Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 When is it okay to go bigger? >

When is it okay to go bigger?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

When is it okay to go bigger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2010 | 11:02 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

I have to disagree with the most recent post about being more of a pain to fly the bigger ones. I, within the last year, came into a good deal on an 1/4 scale aerobatic bird. I have flown only .40 - .60 sized glow planes in the past 20 years or so. If I'm pressed for time I take the bigger airplane. Either way I have to bolt the wings on, fuel, and fly. The big difference is when it's time to break down. I really enjoy not having to cary the cleaning equipment and taking the time to clean the mess off of the glow planes. The fuel is obviously much less expensive too.

Like I was saying that I got into it because I found a good deal and there are good deal to be had so it doesn't need to be that expensive to get into. I got a 1/4 scale sukhoi 31 RX ready for $500 bucks. You can easily spend that much on a glow plane.

The flying is different. Most are saying that flying the larger planes are easier to fly and this is mostly true. The only thing about it is that a small error causes alot more damage and cost alot more money to repair. For instance I see alot of the new to gas guys breaking alot of props. The props wind up costing at least 20 bucks a peice. I actually find the bigger planes a little (not much) harder to land untill you get used to it.

Whether you are actually ready for it, only you know that. I agree with the saying " only fly what you can afford two of." At the end of the day if you don't wreck the plane I think you will enjoy flying the bigger planes better.
Old 05-31-2010 | 11:24 PM
  #27  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,393
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sinclair, WY
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

Yes you have made some very good points on the gas verses glow, I was once thinking bigger to go gas! But the gas engines are now getting smaller and looks like we will get them for the sixty size and even the forty size! Both sizes are offered now in gas, I think what it will amount to is we just all have to fly what we can afford or have room for. The smaller gas engines excite me allot, Because you are right glow fuel is getting out of hand on price and even a big spark plug is cheaper then that lttle tiny glow plug! So I am very much with you on the gas verses glow, you win that point hands down!
Old 06-01-2010 | 12:42 AM
  #28  
Eganwp's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

My advise is to skip all the 25-28% BS and go straight to 30% or larger. The wing loadings are MUCH better at this size. I went straight from 1 year of flying 40 size planes to 30% DLE-55 gasser. I LOVE IT! The power and lack of mess and crap you need to bring to the field will make you smile.
Old 06-01-2010 | 06:46 AM
  #29  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

ORIGINAL: albsurfer

ORIGINAL: victorzamora

My biggest plane was the Aeroworks 60/90 Extra 260 until Christmas this past year when I got my 88'' Extreme Flight Edge. It's more nerve-racking to fly, and I've been into 3D and IMAC for a while.

If you're just wanting to do sport flying, the big planes really won't fly that much better. There's nothing impressive that a 150cc plane will do in the world of sport flying compared to a 40-sized Ultra Stick. The only difference is size and awe. I mean, I just think that if you're only doing sport flying....then ego is the only reason to get a big plane.

Also, stay away from Aeroworks. They're pretty and easy to build, but they're heavy and fly relatively poorly. None of their planes make weight, and they're all snappy (confirmed up to 50cc).
victorzamora, I disagree about Aeroworks weights. They are pretty light-weight in the 1.20 and lower categories. The problem is that the airframes will come apart if crashed or wingtips hit the ground during flight easier. Take a look at comparable wingspans, lengths, and weights of GP, Phoenix Models, and Seagull Models planes. I have the GP Extra 300 SP which has a 55'' wingspan. The aeroworks .46-.61 Edge is 5.5 lbs with a 60'' wingspan and will fly great aerobatics with a .46 TT Pro, .46AX, ST .45, and more. It will 3D with a .55AX or a .61 of almost any MFR. BUT... if you crash, there is usually more damage to the Aeroworks frame & wings because of airframe and wing lightening of weight.

