G62 Lite
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Here's a later version of the 4 lb G62, now 3 lbs, 12 oz...ALL parts are there, no muffler...
The ignition parts will be put in the black box, the little aluminum hub goes on the crank under the prop hub shown....The bear was just sitting there...
The ignition parts will be put in the black box, the little aluminum hub goes on the crank under the prop hub shown....The bear was just sitting there...
#15
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
stock G62 modified, 3 lbs 12 oz..I don't think the fins made much difference, there were 3 broken ones on the front so I just took the diameter down some..The first lite 62 had stock fins, weighed 4 lbs with ignition in the mount..This one has a separate ignition with a 3W shielded cap and wire and a CM6 spark plug...The smaller chainsaw crank weighs a little less but is smaller on the tapered end, so not as resistant to bending..If I still had access to my toolgrinder friend he could grind a taper on the straight end..I did it a few times on the Sachs 4.2 cranks that are made that way..Worked great...I think another manufacturer does this but leaves it straight..with a 3.2 Sachs 2 piece crank
...It's a good idea..the straight end has the big end crank pin ground as one piece on the counterweight side, and the rear part presses onto the front...Less likely to twist...
...It's a good idea..the straight end has the big end crank pin ground as one piece on the counterweight side, and the rear part presses onto the front...Less likely to twist...
#16

My Feedback: (30)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ithaca, NY
Ralph,
Thanks for the info.
Nogyro,
For 3W engines, the cc displacement is a very good estimate of the fuel consumption in cc/min at wide open throttle. This estimate slightly over estimates the fuel consumption for single cylinder engines and slightly underestimates the fuel consumption for twins. A 3w-50 burns 50 cc/min or 1.67 oz/min at WOT. I didn't know if the G-62 followed the same trend.
Elson
Thanks for the info.
Nogyro,
For 3W engines, the cc displacement is a very good estimate of the fuel consumption in cc/min at wide open throttle. This estimate slightly over estimates the fuel consumption for single cylinder engines and slightly underestimates the fuel consumption for twins. A 3w-50 burns 50 cc/min or 1.67 oz/min at WOT. I didn't know if the G-62 followed the same trend.
Elson
#17

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Puryear, TN
rc bugman,
I ran a G62 on a 20 lb. Giant Stinger for 3 years, but never ran it full throttle for a full flight.
I always used 12 to 14 oz. on a 15 minute flight, mostly sport flying and learning to hover. Generally I was at 1/2 to 3/4 throttle most of the time.
I ran a G62 on a 20 lb. Giant Stinger for 3 years, but never ran it full throttle for a full flight.
I always used 12 to 14 oz. on a 15 minute flight, mostly sport flying and learning to hover. Generally I was at 1/2 to 3/4 throttle most of the time.



