Community
Search
Notices
Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic Discuss all your 3D & Aerobatic giant scale airplanes right here!

PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2004 | 05:04 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Plano, TX
Default PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

Chip,

I have used the three most common methods of controlling the elevator. Pull/pull, c.f rod to a MK bellcrank and most recently the .070 c.f rods set in a ladder type arrangement like Troy newman does.

What are your thoughts on each of these and what is your preferred method or tried and true way?

Wayne Galligan
Old 01-21-2004 | 01:50 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (55)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Tomball, TX
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

Did you like the .070 pushrods with the ladder and do you think it was worth the trouble?
.070 sure looks small for this big of an airplane.

tommy s
Old 01-21-2004 | 07:23 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Plano, TX
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

THats what I thought at first. But the c.f. rods are very stiff and light weight. There are mininum connections between the servo and elevator horn. The MK set is good but there are 6 connections plus you have the bell crank horns that can flex.
Old 01-23-2004 | 02:05 AM
  #4  
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Tucson, AZ
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

ORIGINAL: TOYMAKER

Chip,

I have used the three most common methods of controlling the elevator. Pull/pull, c.f rod to a MK bellcrank and most recently the .070 c.f rods set in a ladder type arrangement like Troy newman does.

What are your thoughts on each of these and what is your preferred method or tried and true way?

Wayne Galligan
I do not care for the MK setup or pull pull at all for elev. The little carbon rod system looks good to me, however I cannot see it really being superior to the tried and tru pushrod. My dad did it in 1986 on our Zlin and it did not feel any more solid then the Dalotels did at the time. Also seems like a lot of work.

Chip
Old 02-09-2004 | 03:34 AM
  #5  
My Feedback: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bolivia, NC
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

Chip,
Why do you not like the MK bellcrank set up?
Other than more connections are there other issues?
Thanks
Old 02-16-2004 | 11:42 PM
  #6  
mithrandir's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,192
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: adelanto, CA
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

I like the PULL-PULL so that when the hinges deteriorate on the control surface, They will be in the same smoking pile as the rest of the model and you need not go chasing after them!!! LOL
Old 02-17-2004 | 05:36 PM
  #7  
My Feedback: (55)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Tomball, TX
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

The MK bellcrank set up is probably a couple of ounces more weight than
a good carbon fibre pushrod set up, and since it is made of plastic there is
the potential for flexing. I've got two of them working and haven't seen any
problems yet but I do think when I build my next airplane I will use the
double .070" carbon fiber pushrods. Less linkage to hook up and less to go
wrong although the initial set up takes a little more time.

tommy s
Old 02-19-2004 | 06:42 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Plano, TX
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

If you use the MK bellcrank DO NOT use stand offs from the control horns when using a ball link. This just adds to the leverage and twist on the control horn. Otherwise they are a pretty stiff setup when using the c.f rods and titanium ends. Also pricer then the pushrod setup or pull/pull.

I have tried the double .070 c.f pushrod on my latest setup and so far so good. Very light and I think it eliminates and variable like the pushrod flexing at the "Y". However like Chip said a good pushrod setup is about as good as any.

I know a a fellow who recently had problems breaking his stab at the center joint. He was flying a pull/pull setup and the control horn was not directley over the hinge line. It was set ahead of the hingeline causing the lines to tighten as the surface was moved. He broke the stab twice before someone discovered this and then the after the fix his servo rail failed(from previous stressing I assume) and ended up re-kitting the airplane. So there are some important thingsin a pull/pull system that need to be followed. A pushrod eliminates those possible conditions. Only thing about a pull/pull I like thought is the small adjustment settings one can make with it.

Wayne G.
Old 02-19-2004 | 08:20 PM
  #9  
apereira's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,740
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: PULL/PULL VS PUSHRODS

More parts, more play, short stiff push rods last longer.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.