Expanded Use of Ignition Battery Question
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (55)
I am assembling an Aeroworks Cessna 195 that comes with a set of running lights and it will be powered by a DLE 30. I was thinking of simplifying things by using an A123 2S1P 2300 mah battery (in series with a IN4007 silicon diode) to power both the ignition and the lights. The lights would be turned on/off by a separate Rcexl remote switch. My concern is whether the switch end of the remote switch will prevent any ignition noise from being radiated through the lighting wire harness or does the remote switch only prevent ignition noise from reaching to the receiver connection? I think I said that correctly
Howard
Howard
#3

My Feedback: (2)
http://www.himodel.com/engines/Rcexl...itch_v1.2.html
The way I read the specs this is a optic kill switch which does nothing to prevent RFI ignition noise from reaching the receiver.
John
The way I read the specs this is a optic kill switch which does nothing to prevent RFI ignition noise from reaching the receiver.
John
#4

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Riverton,
WY
It is optical coupled to prevent RIF from the ignition getting to the RX.
To use it as Howard wants would place noise on the landing lights and the wires would act as antennas and possibly send the noise in to the servos. BUT his RX would be protected noise from the ignition battery, BUT not from noise sent back from the servos.
So probably all in all a bad idea. But with a separate landing light battery it would be OK.
To use it as Howard wants would place noise on the landing lights and the wires would act as antennas and possibly send the noise in to the servos. BUT his RX would be protected noise from the ignition battery, BUT not from noise sent back from the servos.
So probably all in all a bad idea. But with a separate landing light battery it would be OK.
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (55)
ORIGINAL: tkg
It is optical coupled to prevent RIF from the ignition getting to the RX.
To use it as Howard wants would place noise on the landing lights and the wires would act as antennas and possibly send the noise in to the servos. BUT his RX would be protected noise from the ignition battery, BUT not from noise sent back from the servos.
So probably all in all a bad idea. But with a separate landing light battery it would be OK.
It is optical coupled to prevent RIF from the ignition getting to the RX.
To use it as Howard wants would place noise on the landing lights and the wires would act as antennas and possibly send the noise in to the servos. BUT his RX would be protected noise from the ignition battery, BUT not from noise sent back from the servos.
So probably all in all a bad idea. But with a separate landing light battery it would be OK.
You have very accurately identified my concern that if the power sent to the lighting system is not filtered from the ignition noise then the lighting system becomes an antenna to radiate the noise. As you stated the solution is to use a separate battery for the lighting, which I had hoped I might be able to omit I think I will leave it in.
Howard
#6

My Feedback: (2)
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (55)
ORIGINAL: JNorton
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
Howard
#9

My Feedback: (5)
Howard, you're not saying it wrong, you're doing it wrong. The RFI from the ignition will be in the ignition battery pack. The wires from that battery pack to the lights will act as antennas for the RFI and radiate throughout the model all over your receiver system. Dan.
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (55)
ORIGINAL: DAN REISS
Howard, you're not saying it wrong, you're doing it wrong. The RFI from the ignition will be in the ignition battery pack. The wires from that battery pack to the lights will act as antennas for the RFI and radiate throughout the model all over your receiver system. Dan.
Howard, you're not saying it wrong, you're doing it wrong. The RFI from the ignition will be in the ignition battery pack. The wires from that battery pack to the lights will act as antennas for the RFI and radiate throughout the model all over your receiver system. Dan.
Howard
#13

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Riverton,
WY
There is no DC pathway between the RX ground and power lead and the battery leads for the ign.
1/2 of the switch gets its power from the RX and the other half gets its power from the ignition battery. The optic coupler just passes frame rate info.
1/2 of the switch gets its power from the RX and the other half gets its power from the ignition battery. The optic coupler just passes frame rate info.
ORIGINAL: JNorton
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
#14

My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: tkg
There is no DC pathway between the RX ground and power lead and the battery leads for the ign.
1/2 of the switch gets its power from the RX and the other half gets its power from the ignition battery. The optic coupler just passes frame rate info.
There is no DC pathway between the RX ground and power lead and the battery leads for the ign.
1/2 of the switch gets its power from the RX and the other half gets its power from the ignition battery. The optic coupler just passes frame rate info.
ORIGINAL: JNorton
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
TKG,
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought the switch is opto coupled to the FET that passes the voltage to the receiver. This means the switch leads cannot pickup RFI but the FET can still transmit ignition noise. So if the ignition battery is the same as the receiver battery there is no RFI protection from the ignition feeding noise into the receiver. The unit is not designed to work as an ignition battery eliminator.
John
#15

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lakewood,
CO
I have been successfully using the Wike R/C battery eliminators for some time now, I power everything on the plane, including the EI modile with 1 single A-123 battery.
This is what I use -> http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/items/WRCIBEF.html
This is what I use -> http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/items/WRCIBEF.html




