Propeller Equivalencies
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Riverside, CT
One of the most common questions on forums concerns which propeller to use. The following article describes a simple formula to estimate propeller equivalents:
[link=http://www.ampaviators.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=51&Itemi d=42]Propeller Equivalencies[/link]
The formula: PLF = Diameter^3 x Pitch
[link=http://www.ampaviators.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=51&Itemi d=42]Propeller Equivalencies[/link]
The formula: PLF = Diameter^3 x Pitch
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Riverside, CT
I asked Lucien about this and his response is below:
"There are several formulas out there that are close but not accurate over a wide range of props. I did a very in-depth study of propeller loads about 15 years ago, and through actual experimentation and extrapolation, I came up with the simplified formula that I use today.
You can use a D x D x P formula in a very narrow range of props for one size motor or even a group if motor sizes, but what you are doing is taking the slope of a curve, and as you get further and further away from your initial starting point, the equation gets less and less accurate.
When I used the D x D x D x P formula, I tested it on everything from a 4x2 prop all the way up to a 76x56 prop used on a Cessna 172, and it worked for every single prop."
"There are several formulas out there that are close but not accurate over a wide range of props. I did a very in-depth study of propeller loads about 15 years ago, and through actual experimentation and extrapolation, I came up with the simplified formula that I use today.
You can use a D x D x P formula in a very narrow range of props for one size motor or even a group if motor sizes, but what you are doing is taking the slope of a curve, and as you get further and further away from your initial starting point, the equation gets less and less accurate.
When I used the D x D x D x P formula, I tested it on everything from a 4x2 prop all the way up to a 76x56 prop used on a Cessna 172, and it worked for every single prop."
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Naersnes, NORWAY
OK, thanks for the explanation 
Then my "old" way to calculate when testing props on one motor were not bad then. You gave me a good input here CitaFly!

Then my "old" way to calculate when testing props on one motor were not bad then. You gave me a good input here CitaFly!



