me that it would be very tail heavy...
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (50)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mira Mesa, CA
Well if the Magnum-40 is a tight fit larger engines are gonna be REAL tight! I like the TT Pro-46 for 2 cycles and as mentioned a Saito-72/82 if it'll fit-
Nice brd!
Nice brd!
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: , AK
I put a tower pipe on my OS .46fx for $15 and gained 500-600 rpm. It turns a 12x4 at 13400 on my setup. That would be a lot stronger than what you have and it should fit fine.
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Belle Chasse,
LA
I knew I'd find the answer here. You are absolutly right forestroke, that is the plane. I think I'll take some measurements and get technical about this engine install. Thanks for all the help everyone.
Kevin
Kevin
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Springtown,
TX
A saito .72 has the same mounting demensions as a saito .56. The .82 (I believe) has the same footprint as the .100. I doubt you could get the .82 in, but the .72 would probably fit nicely. I installed a .72 in my contender which also is a very tight fit, and it went in perfectly. Plenty of power, as well!
#10
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Toledo,
OH
The .82 saito is the same block as the .72 same weight even it just has more power. However the bore is the same as the 100 it is the stroke that changed.



