looking for a phoenix 8
#27

My Feedback: (3)
Alright,
here is the video of the GP Revolver at 160 mph - level flight. I was under the impression he had approached 200 with a 10s setup.
The thing is, the revolver is a "speed" design with a 59" span, thin airfoil and a high wing loading of up to 29 oz/sq ft. Specs call for a 55 size engine. People have put 91's in it and say they can't quite match the 10s electric setup.
I've been wondering actually whether 6s will do it (if it can be done). It seems to me that a very high kV motor (DF type) with a low drag prop on it (maybe 10" max diameter) and something more akin to 8s might be needed but I'm just speculating. Someone like Andy who is knowledgeable with electric setups might be able to better configure the e-power train but high cell count and low capacity (just to set the record) seems paramount. That wing (and stab) is also going to be crucial. The P7 should have less form drag than the Revolver.
This would be info to just start getting one's hands wet with the speed record attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitic_drag
That finish is going to be paramount too.
David.
here is the video of the GP Revolver at 160 mph - level flight. I was under the impression he had approached 200 with a 10s setup.
The thing is, the revolver is a "speed" design with a 59" span, thin airfoil and a high wing loading of up to 29 oz/sq ft. Specs call for a 55 size engine. People have put 91's in it and say they can't quite match the 10s electric setup.
I've been wondering actually whether 6s will do it (if it can be done). It seems to me that a very high kV motor (DF type) with a low drag prop on it (maybe 10" max diameter) and something more akin to 8s might be needed but I'm just speculating. Someone like Andy who is knowledgeable with electric setups might be able to better configure the e-power train but high cell count and low capacity (just to set the record) seems paramount. That wing (and stab) is also going to be crucial. The P7 should have less form drag than the Revolver.
This would be info to just start getting one's hands wet with the speed record attempt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitic_drag
That finish is going to be paramount too.
David.
#28

My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: crankpin
Here is a real motor. Going to set a speed record, get the AMA involved, make it official.
V
Here is a real motor. Going to set a speed record, get the AMA involved, make it official.
V
David.
P.S. Finally found me a NIB OS 40 VF after a long search
Love those engines!
#32

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manahawkin,
NJ
Here are some pictures of my Phoenix 8. I built this plane back in the 80's ,glassed and painted. It has s YS 60/Mac tuned pipe, spring air retracts. I have upgraded the servo's and a 2.4 JR Rx. It still flys occasionally and is very fast.
Steve
Steve
#33

My Feedback: (121)
I'm not going to dispute anybody's speed claims. I just wanted to point out that the current FAI F3A (R/C) combustion engine speed record is 343.92 KM/hour or 213.702MPH. The current record for R/C electric motor propulsion is 361.00KM/hour or 224.315MPH. Breaking or even attaining 200mph is a bit more difficult than it may seem. Of course, the original motivation for this thread was just to get a 'honkin' P-8 in the air and that is definitely achievable.
One final consideration: the accuracy of radar detectors. To set an FAI approved record the speed must be timed over a specific distance in both directions (then averaged, I believe). Back in the 70's (when I was a lot younger, more energetic and very curious) I had the father of a friend (who was a police officer) provide some radar numbers on the airplane I was flying at the time; a Joy Products Mars (now called the Excalibur by Balsa USA). With the help of some friends, I then measured off 1/4 mile (1/8 mile on either side of me) and we performed some timed speed tests (this was actually a really fun physics project - fly and get credit for it
). Once we got the hang of the timing part of the distance test we got pretty consistent results - 10-15% slower than the radar readings. Of course this was about 35 years ago and I assume... that radar detectors have improved.
Good Luck and go fassssssst!
One final consideration: the accuracy of radar detectors. To set an FAI approved record the speed must be timed over a specific distance in both directions (then averaged, I believe). Back in the 70's (when I was a lot younger, more energetic and very curious) I had the father of a friend (who was a police officer) provide some radar numbers on the airplane I was flying at the time; a Joy Products Mars (now called the Excalibur by Balsa USA). With the help of some friends, I then measured off 1/4 mile (1/8 mile on either side of me) and we performed some timed speed tests (this was actually a really fun physics project - fly and get credit for it
). Once we got the hang of the timing part of the distance test we got pretty consistent results - 10-15% slower than the radar readings. Of course this was about 35 years ago and I assume... that radar detectors have improved.Good Luck and go fassssssst!
#35
ORIGINAL: MetallicaJunkie
where do you get those tires?
where do you get those tires?
Different size's available.
http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/s...idProduct=4119
#36
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ORIGINAL: flywilly
we got pretty consistent results - 10-15% slower than the radar readings.
we got pretty consistent results - 10-15% slower than the radar readings.

