Master K vs APC
#52
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: Lifer
I get a little nervous when someone modifies props. Sanding them thinner seems counter-productive. Let's keep the comparisons to stock props!
I get a little nervous when someone modifies props. Sanding them thinner seems counter-productive. Let's keep the comparisons to stock props!
If needed, I do cut down (1/8-1/4") the MA S-2 props and re-shape to original tip configuration, far easier than getting that bit of washout that APC does to their tips. Ever notice how performance sensitive APC's are to minor tip damage? I've got a ten years collection box worth
#54
ORIGINAL: blw
You can't claim that for any prop. Every engine, prop, and airframe combination will perform diferently for whatever profile you fly.
ORIGINAL: jaka
And in the air the 10x6 RAM and Graupner Cam-prop are slightly better than the 10x6 APC.
And in the air the 10x6 RAM and Graupner Cam-prop are slightly better than the 10x6 APC.
#55

My Feedback: (3)
It's still the same thing. You have to tach them in the air at the speed you fly. Still, everything is a tradeoff with components. You will always find exceptions to any rule that this prop is better, etc. Just the shape of a cowl may make the MA better than the APC you are testing, etc. Few of us go to those lengths. We have a handful of props that we are familiar with, and we use those where they seem best.
Dave, how about that pic of your prop wall again?
Dave, how about that pic of your prop wall again?
#63
Senior Member
In my Katana 70 profile 3-D plane the Master Schimitare S-2 14-6 provided way better pullout from hover than APC 14-6. Engine was a magnum .91 fs. The master was clearly the best choice in this particular application anyway
#64
ORIGINAL: asmund
In my Katana 70 profile 3-D plane the Master Schimitare S-2 14-6 provided way better pullout from hover than APC 14-6. Engine was a magnum .91 fs. The master was clearly the best choice in this particular application anyway
In my Katana 70 profile 3-D plane the Master Schimitare S-2 14-6 provided way better pullout from hover than APC 14-6. Engine was a magnum .91 fs. The master was clearly the best choice in this particular application anyway
The few MA K-series props I have balanced quite easily, closer to zero balance than any of the APC's I have gotten.
#65
Senior Member
My next combo will be a Saito 62 with a Zinger Pro 12X7 on the Epade. According to the Prop Power Calculator the Zinger has a 1.25 value while the APC has 1.2. Ihave high hopes for it, its a great looking prop too.
#66

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,995
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hervey Bay Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Nice to see some Bolly's the collections lads!
I am scared to look at how many props I have ... it is scary
.
Here are a few random examples.
A nice article on prop airfoil sections:
http://www.supercoolprops.com/articl...pdrairfoil.php
I am scared to look at how many props I have ... it is scary
.Here are a few random examples.
A nice article on prop airfoil sections:
http://www.supercoolprops.com/articl...pdrairfoil.php




