Hello everyone,
I wanted to know little more about the US Aircore Colt. Right now I have a Durastik and like it a lot even though it does not glide well and does not have the best flight characteristics. I do not like to be stressed out to crash expensive planes thats why I am going with the indestructible planes like Duraplane.
Now I am looking to get another plane and the Colt seems to be the one. Also what is the difference between high and low wings?
Thank you guys,
Valdis

I have flown a few of these planes for club members. The Colt flies very well. It will be a much better flying plane than the Durastick. The color doesn't last very well with glow fuel. Vinyl graphic film will take care of that though. You won't have to work so hard to keep it in the air and it is very durable. It would work well for an aerobatic trainer.

EXCAP232

A guy crashed one of those Colt's at our field about a month ago.....straight into the woods from about 150 feet up at full throttle.....very minimal damage...I couldn't believe it!!

Mike

At the risk of being called a SPAD zealot, I would suggest that you have a look at the possibility of building a SPAD. Have a look at www.spadtothebone.com . There is also a SPAD sub-forum at RCU if you have questions or need further information. Just another alternative for a great flying, inexpensive, durable airframe. Not for everyone, but worth a look.

Ross

The colt was what got me into spads. I got about three flights in it before stripping the gear off for a SPAD debby. The colt was fun, I would do the shorter wing if you get it, the longer one really weights her down. The longer wing flies like a trainer. But slower. Still have the shell. I did stick it in the ground once in an failed elevator on the downward journey of a loop. She did pull out ok, a little dirty, and the front a little crumpled, but repairable. If you want a really fun sized 40 plane and plastic make a SPAD SPAZZLER. Very fun plane.

Well with whatever you try, hope you have a blast.

Thank you guys for response.
I really like the SPADS and think they are very good and durable planes. I would build one myself, but I hate to build stuff and do not have time for that. I would rather buy one.

The Colt is a whole 'lotta fun! I had one for years, and I can honestly say it's been my favorite airplane. Put 2 servos in the wings, and move the CG way, way back. Knife-edge spins were a favorite of mine with that, along with different tumbles. It also slows to a fast walk for landing.

I'd have no qualms about recommending one to anyone, and would suggest a powerful .46 or better for an engine.

From the original question:

Also what is the difference between high and low wings?

As a general rule a high wing is considered more stable (trainer type) and the low wing more aerobatic. Other factors enter the equation such as airfoil (flat bottom for trainer and symmetrical for aerobatics). Aircraft design is always a compromise. More stability = less maneuverability and vice versa.

EXCAP232