RJL head
#1
Thread Starter
RJL head
I presently have one on a golden bee type 049. It has a Davis crank in it. I haven't gotten around to run it yet. I don't know what to expect out of that RJL, don't know much about them.
I'm not sure what prop to use, I plan to start with a 6/4. If it runs good, I've no idea what to put it in. Any ideas? maybe a texaco?
Ted
I'm not sure what prop to use, I plan to start with a 6/4. If it runs good, I've no idea what to put it in. Any ideas? maybe a texaco?
Ted
#3
RE: RJL head
Ted,
Even with a Davis crank, try a 7-3 or 7-4 first. You may get enough RPM, at softer compression and a bit richer needle... thus less fiddly to work with...
If all is well, and you need a bit more - THEN try a 6-4 (or 6-5 if you find one). The only thing that annoyed me about the DDD .049 conversions was that a bit too hot, or overcompressed, might burn through the head seal - needing replacement before the next run. That was years ago, Bob D may have changed things since...
Even with a Davis crank, try a 7-3 or 7-4 first. You may get enough RPM, at softer compression and a bit richer needle... thus less fiddly to work with...
If all is well, and you need a bit more - THEN try a 6-4 (or 6-5 if you find one). The only thing that annoyed me about the DDD .049 conversions was that a bit too hot, or overcompressed, might burn through the head seal - needing replacement before the next run. That was years ago, Bob D may have changed things since...
#4
Senior Member
RE: RJL head
I've had some success with a Golden Bee running an RJL head and a DDD heavy duty crank. I do use a Sure Start style snap starter with it. Makes a nice sport engine with a 7x3 or 7x4 wooden prop. I've also bench run this set up with a 6x6 Graupner, a combination that would surely be way too fast for me in the air and probably break con rods on a regular basis.
There's a great thread in the 1/2A forum that in part discusses this conversion: [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_4085390/anchors_4085390/mpage_1/key_Cox%252C049%252CTexaco/anchor/tm.htm#4085390]RJL on a reedie[/link]
There's a great thread in the 1/2A forum that in part discusses this conversion: [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_4085390/anchors_4085390/mpage_1/key_Cox%252C049%252CTexaco/anchor/tm.htm#4085390]RJL on a reedie[/link]
#5
Thread Starter
RE: RJL head
Thanks I'll read the thread, I still don't know much about these diesels.
I've got one of Lee Stengal's Humming Bird 049's maybe I'll stick it on that.
Ted
I've got one of Lee Stengal's Humming Bird 049's maybe I'll stick it on that.
Ted
#6
RE: RJL head
ORIGINAL: Lou Crane
...The only thing that annoyed me about the DDD .049 conversions was that a bit too hot, or overcompressed, might burn through the head seal - needing replacement before the next run. That was years ago, Bob D may have changed things since...
...The only thing that annoyed me about the DDD .049 conversions was that a bit too hot, or overcompressed, might burn through the head seal - needing replacement before the next run. That was years ago, Bob D may have changed things since...
That feature was one of the things Davis touted as an advantage of his head. The idea is that running over-compressed (and thus overheated) would blow the seal instead of your engine. Some like that feature, some don't. I do.
George
#7
Senior Member
RE: RJL head
I like the burn out feature, too. It really started working for me on Pee Wee .020s when I went to a thinner teflon seal than Davis supplied originally. It was easier to cut new seals than go to the hobby shop and pick up another crank or a piston/cylinder assembly. A Pee Wee turning a 6x2 or 6x3 wooden prop is a pretty stout engine.
Lou,
That feature was one of the things Davis touted as an advantage of his head. The idea is that running over-compressed (and thus overheated) would blow the seal instead of your engine. Some like that feature, some don't. I do.
George
Lou,
That feature was one of the things Davis touted as an advantage of his head. The idea is that running over-compressed (and thus overheated) would blow the seal instead of your engine. Some like that feature, some don't. I do.
George
#8
RE: RJL head
GCB and lildiesel,
Noted and thanks! I'm one who didn't enjoy it, but then I tend to run engines continuously for several minutes at fixed needle in CL flight. Variable loads in maneuvers may have increased the frequency of burn-through, and too many times it was during a flight...
BTW, I think the Cox .049 conversion was Bob's first product... Sure worked well enough to kick off the great line he now offers!
Noted and thanks! I'm one who didn't enjoy it, but then I tend to run engines continuously for several minutes at fixed needle in CL flight. Variable loads in maneuvers may have increased the frequency of burn-through, and too many times it was during a flight...
BTW, I think the Cox .049 conversion was Bob's first product... Sure worked well enough to kick off the great line he now offers!
#9
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Smyrna,
TN
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: RJL head
Hi Lou,
The most common cause of disc burn out is a varnished (insulated) cylinder from running a lot of castor. when the Norvell .060 (6X4's) 18 to 19000 Rpm came out we started getting calls on excessive burn out which we attributed much higher power then TD's so we added an aluminum disc then teflon and the problem when away. The discs can be cut from pop can's.
Bob Davis
Davis Diesel
The most common cause of disc burn out is a varnished (insulated) cylinder from running a lot of castor. when the Norvell .060 (6X4's) 18 to 19000 Rpm came out we started getting calls on excessive burn out which we attributed much higher power then TD's so we added an aluminum disc then teflon and the problem when away. The discs can be cut from pop can's.
Bob Davis
Davis Diesel