Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

Nexstar 4-stroke option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2006 | 05:37 PM
  #26  
skiman762's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nashville, NC
Default RE: Nexstar 4-stroke option?

Yeah what he said
Old 05-24-2006 | 10:46 PM
  #27  
sgillmore's Avatar
My Feedback: (50)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default RE: Nexstar 4-stroke option?

Well kh6oo--you asked!

Try to take it all with a grain of salt. Lots of different users + lots of different circumstances + lots of different performance requirements = lot of different opinions.

I have to add my support for the Magnums. In my experience, they're a great value for the money. Mine have all been easy to tune and run like champs on 15% Wildcat or 15% Omega fuel. Good performers and easy to maintain.

If it were me, I'd see how much weight it takes in nose to balance the plane. I'd then purchase either the Magnum XL-52RFS or XL-70RFS depending on which one is closer to the weight needed. I'd hate to install a Magnum .52 4-Stroke only to have to add 6 oz of dead weight to the nose to make it balance. Make sure you take the the spinner, prop, muffler and mounting bolts into account when figuring this out!

P.S. In all fairness, I've also had good luck with O.S., Saitos and Thunder Tigers. I believe all manufacturers have some good models/runs and eventually they all also turn out a lemon or two. I try not to get too religious about one brand or another.

That's my $.02
Old 05-25-2006 | 12:16 AM
  #28  
kh6oo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Flint, MI
Default RE: Nexstar 4-stroke option?

LOL, wow, looks like it blew up yesterday. haha. Thats ok, love all the responses and I think I will be looking into a Saito or YL 52. I get what a few of you are saying about 4stroke cost, but when I opened the post I mentioned I have one of those already that I "was" going to use in it, but kicking this idea around in stead. WHY, you ask? Becouse I want to play with it first and formost, with the added option to have a noob trainer in the hanger.

Thanks All
Tom
Old 05-25-2006 | 09:09 AM
  #29  
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Acworth, GA
Default RE: Nexstar 4-stroke option?

Ok I'll bite
what makes 4 stroke less reliable?
Valves, valve springs, push rods, valve adjustment, bearings. Not that they are not unreliable, just not quite as reliable as a two stroke. Though I think some may be defining user friendliness as reliablity. In the hands of an experianced user, both will will run, idle, and respond well.
Old 05-25-2006 | 10:26 AM
  #30  
skiman762's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nashville, NC
Default RE: Nexstar 4-stroke option?

Ok got that makes sense
yes anytime you add moving parts you risk failures

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.