those prop changes
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (7)
I have a nice light simple stick, and with an out runner brush-less motor and an 8 cell pack I get about 9 minutes duration with a 9x7 gws prop, now if I change the prop to a faster turning 5x4 the white push on kind that are very efficient and very light, can I still get the power and more speed as if it were a flying wing type plane and yet have at least 7-9 minutes of flying time?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
If you are using a 9x7 now, and the power is acceptable, but you are looking for a little more top speed, something around a 7x7, 7x8, 8x7 would be the range I would look at. Going all the way down to something like a 5x4 is going to give you next to nothing in terms of overall power.
#3
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (7)
ORIGINAL: ADChobbystore
If you are using a 9x7 now, and the power is acceptable, but you are looking for a little more top speed, something around a 7x7, 7x8, 8x7 would be the range I would look at. Going all the way down to something like a 5x4 is going to give you next to nothing in terms of overall power.
If you are using a 9x7 now, and the power is acceptable, but you are looking for a little more top speed, something around a 7x7, 7x8, 8x7 would be the range I would look at. Going all the way down to something like a 5x4 is going to give you next to nothing in terms of overall power.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Yes, you should still be able to throttle back at times to conserve battery juice. The main difference you will notice is that you will have to have the throttle up a little higher on the stick, but it basically all balances out, since the prop. will be a bit smaller and most likely pull less amps than the 9x7. Your flight times will be relatively close to what you are getting now, they should be a tad longer due to less current draw.
#5
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (7)
ORIGINAL: ADChobbystore
Yes, you should still be able to throttle back at times to conserve battery juice. The main difference you will notice is that you will have to have the throttle up a little higher on the stick, but it basically all balances out, since the prop. will be a bit smaller and most likely pull less amps than the 9x7. Your flight times will be relatively close to what you are getting now, they should be a tad longer due to less current draw.
Yes, you should still be able to throttle back at times to conserve battery juice. The main difference you will notice is that you will have to have the throttle up a little higher on the stick, but it basically all balances out, since the prop. will be a bit smaller and most likely pull less amps than the 9x7. Your flight times will be relatively close to what you are getting now, they should be a tad longer due to less current draw.
Thanks again .
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: CanberraACT, AUSTRALIA
I might be wrong but it was my understanding that in general a bigger prop was *more* effecient. You go to smaller props because:
- You can spin the prop because of ground clearance
- You are after pitch speed more than thrust
If you want longer flight duration reduce the throttle - I think going to a smaller prop will probably make it worse.
Reducing or increasing prop size is typically about either increasing top speed and pitch speed, or increasing thrust - flight duration is a different topic.
- You can spin the prop because of ground clearance
- You are after pitch speed more than thrust
If you want longer flight duration reduce the throttle - I think going to a smaller prop will probably make it worse.
Reducing or increasing prop size is typically about either increasing top speed and pitch speed, or increasing thrust - flight duration is a different topic.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
ORIGINAL: ozrcboy
I might be wrong but it was my understanding that in general a bigger prop was *more* effecient. You go to smaller props because:
- You can spin the prop because of ground clearance
- You are after pitch speed more than thrust
If you want longer flight duration reduce the throttle - I think going to a smaller prop will probably make it worse.
Reducing or increasing prop size is typically about either increasing top speed and pitch speed, or increasing thrust - flight duration is a different topic.
I might be wrong but it was my understanding that in general a bigger prop was *more* effecient. You go to smaller props because:
- You can spin the prop because of ground clearance
- You are after pitch speed more than thrust
If you want longer flight duration reduce the throttle - I think going to a smaller prop will probably make it worse.
Reducing or increasing prop size is typically about either increasing top speed and pitch speed, or increasing thrust - flight duration is a different topic.


This is at least, my experience based on testing with several different planes and power systems.I took his inquiry as he was looking for a little more speed out of the plane, but with a comparable flight time. Bumping down in prop. dia, and up in pitch should accomplish that.



