2/4 problem?
05-29-2011 | 08:32 AM
#2
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Summerfield,
NC
RE: 2/4 problem?
Its 2.4 not 2/4, but anyway, I have a 1/3 scale Fokker D-VIII powered by a Zenoag GT-80 stock mag using a Spektrum DX7 with the AR7000 reciever. After two seasons of flying, not one single glitch.
05-29-2011 | 09:30 AM
#4
My Feedback: (5)
RE: 2/4 problem?
Art, What's you're problem and are you following all the guide lines for R/C and gas engine installation?
Here's what Futaba recommends.
http://www.futaba-rc.com/faq/faq-gas.html
Dan.
Here's what Futaba recommends.
http://www.futaba-rc.com/faq/faq-gas.html
Dan.
05-29-2011 | 10:15 AM
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: 2/4 problem?
This is on sort of a tangent to the orignal question but I remember how so many posting in this forum were so excited that 2.4 was going to be their radio installation salvation when the spectrum was opened up. Oh the speculation that was running rampant back then, and the vociferous arguement that was received when anyone offered any disagreement with those positions. Radios would no longer be impacted by ignition generated EMI. 2.4 was "immune" from interference.
Funny how each frequency type or spread has carried with it the same delusions. Happened with AM, then FM, followed once again by 2.4. Probably be viewed the same with 5.8 if and when things go that way.
Funny how each frequency type or spread has carried with it the same delusions. Happened with AM, then FM, followed once again by 2.4. Probably be viewed the same with 5.8 if and when things go that way.
05-29-2011 | 10:34 AM
#6
RE: 2/4 problem?
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
This is on sort of a tangent to the orignial question but I remember how so many posting in this forum were so excited that 2.4 was going to be their radio installation salvation when the spectrum was opened up. Oh the speculation that was running rampant back then, and the vociferous arguement that was received when anyone offered any disagreement with those positions. Radios would no longer be impacted by ignition generated EMI. 2.4 was "immune" from interference.
Funny how each frequency type or spread has carried with it the same delusions. Happened with AM, then FM, followed once again by 2.4. Probably be viewed the same with 5.8 if and when things go that way.
This is on sort of a tangent to the orignial question but I remember how so many posting in this forum were so excited that 2.4 was going to be their radio installation salvation when the spectrum was opened up. Oh the speculation that was running rampant back then, and the vociferous arguement that was received when anyone offered any disagreement with those positions. Radios would no longer be impacted by ignition generated EMI. 2.4 was "immune" from interference.
Funny how each frequency type or spread has carried with it the same delusions. Happened with AM, then FM, followed once again by 2.4. Probably be viewed the same with 5.8 if and when things go that way.
05-29-2011 | 11:08 AM
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: 2/4 problem?
True, but mis-named.
I've used all of them with gas engines and the only time I had an EMI issue with any of them was when I did something wrong. Hell, I've never even gotten radio "hits" from other users on any them. However, I've seen a great many people running up and down a runway yelling "I'm getting hit, I'm getting hit".........
I've used all of them with gas engines and the only time I had an EMI issue with any of them was when I did something wrong. Hell, I've never even gotten radio "hits" from other users on any them. However, I've seen a great many people running up and down a runway yelling "I'm getting hit, I'm getting hit".........
