Cheapy on a pipe
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: nairn, UNITED KINGDOM
Does anyone know if a Thunder Tiger 46 Pro will come on to a pipe?? Thinking about one for a pattern plane but i'm greedy for performance so I want a pipe. Thanks in advance
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: nairn, UNITED KINGDOM
Ok, thanks very much, I'll give it a go. Do you know of a reliable method for finding the starting length, I've got a piped 48 on another plane and everyone tells me to do different things, one told me it was too short, so I lengthened it, then another (semi-pro) told me to make it even shorter than it was before???!!!! I did find a formula on an Australian pattern site but that didn't seem to help.
Oh, the joys,
Thanks for the help.
Oh, the joys,

Thanks for the help.
#4

My Feedback: (16)
http://www.macspro.com/tuning.asp
Read these?
You will need to run a smaller prop so the engine will get up into the rpm area where the pipe will be more effective.
Enjoy,
Jim
Read these?
You will need to run a smaller prop so the engine will get up into the rpm area where the pipe will be more effective.
Enjoy,
Jim
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: nairn, UNITED KINGDOM
Excellent, thats EXACTLY what im looking for. And looking at that i'd say my 'even shorter' pipe is still too long. Problem is, with it being for a pattern model, noise is a big thing, and I don't really want it spinning at stupid revs, was hoping to load it up a wee bit and keep the revs down to about 11k? any thoughts?
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (145)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Picayune, MS
If you are looking to turn only 11k with the TT .46, you surely dont need a tuned pipe. Tuned pipes are generally is for seeking high performance at high speeds. Generally "tuned" for a small range of rpms. I doubt the TT .46 running a pipe at 11k will affect the performance of your pattern airframe. I'd stick with the stock muffler.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: nairn, UNITED KINGDOM
It was just to turn a bigger prop comfortably. Was looking for 12x7 to get some decent performance out of the verts, but ok. Cheers for all input guys.
#11
11,000 is very close to the revs usually turned with piped engines in CL stunt. An OS 40VF with a pipe at these revs (set at about 18" from the plug to the first baffle) is considered by the experts as having roughly the power of a muffled 60. In this application the pipe is boosting torque at around the peak of the torque curve which means you can turn a bigger prop. This is what was done with the old OS Hannos to make them turn a 12x12 prop (at even lower revs, something like 9,000). The other thing the pipe then does is if the engine tries to speed up when prop load decreases in a dive then it goes off the pipe and holds the revs more constant so it's a governing device as well.
#15
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: nairn, UNITED KINGDOM
ORIGINAL: Razor-RCU
Is the "piped-48" a K&B Screamin' 48? I love those...
Is the "piped-48" a K&B Screamin' 48? I love those...
Ok, (whispering) it's an mds. Shush, don't tell anyone.

ORIGINAL: Downunder
11,000 is very close to the revs usually turned with piped engines in CL stunt. An OS 40VF with a pipe at these revs (set at about 18" from the plug to the first baffle) is considered by the experts as having roughly the power of a muffled 60. In this application the pipe is boosting torque at around the peak of the torque curve which means you can turn a bigger prop. This is what was done with the old OS Hannos to make them turn a 12x12 prop (at even lower revs, something like 9,000). The other thing the pipe then does is if the engine tries to speed up when prop load decreases in a dive then it goes off the pipe and holds the revs more constant so it's a governing device as well.
11,000 is very close to the revs usually turned with piped engines in CL stunt. An OS 40VF with a pipe at these revs (set at about 18" from the plug to the first baffle) is considered by the experts as having roughly the power of a muffled 60. In this application the pipe is boosting torque at around the peak of the torque curve which means you can turn a bigger prop. This is what was done with the old OS Hannos to make them turn a 12x12 prop (at even lower revs, something like 9,000). The other thing the pipe then does is if the engine tries to speed up when prop load decreases in a dive then it goes off the pipe and holds the revs more constant so it's a governing device as well.
I know this plane flies much better on a 60, but I've already drilled the firewall for a 40 mount, and a pattern plane without a pipe is like pancakes without syrup.
ORIGINAL: w8ye
I've been waiting for you to say that. I read this in a magazine some 15 years ago but have never heard it repeated since.
I've thrown this theory up on here several times and no one ever responded good bad or ugly.
Thanks,
Jim
I've been waiting for you to say that. I read this in a magazine some 15 years ago but have never heard it repeated since.
I've thrown this theory up on here several times and no one ever responded good bad or ugly.
Thanks,
Jim
ORIGINAL: w8ye
Running at 11,000 you will not get enough from a pipe to make it worth the expense.
Running at 11,000 you will not get enough from a pipe to make it worth the expense.
I've already got a pipe to use so I'm just trying to use what I got.
Thanks again guys, this is a lot better than I could have hoped for. [8D]