Also, Heavy Metal Thunder & PMD have very good points. Research what they have said in this forum.
Aeroworks planes are lightweight? You've clearly NEVER flown one. Not only are they as heavy as a simonized brick, they fly like one too. For example, my favorite 60 size plane has 713 squares and comes to 5.5lbs with Saito 100, a 5-cell nickel pack, and all stock equipment. My AW Extra 260 60/90 was over 7lbs with no pants AND a lipo instead of nickel and had 690 squares (check the threads, they're NOT coming out at advertised weight). Not looking hard, either. The 120 I've found (after literally 10 seconds of search) has over 1000 squares and weighs 9lbs. The Aeroworks plane has 960 squares and weighs "9 to 10" but never makes weight budget. In fact, if there is one good thing to say about the Aeroworks planes is that they're so overbuilt that they can withstand a VERY thorough beating. Aeroworks planes are gorgeous, but they have lots of bad habits. The only Aeroworks planes I would even THINK about spending my money on are the Mustang, the Cub, and the 195...but I will NEVER buy or fly another Aeroworks aerobatic aircraft.
Old 06-01-2010 | 06:53 AM
  #30  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

And Paully, the main thing about flying a bigger plane is to not let them psyche you out. If you're afraid of it, you'll do something stupid. But if your approaches and landings are good with your Pulse XT40 (the best 40 plane I've ever flown, I love it!). Big planes just take up more sky and make your knees knock because your wallet is afraid of crashing. Get a good set-up, build it well, have an experienced guy help you with the motor AND look it over, and do frequent preventative maintenance. Do those simple steps and you'll be just dandy. Just...dont' be afraid of the big ones. Remember, they're still just R/C planes....the same sticks control the same things, this one is just bigger.

Do you have any plans for a set-up? A good set-up is your first step towards success

Edit: I totally agree with Eganwp, there's no reason to go 25-28%. They're about the same price and don't fly nearly as well.
Old 06-01-2010 | 07:03 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Plainfield, IL
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

I'd love recommendations on a plane/setup. I was set on that Aeroworks, but it sounds like that might not be a good idea.

I plan to ask around to see if there are any used ones for sale at my club, but if not...What should I get?
Old 06-01-2010 | 07:26 AM
  #32  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

It all depends on what you want to do with it, and what kind of plane you want. I had a bad experience with Dietrich/TopDawg. Aeroworks is heavy (read other threads, you'll see it's more than just me saying it) but if you don't feel like you'll EVER want to give a hard elevator input of any kind (like recovering from an ugly snap) then they'll be just fine (but still not worth the cost, to me). Extreme Flight is really nice, but they're a little costly. 3DHobby Shop really is nice, but they're a little costly. Peakmodels is cheaper and I've heard good things, hardware isn't the best...but it's mostly usable. Pilot-RC are good planes that are an up-and-coming company...I've heard good things. I can't think of other planes, but that should give you a good start of what to look at....but if you're just doing sport flying, pick the plane that you like the look of. I prefer Edges because of their 3D capabilities, but Extras fly smoother but don't 3D as well. Yaks fly a little smoother than Edges, and 3D better than Extras...kind of a 'tweener plane.

On set-up, go for what you can afford. I'd get one of 3 motors: MT70, DA60, DLE55 (in no particular order). Servos, I'd get an 8611/7955 for the rudder and then 8411's or PowerHD servos on ail and ele. Of course, metal arms (I like MPI) all around. Any standard servo will work on throttle. You can get a choke servo OR run a manual choke arm. I like the manual choke arm, less issues. In fact, my choke servo gave me FITS and would simply refuse to work. Caused a premature plug fouling and caused me to lose my engine mid-flight. Battery: depends on your charger. I like A123 and you can get an A123 compatible charger from Hobbyking for $30. Your ignition battery should be either 800mAh nimh pack or a lipo/reg. I have a lipo/reg just because I had it around the house (and you get more capacity per weight). You could also get an IBEF or Zeus instead. You'll need a kill switch for sure. Switches: you'll need a nice switch on your Rx. MPI has fail-on switches with built-in charge jacks. Fromeco Badgers/Wolverines are pretty fail-on switches with built-in charge jacks (I have a badger). The EMS switches on Tower are nice, too. Forget about a power expander, there's no need. Two receiver batteries might be worth it to you since you're doing sport flying, but I've got 1. You don't need 2 receivers...there's just no point. There are lots of pretty fuel dots out there. I like a 3-line setup with the fill line copper either curling under itself onto the bottom/front of the tank or just barely peaking through the stopper (that way you put the plane on its nose and can get all the fuel out. Remember to use lots of Loctite and loop your vent line over your tank and then run it out the bottom. Besides that, it's just a big ARF.
Old 06-01-2010 | 08:42 AM
  #33  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,821
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
From: Waterford, Mi/Citrus Springs, Fl
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

