detecting peak engine temp
#51

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: RTK
I have been running on board temp monitors for over 5 years now, I know just about where every manufacturers engines will run when tuned properly. Some are higher than others some are lower. I would never push ''some'' of the chinese engines to higher temps.
I have been running on board temp monitors for over 5 years now, I know just about where every manufacturers engines will run when tuned properly. Some are higher than others some are lower. I would never push ''some'' of the chinese engines to higher temps.
DL50?
DA-50r?
I just dug up an older version of Eagle Tree Systems flight data recorder I bought when they first came out. I installed the temp sensor in the upper most fins of my DA-50r, and am waiting till the weekend to run it. So, I'm curious as to what temps I should see.
#56

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
If you limit any of them to 155C you would do well.
If you limit any of them to 155C you would do well.
Regarding the 3 responses I got; yours was factual & usefull, 2 others were useless.
#57

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
Mine statement that it would be below 155C was in response to TOMs answer that 155C is a good number to shoot for or stay around, It all depends on your tuning, baffling, extraction and flying habits sensor placement, etc. I have no idea of those, There are many factors that come into play, but I will say it again, I doubt you will hit 155C.
Pe was just having a little fun, that's what makes these boards interesting to read.
Next time I get to Indiana I might have to check out some of the flying sites.
Pe was just having a little fun, that's what makes these boards interesting to read.
Next time I get to Indiana I might have to check out some of the flying sites.
#58
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
I can guarantee that if the head of a DA 50 wasn't exposed to the weather he could hit it. Tuned lean even exposed it could be done on a medium long upline. Just about all our engines have no trouble tapping that number under the right conditions. Just give him a nice round cowl Yak with no exit area aside from that tiny little scoop on the bottom. Done deal with those puppies.
#59

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
I can guarantee that if the head of a DA 50 wasn't exposed to the weather he could hit it.
I can guarantee that if the head of a DA 50 wasn't exposed to the weather he could hit it.
The one w/checkered pattern on cowl is the SD 260-Extra w/DL50.
{jug partially exposed}
The other photo is the GP Ultimate 1.60 w/DA-50r
{jug fully exposed}
#61
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: a1pcfixer
Thanks!
Regarding the 3 responses I got; yours was factual & usefull, 2 others were useless.
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
If you limit any of them to 155C you would do well.
If you limit any of them to 155C you would do well.
Regarding the 3 responses I got; yours was factual & usefull, 2 others were useless.
If you check all the words I have written on the subject here, you might just find a few useful facts. If you dont do your reading, don't be offended if I pull your leg.
The key in my response:
less power is less heat. Less heat is a cooler engine, even with mediocre cooling.
#62
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
I work with some pedigreed program managers that can't put that together. They make a call for more power so you give it to them. Then they complain it runs hotter than the last one....... It gets better. After getting more power they complain they don't have flight duration as long as they did before. You can't win.
BTW, less than an hour at 210 and the front seals get to leaking oil. All this stuff should have some distributors reviewing their warranty claim restrictions
BTW, less than an hour at 210 and the front seals get to leaking oil. All this stuff should have some distributors reviewing their warranty claim restrictions
#64

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: pe reivers
Hey, get a life!
If you check all the words I have written on the subject here, you might just find a few useful facts. If you dont do your reading, don't be offended if I pull your leg.
The key in my response:
less power is less heat. Less heat is a cooler engine, even with mediocre cooling.
Hey, get a life!
If you check all the words I have written on the subject here, you might just find a few useful facts. If you dont do your reading, don't be offended if I pull your leg.
The key in my response:
less power is less heat. Less heat is a cooler engine, even with mediocre cooling.
If you'd posted your last two sentences (above) instead of what you did, we'd not be at this point.
From your sig line I take it you run a business, so I didn't expect you to ditz my choice of engines.
We all have bad days.....time to move on.
If I wanted a heated discussion, I'd just mention AMSOIL to T.O.M. and we're off!
#66

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: pe reivers
Hey, get a life!
If you check all the words I have written on the subject here, you might just find a few useful facts. If you dont do your reading, don't be offended if I pull your leg.
The key in my response:
less power is less heat. Less heat is a cooler engine, even with mediocre cooling.
Hey, get a life!
If you check all the words I have written on the subject here, you might just find a few useful facts. If you dont do your reading, don't be offended if I pull your leg.
The key in my response:
less power is less heat. Less heat is a cooler engine, even with mediocre cooling.
Time to move on.
#67
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
I work with some pedigreed program managers that can't put that together. They make a call for more power so you give it to them. Then they complain it runs hotter than the last one....... It gets better. After getting more power they complain they don't have flight duration as long as they did before. You can't win.
........Heat damage is accumulative. A few minutes here, a few minutes there....
I work with some pedigreed program managers that can't put that together. They make a call for more power so you give it to them. Then they complain it runs hotter than the last one....... It gets better. After getting more power they complain they don't have flight duration as long as they did before. You can't win.
........Heat damage is accumulative. A few minutes here, a few minutes there....
Heat energy => Mechanical energy (applied to prop) + Heat energy (wasted to atmosphere)
More burnt fuel / time => More heat energy / time (Achievable with higher displacement (heavier engine) and/or higher rpm's)
Higher compression ratio => More heat energy / time (Premature explosion is the limit)
More Heat energy used as Mechanical energy (applied to prop) => Less Heat energy (wasted to atmosphere) (Limit is the lubrication and metals)
#68

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
If you limit any of them to 155C you would do well.
If you limit any of them to 155C you would do well.
Verticle bars are when flight data recorder unit was started each time.
Temp rise just before 3rd verticle bar is just before take-off where foam came out from under flight data recorder and I shut it down.
After the 3rd verticle bar is the actual flight. Highest temp (184.8F) was achieved during one of the sustained hovers.
At approximately 8min - 40sec the rapid temp drop occurs as the sensor came loose.
#71

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
Are you certain that's in farenheit? Check the values selected.
Are you certain that's in farenheit? Check the values selected.
On this 2nd graph, look at the gauge on left, and text on lower right-hand bottom.
#73

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
Right where the top of the combustion chamber would be??
I figured you would be a little higher than that if you were not tuned rich and had the sensor towards the top on the back side.
I figured you would be a little higher than that if you were not tuned rich and had the sensor towards the top on the back side.
#75

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Porte,
IN
It must be somewhat rich. I went from an inverted wrap around pitts style (twin pipe), to a stock (single pipe) muffler. It's now got a slight gurgle in low -to- mid range.
I'm flying a GP Ultimate 1.60 ARF at about 16.5# w/DA-50r engine, plus smoke system. It'll hover at 40-50% throttle.
Soon as I decide on which muffler to stick with (testing for smoke systems output), then I'll tune it better.
I'm flying a GP Ultimate 1.60 ARF at about 16.5# w/DA-50r engine, plus smoke system. It'll hover at 40-50% throttle.
Soon as I decide on which muffler to stick with (testing for smoke systems output), then I'll tune it better.


