Falcon 56 Mark II, engine choice
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Centennial,
CO
I am building the Falcon 56 Mark II that I have had for 10 years. It's my first build. I will be using a revolution 46 AX. Will this be too much engine for the plane?
#4

My Feedback: (16)
Back when I was in my early twenties some 40 years ago we used OS Max 30S engines on these planes and they were unlikely to have as much power as a current OS LA 25
In 1969 the Falcon 56 was probably the most popular model plane in central Ohio
In 1969 the Falcon 56 was probably the most popular model plane in central Ohio
#5

My Feedback: (1)
Generally speaking, the 46 size engines are plenty for that size aircraft. Now, some have more power than others. For instance, the OS LA series have less than their AX series (much less) but are completely adequate for that plane. I had a rather heavy kit while I was working in England, that consisted of EPP like foam, and was assembled with packing tape and duct tape. As I said, it was pretty heavy. I had an Evolution 46 engine on that plane. It was pretty amazing. Had lots of power plus it was fairly easy to fly as a trainer. But because it was fairly heavy, it was somewhat of a handful at landing, but we managed.
The point here is that even as heavy as that plane was, it flew fine with that engine.
I also built a Debonnaire S.P.A.D. a while back and it had an OS 46 FX I believe, (the series I mean, it was an OS 46 but not an AX). It too was heavy, but that engine handled it just fine.
The Hobbico NexSTAR RTF comes wth an OS 46 FXi and that was plenty of power for that larger trainer aircraft (larger than a Hobbico Super Star, for instance, which came with an OS 46 LA).
CGr.
The point here is that even as heavy as that plane was, it flew fine with that engine.
I also built a Debonnaire S.P.A.D. a while back and it had an OS 46 FX I believe, (the series I mean, it was an OS 46 but not an AX). It too was heavy, but that engine handled it just fine.
The Hobbico NexSTAR RTF comes wth an OS 46 FXi and that was plenty of power for that larger trainer aircraft (larger than a Hobbico Super Star, for instance, which came with an OS 46 LA).
CGr.
#6
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Centennial,
CO
THANKS CGr,
I think I'll go with the Ev 46. I was worried about weight & too much power for a trainer. Hopefully I won't be in training mode forever.
Boxsterguy
I think I'll go with the Ev 46. I was worried about weight & too much power for a trainer. Hopefully I won't be in training mode forever.
Boxsterguy
#8

I have an "OLD" FP.35 in my Falcon MKII and that is enough power to fly around with mild aerobatics, loops rolls and general moves. It is no where near a pwoer house. Now a .46 would yank this plane around just fine.
Dru.
Dru.
#9
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Centennial,
CO
My problem now is that I can only fit a 6 OZ. tank in the Falcon. I'm wondering how long my flight time will be with the EVO 46 in it?
#11
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Centennial,
CO
That doesn't sound like a lot of time, but I'm sure I won't be at full throttle all that much. I'm still looking for an 8 oz. tank that will fit. It's a set screw on the front steering gear that is stopping the tank from going all the way down. I'v read where you can heat gun the tank into a new shape. I might try that.
Thanks again
Bguy
Thanks again
Bguy
#13

ORIGINAL: boxsterguy
That doesn't sound like a lot of time, but I'm sure I won't be at full throttle all that much. I'm still looking for an 8 oz. tank that will fit. It's a set screw on the front steering gear that is stopping the tank from going all the way down. I'v read where you can heat gun the tank into a new shape. I might try that.
Thanks again
Bguy
That doesn't sound like a lot of time, but I'm sure I won't be at full throttle all that much. I'm still looking for an 8 oz. tank that will fit. It's a set screw on the front steering gear that is stopping the tank from going all the way down. I'v read where you can heat gun the tank into a new shape. I might try that.
Thanks again
Bguy
#14
Welcome to the Falcon 56 club, boxsterguy!!!
Here you can find videos of a Falcon with a 0.46 engine:
http://www.masportaviator.com/ah.asp?CatID=1&ID=191
I have one, built from an old kit, with ailerons, powered by a 0.40 Magnum and fed by a 6 ounces tank.
It flies for more than 10 minutes if not kept at full power all the time.
I believe this model was meant for 0.35 engines.
I like the performance of the 0.40, although it fits tight and the tail needed some weight to counter-balance it.
Please post any solution to make a 8 ounces tank fit in the compartment, still keeping some room for foam padding.
It is an awesome model; enjoy it!
Best of lucks!!
Here you can find videos of a Falcon with a 0.46 engine:
http://www.masportaviator.com/ah.asp?CatID=1&ID=191
I have one, built from an old kit, with ailerons, powered by a 0.40 Magnum and fed by a 6 ounces tank.
It flies for more than 10 minutes if not kept at full power all the time.
I believe this model was meant for 0.35 engines.
I like the performance of the 0.40, although it fits tight and the tail needed some weight to counter-balance it.
Please post any solution to make a 8 ounces tank fit in the compartment, still keeping some room for foam padding.
It is an awesome model; enjoy it!
Best of lucks!!
#15
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Centennial,
CO
Thanks for the imput. The 8 oz. Sullivan tank may work now if I reshape it with my heat gun which is arriving today. The only problem is that its width is exactly that of the fusilage so there is no room on the sides for foam. Is this going to be a problem with vibration/foaming of fuel?
Bguy
Bguy