If you just want to fly a bigger sport plane, not looking for hard core 3D, I'm not sure of the logic in back of going with some of these (50cc +) suggestions? They're expensive, and from what I've seen, they can be a little over the top for somebody just looking for sport performance. I would suggest you look at the 4*, the Giant Sportster, or something similar in the 26 to 35cc, 1000-1100+ sq. in. range. This size is about half the price of a 50cc. Then set it up nice and simple like you would a .60 size - just make sure to use metal gear servos. Maybe get something that size under your belt? Some of the rear carb config engines in this class will not leave you disappointed regarding performance..... Unlimited vertical pretty easily achieved with them.
Old 06-01-2010 | 10:51 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

I agree, the Giant Sportster is a great flying plane.
Old 06-01-2010 | 10:55 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cusseta, AL
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

I made the swap when i got a busted up old sweet-n-low (WS 86ish) and i rebuilt it. sounds like you fly about like I do. JUst your basic maneuvers and rolls, split S's and stuff. I love the big planes. I think they fly better. The smaller ones seem really squirrelly to me now. I've always wanted big planes just because. I haven't changed my style or anything, so the transition wasn't a big deal. The one thing I did notice was I was a lot more nervous. I still get nervous from time to time. I guess what I'm trying to say is the swap over is when it becomes available or you just decide to do it. That's my .02 worth. I don't know that I helped any with that rambling
Old 06-01-2010 | 04:36 PM
  #36  
Lifer's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,564
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

"If it ever crashes, there will be a 6' deep crater and the plane will be laying intact in the bottom of it!"

Best laugh I've had in weeks! Thank you!

My first "big" plane was the WM GS Zero. The poor beast had to live through my transition from "gliding" in for a landing with a 5 pound plane to "powering" into the landing with a 15 pound plane.

It had a rough childhood......


Old 06-01-2010 | 08:04 PM
  #37  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Rye Brook, NY
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?

Sounds like you're ready...I say Go For It! They offer a special kind of fun in their own way IMO.

One item that has to comply...is your method of transportation!

No longer can you arrive at the field in your compact, with various wingtips and chunks of foam poking out the windows!
Old 06-02-2010 | 04:41 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Default RE: When is it okay to go bigger?



When I go for a big plane it will be 100% scale and I can sit inside it. </p>

But for RC controlled planes I like anything smaller than 1.8 or 28cc which translates into &lt;2m wingspan and &lt;2m total lenght.</p>

Any bigger and I run into storage space problems, increasing the "hanger rash" which I would prefer to avoid on large scale models.

the cost is another unattractive aspect.

But my opinion on "When is it ok to go bigger?" is whenever you are comfortable with flying confidently everytime. There is no time to think about the cost of the bird.

I have decided to progress from 10e Electric through to .40 to 0.60, to 1.20 size glow before moving up to 28cc, &gt;70" wingspan.

No particular reason other than cost and comfort.
Smaller planes are cheaper to replace, easier to transport and easier to repair. Large aircraft or more sensitive to proper repair work meaning after a crash you have to rebuild correctly sice they are built much closer to the lowest factor of safety (1) in the interest of performance.

In myhanger I would like to see

1 x Pilot Rc Extra 260 26%
1x Aero Model Giles 202 1.2
and many 04. to 0.6 size sport and scale flyers since these I'll spend most time with. Cheaper, quicker and easier to get into the air and they're just plain unadulterated fun!

</p>

</p>

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.