Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Giles 202:  How advanced? >

Giles 202: How advanced?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Giles 202: How advanced?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2009 | 01:16 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default Giles 202: How advanced?

I just ordered a Cox Giles 202, but probably won't plan on flying it this year because I may not be able to replace it should something happen. I am not 100% certain of my ability to handle a fast high wing-loading mid-wing sport plane like this just yet. For that reason, I would like to consider something that has similar characteristics, yet is more commonly available both in airframes and parts that would also offer a reasonable ease of repair. Although I am well versed on my Great Planes Rapture 40, I have read elsewhere that a Giles tends to be very demanding and unforgiving, with a wicked snap. And for that reason, requires expert-level skills to fly successfully. Has anybody here had experience with any make or version of the Giles 202? Which planes would you recommend as a prerequisite?

NorfolkSouthern
Old 01-02-2009 | 09:23 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Meadville, PA
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

Don't worry about flying this plane. I was nervous when I took mine up the first time but I was amazed at how stable it flew. The only real problem is that it is a small plane and gets small in the air quick. But then I need new glasses.
Old 01-02-2009 | 09:41 AM
  #3  
bigedmustafa's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

Agreed. The Cox Giles 202 .40 ARF is more of a sport/scale ARF rather than a true scale aerobat. It's more forgiving and more stable than a number of other Giles 202 ARFs on the market.

If you are very comfortable flying a low wing sport plane like the Rapture .40, the Cox Giles 202 .40 ARF should be a very minor step up.
Old 01-02-2009 | 09:59 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

Thanks, pkevinb and bigedmustafa. I'm going to see if I can add a second Giles to the one I'm already purchasing, but that will depend on how well the stock holds out over the weekend. Wish me luck!

NorfolkSouthern
Old 01-03-2009 | 11:14 AM
  #5  
Nathan King's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?


ORIGINAL: bigedmustafa

Agreed. The Cox Giles 202 .40 ARF is more of a sport/scale ARF rather than a true scale aerobat. It's more forgiving and more stable than a number of other Giles 202 ARFs on the market.

If you are very comfortable flying a low wing sport plane like the Rapture .40, the Cox Giles 202 .40 ARF should be a very minor step up.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Old 01-05-2009 | 02:31 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

Funds have shown a very slight improvement, so I ordered a second ARF to serve as a spare, should the first one suffer something unexpected, which I don't anticipate due to my habit of taking planes down for maintenance over minor issues. My airplanes are starting to breed like rabbits, and it seems they have taken over the apartment.

Another question: How does the Giles compare to an Edge, Extra, or Cap? How would it handle differently from a Cessna, and which of the two would likely need more speed to land?

NorfolkSouthern
Old 01-08-2009 | 05:17 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Sun City Center, FL
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

I know nothing about the Cox Giles and from your replies it doesn't appear to be a giles 202 that I've had in past. To my knowlegde the Cox aircraft are small perhaps what I call toy aircraft? Anyway if the others you mention are similiar I am of no help. Those I am familiar with are 46 - 60 or larger size full pattern type planes all of which require a lot of skill/experience to fly. So guess what I need to know is what size/type planes are you inquiring about, and what experience do you have?
Old 01-08-2009 | 06:17 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

TedMo: I'm referring to the ARF that Cox had on sale, which an OS .46 AX engine would be compatible with. The wings are of a similar style to those of a pattern plane, except they're shorter and have a slightly longer cord. The wingloading is approximately 28 ounces. The link is here: http://www.coxmodels.com/prodinfo.asp?number=006101 .

NorfolkSouthern
Old 04-13-2009 | 04:06 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Effort , PA
Default RE: Giles 202: How advanced?

I have a Cox giles 202 but haven't flown it yet. The book says the CG is 3and 5eights back form the leading edge but a lot of guys say they are going back as far as 5 inches any thoughts.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.