Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Engine rating and quality >

Engine rating and quality

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Engine rating and quality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2008 | 04:52 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: hermitage, AR
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

what is your coparison of the v-MAR engines have one that starts with flip by spinner in reverse. essed it up breaking in (new to this) they put short block in it for $35 brokein right nest time
Old 05-07-2008 | 04:58 PM
  #27  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

Huh. What? [sm=confused.gif]
Old 05-07-2008 | 05:55 PM
  #28  
bigedmustafa's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

I didn't mention several brands in my previous post. VMax engines from Richmond RC are supposed to be good solid values by most all accounts. I also didn't mention the SK line of engines sold by KangkeUSA, but they're also excellent performers for a budget line of engines.

Nathan King's comments about Thunder Tiger are kind of an inside joke. Nathan and I were trying to get my F-91s started on my Ace Staudacher S-300 last fall and just couldn't get it to fire. It turned out that the spinner backplate had gotten stripped and we were flipping the prop without turning the crankshaft over. Couldn't really blame that on the engine!
Old 05-07-2008 | 08:13 PM
  #29  
Jetdesign's Avatar
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,056
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Honolulu, HI
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

I have the OS46AX. It is my first experience with a glow powered engine. I was able to break in my engine in one tank of fuel, and had it in the air for the second tank. It had loads of power and operated without a hitch. Acceleration from idle to full throttle was really smooth, and it idled very smooth as well. It now starts with one simple spin from a chicken stick.

The ease, reliability, and dependability of this engine are remarkable. Guys at the field were having all sorts of engine problems, dead sticks, etc. And, the OS46AX has a newly designed muffler that makes it sound great!

While I have no experience with any other engines, I really don't even want to bother. OS (2 stroke) is the way to go, IMO.
Old 05-07-2008 | 09:07 PM
  #30  
Nathan King's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

Yeah, it was a joke. Thunder Tiger engines run really well from my observations.
Old 05-07-2008 | 09:08 PM
  #31  
Insanemoondoggie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,475
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Altamont, MO
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

Saito and JohnDeere , both stump pullers .
Old 05-07-2008 | 09:39 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Guelph, ON,
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

webra is all i've been buying lately, they are reliable with great carbs, powerful and last a long time. Haven't bothered with OS much but they seem to run reliably with average power and weight.
Old 05-07-2008 | 11:02 PM
  #33  
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,117
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Port Crane, NY
Default RE: Engine rating and quality

ORIGINAL: Insanemoondoggie

Saito and JohnDeere , both stump pullers .
And 35% overpriced for the marketing expenses alone. ;-)

My 1956 Ford 640. 30 Hp and gobs of torque. Just had to take her in for her 50 year service - new brakes and rims. Bummer.

There are OS and there are OS. The LA series are snoozers. The AX is great and the FS four stroke is a torqie engine for the $. I'd take a Thunder Tiger Pro-46 over any of the .40 to .46 OS engines. It's got power and longevity at the right price point.



Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw66466.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	33.3 KB
ID:	945323  
Old 05-08-2008 | 06:03 AM
  #34  
Insanemoondoggie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,475
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Altamont, MO
Default RE: Engine rating and quality


ORIGINAL: Charlie P.

ORIGINAL: Insanemoondoggie

Saito and JohnDeere , both stump pullers .
And 35% overpriced for the marketing expenses alone. ;-)

My 1956 Ford 640. 30 Hp and gobs of torque. Just had to take her in for her 50 year service - new brakes and rims. Bummer.

There are OS and there are OS. The LA series are snoozers. The AX is great and the FS four stroke is a torqie engine for the $. I'd take a Thunder Tiger Pro-46 over any of the .40 to .46 OS engines. It's got power and longevity at the right price point.



I knew better , than to give an opinion , thats why I have`nt been posting for the last 3 months . You`ll notice , I did`nt slam anyone's opinion. Just common courtesy.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.