Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Control surface torque question. >

Control surface torque question.

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Control surface torque question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2008 | 05:41 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA
Default Control surface torque question.

Hi guys

I am whipping together a Great PLanes Big Stik 40. I have three HS-325 standard servo's and two HS-635 high torque servo's at my disposal.

I know high torque servo's are OVERKILL on a plane like this but I might as well use them as opposed to buying new ones.

My question: Which control surface needs the most torque? I can either use the 635's on the ailerons and the 325's on the rudder elevator and throttle, or I can use the 325's on the ailerons and the 635's on elevator and rudder.

Not quite sure what the optimal choice would be here.

Marcel



Old 07-24-2008 | 05:54 AM
  #2  
HeliTB's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Washington, MD
Default RE: Control surface torque question.

I have Sig Kougar with Hitec 325s on the aileron, throttle, elevator and the 635 for the rudder and nose wheel. If your elevator control surface is big, I would use the 635 on it. Since one servo controls the rudder and the nose wheel I would use the 635 there as well, since it has to control two surfaces (more torque needed).

325s - ailerons, throttle
635s - rudder/nose wheel, elevator

If both ailerons are controlled by one servo I would use the 635 there instead of the elevator and put a 325 on the elevator.
Old 07-24-2008 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
MinnFlyer's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Willmar, MN
Default RE: Control surface torque question.

It is similar to saying, "My right arm is stronger than my left arm, and I have to lift a pocket knife and a set of keys - which hand should I use for each?"

Either servo is going to be more than enough to do any of the jobs you're tasking them to do.

That said, if it is a tail dragger, I would use the 635's on the ailerons. If it has a nose wheel, I'd use them on rudder and elevator.
Old 07-24-2008 | 08:53 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA
Default RE: Control surface torque question.

I know the servo's are too much, but those happen to be the only ones I have, so why not use them. Supose it would really not make a diference at the endo of the day on a 40 sized stik anyway.

Well, the Stik has one servo per aileron, and a nose wheel, so I agree what HeliTB (And you) mentioned.

The 325's on the ailerons and throttle, and the 635's on the rudder and elevator.
Old 07-24-2008 | 07:51 PM
  #5  
JohnBuckner's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,441
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Kingman, AZ
Default RE: Control surface torque question.


ORIGINAL: RappyPilot

Not quite sure what the optimal choice would be here.

Assuming the Stick lives a long and fruitful life and who does not wish for that, does make the assumption that the flight pack components will stay in the airplane and not be robbed for the next 'Bigger & Better' which if you will admit you probably have already been thinking about.

That next 'Bigger & Better' may actually be an airplane that can benefit from the expensive servos unlike your stick that really does not care what kind of standard you stick in there. Soooo with that in mind temptation to strip your relatively new and great flying stick will be strong and you just might not get back to it, ever just because 'Oh its missing a couple of servos.

In my opinion Stripping an old airplane for a newer one is usually the death knell and it would be a lot better simply to invest in one more Hs-325 and one HS-85 for throttle and save the heavy metal for the next 'Bigger & Better', Heck you just may end up with both airplanes in commision at the same time and a choice of what to fly. Now theres a concept.

John
Old 07-25-2008 | 12:57 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA
Default RE: Control surface torque question.

Talking abou that.

I have a Calmato. Quite a boring plane and was tempted to take those servo's out. But as you said, once you do that the plane ends up in your hanger never to fly again ... So I am keeping the servo's in there.

Would an HS-85 be enough for a 50 class engine? I have 5 lying around that I stripped from a GP Spitfire that "went down" so if I use the HS-85 for the throttle I only need 2 325's and I am set and I can keep the 635 for that "next bigger" plane :-)
Old 07-25-2008 | 08:03 AM
  #7  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,266
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default RE: Control surface torque question.

Using a higher torque servo on the rudder/nose wheel lessens the chance of stripping the gears on a bad landing since high torque gears are stronger.
Old 07-25-2008 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
JohnBuckner's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,441
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Kingman, AZ
Default RE: Control surface torque question.

Yes the HS 85 is fine for throttle virtually on anything. It is what I use for all my throttles and I average about twenty five aircraft that are always ready to fly plug and play. The numbers vary slightly but that is about averge.

John

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.