Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Hanger 9 p51 pts >

Hanger 9 p51 pts

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Hanger 9 p51 pts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2010 | 09:11 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: new castle, PA
Default Hanger 9 p51 pts

I am a Newbie at all this stuff but have 1 simple question, i would like to buy the p 51 pts by Hanger 9 would this be a plane i should buy or will it be too hard to fly for a beginner, please give me your input.
Old 01-29-2010 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: KS
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

your going to basicaly get two opinions on this plane, one is that it is not a good trainer, and the other is that it is a good trainer. I learned with this plane with no problems, however DO NOT try and teach yourself with this plane, best advice I can give you is to find an instructor and get their opinion, if the instructor subscribes to opinion 1, you'll have problems, it's just some people don't believe you can learn with this plane
Old 01-29-2010 | 09:39 PM
  #3  
DeferredDefect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , ON, CANADA
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

I have seen a few of these aircraft fly at the local club, and the general consensus is that it is not as great as a "proper" trainer. It lacks any self righting ability, and is also a taildragger - landings and takeoffs will be more difficult.

If you are planning on learning by yourself, forget the Mustang. When (not if) you crash, you could do major damage. Get a smaller glow trainer, such as a Carl Goldberg Eaglet, or Sig Kadet Mk2.

For learning to fly a glow trainer, you really should join a club - at least so someone can look over your aeroplane and test fly it.
From my personal experience, I think the Sig Kadet Senior is the best trainer. It looks great - rounded forward fuselage, real windows, and a fibreglass cowl. It is also a good size (80 inch wingspan) so it is easier to fly. (trust me - smaller models are harder!)

Have fun and enjoy the hobby!

Graeme
Old 01-29-2010 | 10:03 PM
  #4  
IFR Pilot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: berlin, NL, BHUTAN
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

The P-51 PTS is more of a 3rd plane than it is a trainer. However, there are low-wing airplanes with high wing areas that make great trainers. You certainly can't go wrong with a high-wing.

GraemeEllis hit it good with ( Smaller doesn't always mean Easier ).
Old 01-29-2010 | 10:06 PM
  #5  
OzMo's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: OZark, MO
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

Yep you will get two schools of thought on this one.
If you strip ALL of the extra stuff off they are OK flyers. Not self righting as previously mentioned. And complicated to repair. AS MENTIONED BEFORE you will crash. Thats why trash bags are standard equipment
Look up at the top of this forum for trainer recomendations. Almost any cheap basic 40 size trainer will do well. Smaller can be a little hard to see at times. (you may be able to see it fine but the instructor needs to be able to see it too. My favorite is the Sig LT 40 with an os .46 engine. If you show up with the Sig LT 40 as oppossed to the p51 you'll get more smiles from the instructors, seriously. I would NOT buy any radio gear until I knew what is compatible to the instructor's. GOOD LUCK
Old 01-29-2010 | 11:00 PM
  #6  
DeferredDefect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , ON, CANADA
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

If you would like a more appropriate low wing trainer (2nd plane), try the Carl Goldberg Tiger 60 on low rates.  It is very gentle and lands like a trainer.

Thank you

Graeme
Old 01-31-2010 | 02:37 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: new castle, PA
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

Thanks for the input guys.
Old 01-31-2010 | 06:51 AM
  #8  
my05monte's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 133
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

I started out with the original p-51 pts. Personally I wish I had started out with something easier. I now fly the sig lt-40 while the mustang hangs from my ceiling. Definitely get an instructor with this plane and I learned a lot from him. I replaced the mustang 2 times before I finally put it in storage.
Old 01-31-2010 | 10:06 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

I have taught with this airplane....it is not a good trainer......it would make a good second airplane....but as a trainer there are better airplanes out there...
Old 04-27-2010 | 07:35 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sao Paulo, BRAZIL
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

It´s my first rc airplane and love it. Removed all training stuffs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WL-LBbHEVY

thx
Old 04-27-2010 | 09:21 PM
  #11  
My Feedback: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,400
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Hemderson, NV
Default RE: Hanger 9 p51 pts

Nice little plane after you remove all the PTS crap but as a trainer?? Well, there are a lot better options out there. As a trainer I thought it was junk and would stick with a normal, cheap high wing.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.