Second Plane
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South Canaan,
PA
Hey guys,
I had already posted a thread about the GP Ultra sport as a second plane. But I am still having a hard time deciding. That is why I set up this poll.
I had already posted a thread about the GP Ultra sport as a second plane. But I am still having a hard time deciding. That is why I set up this poll.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South Canaan,
PA
I flew the Tiger Trainer for about a year and am now doing aerobatics on it. My Senorita was completed in April but recently met a tree which is no longer among the world of the living. But the Senorita is back flying again (I got twelve succesful flights on it on Thursday!)
#9
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orange, TX
13yroldpilot,
I have to go with DBCherry the great planes super sportster is a great second plane. I am flying a sportster with a k&b 40 and a 11/5 prop. It will slow down and float in. Do you want an arf or are you going to build? If I had to choose from your poll it would be the tiger.
I have to go with DBCherry the great planes super sportster is a great second plane. I am flying a sportster with a k&b 40 and a 11/5 prop. It will slow down and float in. Do you want an arf or are you going to build? If I had to choose from your poll it would be the tiger.
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Heyworth, IL,
Hi 13yroldpilot.
I built the Somethin' Extra as my second plane and the Super Sportster as my third. If you want a plane that will do some fun 3D stuff, you might want to go with the Somethin' Extra.(but start out with low rates) If you want a plane for more "pattern type" flying, the Sportster will work great. I like them both for these two reasons. I think the Sportster is a nicer looking plane, but the SE is more fun to "fling around". As kits, I found the SE a little easier to build than the Sportster, mainly due to the need to shape the nose for the Sportster. (not a big deal tho) For power, I installed OS 46FX's in each plane, but this year I've installed Webra 50s to give them a little more "oomph"...
I think either of these would make nice second planes...Len
I built the Somethin' Extra as my second plane and the Super Sportster as my third. If you want a plane that will do some fun 3D stuff, you might want to go with the Somethin' Extra.(but start out with low rates) If you want a plane for more "pattern type" flying, the Sportster will work great. I like them both for these two reasons. I think the Sportster is a nicer looking plane, but the SE is more fun to "fling around". As kits, I found the SE a little easier to build than the Sportster, mainly due to the need to shape the nose for the Sportster. (not a big deal tho) For power, I installed OS 46FX's in each plane, but this year I've installed Webra 50s to give them a little more "oomph"...
I think either of these would make nice second planes...Len
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Boisbriand,
QC, CANADA
Hello, the better plane is not in your list!
I would recommand you without any doubt the GP Super sporter 40 with a 46FX on the nose.
1) very good low wing trainer
2) You have to learn to take off with a tail wheel
3) That plane can do easily the basic IMAC and pattern sequence.
4) I won the 1 st position in my local IMAC competition with the GPSS, in the basic sequence. All other pilots had big birds like Extra, Cap etc...
5) move the CG 1/2 inch behind recommanded on the plan and you can do some 3D stuff.
6) Something Extra is'nt a second step trainer but a 3D plane.
Scoubidou
I would recommand you without any doubt the GP Super sporter 40 with a 46FX on the nose.
1) very good low wing trainer
2) You have to learn to take off with a tail wheel
3) That plane can do easily the basic IMAC and pattern sequence.
4) I won the 1 st position in my local IMAC competition with the GPSS, in the basic sequence. All other pilots had big birds like Extra, Cap etc...
5) move the CG 1/2 inch behind recommanded on the plan and you can do some 3D stuff.
6) Something Extra is'nt a second step trainer but a 3D plane.
Scoubidou
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Somewhere in,
TX
I built a SPAD(brick), it was fast, easy, and cheap. When my tower 46 engine died, it flew like a brick. After that I built a combat, then recovered a old scat cat 500. I would rcomend, if you have the time, to build a kit. The four star would work good. I am not sure how much building experice that you have. Think about that first.
#19
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Phoenix,
AZ
I would have to say the BTE Venture60. You can't do any better for kit quality or flying quality. It is my second plane (much like the 4* series) and my favorite.
By the way, I didn't know this plane existed until I found this web site.
By the way, I didn't know this plane existed until I found this web site.
#24
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South Canaan,
PA
Rick,
I was looking more at the Somethin' Extra but demorcracy is golden. Thanks the 4*60 looks ike a good one. Anybody else who has a 4*? What are your thoughts?
-Dan
I was looking more at the Somethin' Extra but demorcracy is golden. Thanks the 4*60 looks ike a good one. Anybody else who has a 4*? What are your thoughts?
-Dan




