Name that plane V
#11

My Feedback: (8)
Woops,
The last word in your sentence adequately describes the muffler. JUNK !! Not that I didn't like Semco mufflers, but the last thing they did was muffle anything. Honestly, I believe they were made just to appease those "muffler" rules at the field. I had one of their other models on a Skybolt, again just to say it had a muffler, and it actually increased engine performance. They are well made, and look cool, but don't really muffle a lot. Put it on an engine and find out for yourself. They made the muffler and then the fun part was finding the appropriate "adapter" to make it fit your engine. I think I've still got one somewhere... have to dig it out.
Dan
The last word in your sentence adequately describes the muffler. JUNK !! Not that I didn't like Semco mufflers, but the last thing they did was muffle anything. Honestly, I believe they were made just to appease those "muffler" rules at the field. I had one of their other models on a Skybolt, again just to say it had a muffler, and it actually increased engine performance. They are well made, and look cool, but don't really muffle a lot. Put it on an engine and find out for yourself. They made the muffler and then the fun part was finding the appropriate "adapter" to make it fit your engine. I think I've still got one somewhere... have to dig it out.
Dan
#12

My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: California
I'm flying my Tower .61 with the tuned muffler, but I'll have to take this one along to find out.
Flying them back to back shouldn't be a problem.(as far as changing mufflers, I don't know about the noise)
Woops
Flying them back to back shouldn't be a problem.(as far as changing mufflers, I don't know about the noise)Woops




