Is an os .46 fx suitable for a sig LT-40?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tolland, CT
Which engine would you put in a sig LT-40? An os surpass .52 or an os .46fx? I already have both engines(picked them up real cheap, brand new) Keep in mind I am just learning to fly. Thanks
Tim
Tim
#3

My Feedback: (47)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Benton,
IL
I've flown several with the OS 46 fx/ax engines and they are excellent. I have flown one with a MAG 52 four-stroke [close to an OS52] and it was ok but not as good as the OS46. While most OS engines are easy to tune the 2 stroke would be a shorter learning curve.
FEB
FEB
#4
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
You can use either of the two engines. Of the two the 46 is going to give you more power than the 52 4-stroke will. IMHO I would put the 46 on it as the 52 may be lower side of power, while the 46 will give you more power. Geez, I sound like Tim Taylor now "More Power!!!!! ugggggg ugggggg!!!!!" 
Ken

Ken
#5
A friend of mine had the .46FX/LT-40 combination. They were a very good match. I used a .52 Surpass on my Avistar and this was a good match also. I think the Avistar is lighter than an LT-40 though.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tracy,
CA
I not sure but I beleive the LT-40 & the NexStar are similar in size & weight. I have the stock OS 46FXI engine that came with the NexStar & flies it effortlessy at half throttle. Very easy to tune, extremely reliable & never skips a bit. As a new recently soloed Rc pilot, these things are important to me, never a deadstick yet. And when I am feeling a little bold & cob the throttle, it really gets up & goes.
#8
I have the 46ax in my Lt40 and have found it to be more than adequate. More importantly, it's simple and very reliable-more flying, less fiddeling!
#10
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
Here are the specs for the 2 planes
Nexstar:
Sig LT-40
So yes, they are very similar.
Ken
Nexstar:
SPECS: Wingspan: 68.75" (1746mm)
Wing Area: 722 sq in (46sq dm)
Weight: 6.5 lb (2930g) ready to fly
Wing Loading: 21 oz/sq ft (63g/sq dm)
Length: 56" (1420mm)
Wing Area: 722 sq in (46sq dm)
Weight: 6.5 lb (2930g) ready to fly
Wing Loading: 21 oz/sq ft (63g/sq dm)
Length: 56" (1420mm)
SPECS: Wingspan: 70"
Wing area: 900 sq in.
Weight: 5.5 - 6 lbs.
Wing Loading: 14-15 oz/sq ft
Length: 56"
Wing area: 900 sq in.
Weight: 5.5 - 6 lbs.
Wing Loading: 14-15 oz/sq ft
Length: 56"
Ken
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Martinsville,
IN
both are a great engine, both will fly your LT-40 very well... you must now ask yourself this question.... which sounds better?
I personally love the sound of a 4stroke, too bad I don't own one. My LT-40 has a TT46pro on it, and it flies great.
it boils down to personal preference with those two engines.
I personally love the sound of a 4stroke, too bad I don't own one. My LT-40 has a TT46pro on it, and it flies great.
it boils down to personal preference with those two engines.
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Dorado SpringsMissouri
ORIGINAL: Mxer82
Which engine would you put in a sig LT-40? An os surpass .52 or an os .46fx? I already have both engines(picked them up real cheap, brand new) Keep in mind I am just learning to fly. Thanks
Tim
Which engine would you put in a sig LT-40? An os surpass .52 or an os .46fx? I already have both engines(picked them up real cheap, brand new) Keep in mind I am just learning to fly. Thanks
Tim