#37
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pullman, WA
ORIGINAL: doxilia
So true Crank but I think e-power might be the way to achieve this if possible. The outer shell of the fuse has got to be bullet like.
David.
P.S. Finally found me a NIB OS 40 VF after a long search
Love those engines!
ORIGINAL: crankpin
Here is a real motor. Going to set a speed record, get the AMA involved, make it official.
V
Here is a real motor. Going to set a speed record, get the AMA involved, make it official.
V
David.
P.S. Finally found me a NIB OS 40 VF after a long search
Love those engines!
really? a 40 VF, I have one as well,, wish I would have known, its going up for sale as well,, soon ,,
#38
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pullman, WA
If tyou are really serious, you may want to reference the current crop of Quarter 40 pylon racers, they are purpose built and are almost 200 mph airplanes, they are a LOT smaller than a pattern bird, with a LOT thinner airfoil. May give you some perspective on what is needed.
#39
ORIGINAL: alcarafa
You may like this ones , alloy hub and not expensive really good ones.
Different size's available.
http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/s...idProduct=4119
ORIGINAL: MetallicaJunkie
where do you get those tires?
where do you get those tires?
Different size's available.
http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/s...idProduct=4119
those are nice!!!
#40
ORIGINAL: Taurus Flyer
MetallicaJunkie,
You write: where do you get those tires?
We could buy these tires (wheels) in the Netherlands but that could be a VERY long time ago.
Dimensions are 73 mm 2 13/16 on it (see picture) but there is no brandname.
Reason I did show the picture was, he did write:
the one i flew not that many years ago would do 170mph with a 60 heli engine. 200 isnt that much faster
''Would''? Does that mean he didn’t measure it.
I often measure and log the real airspeed and for that I know my highest speed ever was 245 km/h (152 mph) in a vertical down line, horizontal speed 195 km/h (122 mph), pumped Webra Speed 10 ccm with Sonex pipe and own design pattern airplane. That's why I think 200 mph you will not reach with that plane, but I am curious.
Cees
MetallicaJunkie,
You write: where do you get those tires?
We could buy these tires (wheels) in the Netherlands but that could be a VERY long time ago.
Dimensions are 73 mm 2 13/16 on it (see picture) but there is no brandname.
Reason I did show the picture was, he did write:
the one i flew not that many years ago would do 170mph with a 60 heli engine. 200 isnt that much faster
''Would''? Does that mean he didn’t measure it.
I often measure and log the real airspeed and for that I know my highest speed ever was 245 km/h (152 mph) in a vertical down line, horizontal speed 195 km/h (122 mph), pumped Webra Speed 10 ccm with Sonex pipe and own design pattern airplane. That's why I think 200 mph you will not reach with that plane, but I am curious.
Cees
this thread is making want to build my Tipo.....
#41

My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: zedad71
David,
really? a 40 VF, I have one as well,, wish I would have known, its going up for sale as well,, soon ,,
ORIGINAL: doxilia
So true Crank but I think e-power might be the way to achieve this if possible. The outer shell of the fuse has got to be bullet like.
David.
P.S. Finally found me a NIB OS 40 VF after a long search
Love those engines!
ORIGINAL: crankpin
Here is a real motor. Going to set a speed record, get the AMA involved, make it official.
V
Here is a real motor. Going to set a speed record, get the AMA involved, make it official.
V
David.
P.S. Finally found me a NIB OS 40 VF after a long search
Love those engines!
really? a 40 VF, I have one as well,, wish I would have known, its going up for sale as well,, soon ,,
had I only known, they are good for pattern too!
David.
#42
Thread Starter

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Yankton,
SD
my Phoenix 8 will be on the way here next week. after looking at the Phoenix 7 i mite buy a hanger 9 and take off the monocote **** and replace with carbon fliber tissue http://www.cstsales.com/carbon_tissue.html
#43
Thread Starter

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Yankton,
SD
this battery http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=14616
this motor http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=11143
CC 180 amp ESC 10X10 prop
this is what i plan to drop in my p-8
this motor http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=11143
CC 180 amp ESC 10X10 prop
this is what i plan to drop in my p-8
#44
ORIGINAL: Wagner24314
this battery http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=14616
this motor http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=11143
CC 180 amp ESC 10X10 prop
this is what i plan to drop in my p-8
this battery http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=14616
this motor http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store...dProduct=11143
CC 180 amp ESC 10X10 prop
this is what i plan to drop in my p-8
[
]
#46

My Feedback: (1)
200 mph will not happen with this design. Radar guns are notoriusly unreliable. Odd to take an aerobatic design with a thick wing and try to force very high speed out of it. The record setting designs will have no more than a 9-10% section. Speed is more about reducing drag than increasing power. Maybe build the wing with a moder pylon section Selig 6060 or something. Then you will have a fighting chance.
#47
Hi,
That carbon fliber tissue I had never heard of before. How good is it compared to "Japanese tissue paper", silk, skyloftand other conventional covering material (I have used)?
/Bo
That carbon fliber tissue I had never heard of before. How good is it compared to "Japanese tissue paper", silk, skyloftand other conventional covering material (I have used)?
/Bo


