G75-G90 differences?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Why should I buy a Supertigre G75 instead of a G90? The G90 has more power in the same dimensions and price is just 7-8 bucks more… the only thing I can think of is the different fuel consumption. Is that an issue?
thanks
david
thanks
david
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: HASTINGS, UNITED KINGDOM
Go for the 90. You can always throttle back or put a larger prop on it if its a bit over powered. Also you have more scope for future planes. Fuel consumption will be slighly more only if you are using the extra power
Jim
Jim
#5

My Feedback: (16)
The G90 with the one piece crankcase with the larger rear bearing and the smaller intake passages is considered to be the lugger. But I still like the 14-6 or 13-8 on the G90's. I've tried the 15-8 and 16-6 on them and they perform like the book says but spool up from idle is slow. They would perhaps, work 'OK' in a scale situation where you were trying to get out beyond the cowl. I get 11,000 with a 14-6 APC and the 108 carb. The 40 carb only gives you about 10,000.
The S90K is the one you are talking about with the two piece crankcase and the squarish head. They look somewhat more massive than the G90.
The S90 is the one with a crankcase a lot like the S90K but it has a round machined head that is sunken in the middle.
The last truely Italion made G90's to come from Italy had a '40' carb on them for some reason. They do a lot better even with the big props when using a ST carb with the flat sidded spray bar or by using a Magnum 108 carb which bolts right in.
They all seem happy with a 14-6. prop
In a diesel situation, the round sided spraybar '40' carb would be better.
Enjoy,
Jim
The S90K is the one you are talking about with the two piece crankcase and the squarish head. They look somewhat more massive than the G90.
The S90 is the one with a crankcase a lot like the S90K but it has a round machined head that is sunken in the middle.
The last truely Italion made G90's to come from Italy had a '40' carb on them for some reason. They do a lot better even with the big props when using a ST carb with the flat sidded spray bar or by using a Magnum 108 carb which bolts right in.
They all seem happy with a 14-6. prop
In a diesel situation, the round sided spraybar '40' carb would be better.
Enjoy,
Jim
#8
So I should expect about 11K with a 14-6? What fuel, is it limited to low nitro? I have a red head ASP .91 that turns a 14-6 well over 11K but cannot use over 5% nitro. Also weighs a bunch more.
#10

My Feedback: (29)
My S75 is a very user freindly engine, a little more so than my g90, the 90 will pull a 14-6 zinger 10,400 and the 75 will only make 10,000. I used both engines in the same airframe and the power differences diminish if you prop the 75 to turn about 1000 more rpm. The 75 with a 12-8 performed about same as the G90 with a 12-10. The 90 WILL cook a piston faster if run too lean for too long.
#11

My Feedback: (26)
If a person was looking between these two engines with the intentions of mounting it on a Top Flite warbird, you might want the .75. The .75 will run with the Top Flite in-cowl muffler , but it is too restrictive for the .90, and will cause it to overheat. Other than that, the only reason to buy the .75 over the .90 would be if you got a really great deal on it.
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bella Vista,
AR
My brother put a 90 in a 60 size extra...the larger prop would ground-out on takeoff or landings. He wasn't happy, and had to make larger main gear (taller), which made the model look "odd".
Charles
Charles



