Deception or Tiporare?
#1
Thread Starter

I am getting some cores cut in the next few weeks and I am thinking of getting a set of cores cut for one of the above planes. I have plans for both, so which one should I get cores for? I am leaning towards the Tipo, but I think both are great models. Power will be a ST90 side exhaust engine if that influences anyone's thoughts.
Mark
Mark
#4

Both aircraft are fine flying aircraft. I personally have not flown a Tipo, but, I have scratched and successfully flown the Deception. Jim Kimbro designed and built a nice flying plane. At the time I used a Webra Speed Rear Exhaust 61 with a OPS tuned pipe, with mixture control. The plane was very solid in all the manuvers. and yes it landed "hot" as it was a "slick" aircraft. I still have a set of plans,canopy(UFO style) and the Webra "pickled" for a future Deception. Hummmm !
Either way you will do well.
Either way you will do well.
#5

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tallahassee,
FL
Mark,
I competed in the 80's with two Deceptions and a Tipo, in that order. Both designs are excellent. My Tipo was somewhat lighter than the Deceptions since I Monokoted the wings and stab as compared to the balsa/foam Deceptions which were glassed and painted. Also, as time went on, I moved to progressively more powerful engines - the Tipo had a Rossi and then a YS60 while the Deceptions had a Super Tiger X-60 and then Webra Speeds. The difference in weight and power makes a detailed comparison impossible, but I loved them all. I am currently building a Deception from plans and I will be taking pains to build it lighter (and straighter) than my previous efforts. I am also contemplating a Tipo for my next plane. Where did you get the plans?
Jeff
Skylane N9214G
SPA 243
I competed in the 80's with two Deceptions and a Tipo, in that order. Both designs are excellent. My Tipo was somewhat lighter than the Deceptions since I Monokoted the wings and stab as compared to the balsa/foam Deceptions which were glassed and painted. Also, as time went on, I moved to progressively more powerful engines - the Tipo had a Rossi and then a YS60 while the Deceptions had a Super Tiger X-60 and then Webra Speeds. The difference in weight and power makes a detailed comparison impossible, but I loved them all. I am currently building a Deception from plans and I will be taking pains to build it lighter (and straighter) than my previous efforts. I am also contemplating a Tipo for my next plane. Where did you get the plans?
Jeff
Skylane N9214G
SPA 243
#6
Thread Starter

ORIGINAL: rainedave
Wasn't there a scaled-up Tipo (the Hippo?) that would be a good choice for your .90?
David
Wasn't there a scaled-up Tipo (the Hippo?) that would be a good choice for your .90?
David
Skylane, I bought the Deception plans from MAN and someone sent me a scan of the Tipo plans (I can't recall who, it was a couple of years ago).
Mark
#7

My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Champaign, IL
I had 5 Tipos when it was in its prime. It was an excellent airplane Never had a Deception, but it comes down to personal preference ay this point.
There was also a Hippo Tipo. I think it was around 1981 time frame. I think Don Weitz flew one that year. It was also a Dick Hansen creation.
There was also a Hippo Tipo. I think it was around 1981 time frame. I think Don Weitz flew one that year. It was also a Dick Hansen creation.
#8
Having had a Tipo 750, and being very succsessful with it, I vote Tipo. Never flew a Deception, but it is highly regarded. Photo of my Tipo below - yes, it has the old Taurus paint scheme, it is very visible in all air conditions.
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
I'm with you. I prefer the Tiporare (standard size).
I built/flew/trimmed and eventually abandoned a Deception. In a dog fighting world of Japanese Zeros, ME-109 and Spitfires, the Deception was the equivalent of the P-47 Jug. Great for ground attacks and other strafing duties, but too heavy and awkward for intimate dog fights with lighter, tighter turning airplanes. Just my opinion.
Ed Cregger
I built/flew/trimmed and eventually abandoned a Deception. In a dog fighting world of Japanese Zeros, ME-109 and Spitfires, the Deception was the equivalent of the P-47 Jug. Great for ground attacks and other strafing duties, but too heavy and awkward for intimate dog fights with lighter, tighter turning airplanes. Just my opinion.
Ed Cregger
#10
Thread Starter

ORIGINAL: Ed Cregger
I'm with you. I prefer the Tiporare (standard size).
<snip>
Just my opinion.
Ed Cregger
I'm with you. I prefer the Tiporare (standard size).
<snip>
Just my opinion.
Ed Cregger
I think you guys have sold me. I was leaning towards the Tipo anyway, and all the positive comments are cementing it. I have to draw the wing planform and airfoil section for whatever I get cut, if I get time I may do both and get both cut just so I never run out of building projects in the middle of a long winter stretch. Yeah, like that will happen...

Thanks for the input guys,
Mark



