Go Back  RCU Forums > Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums > Glow Engines
Engine selection based on aircraft weight >

Engine selection based on aircraft weight

Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

Engine selection based on aircraft weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2002 | 08:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Euless, TX
Default Engine selection based on aircraft weight

Is there anyplace someone can go to see what engine(s) are recommended/required for aircraft based on weight and use/abuse, i.e., full 3D vs just poking holes in the sky, etc.?

TIA
Old 10-11-2002 | 10:53 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: gone,
Default Engine selection based on aircraft weight

There's no good answer...

The weight of the plane is just one of many factors in engine selection.
Aircraft performance desired is important.
Structral integrity of the aircraft can limit the engine. (not good to have the engine pull the firewall out.)

Since you are looking for 3D performance... look at the expected finished weights of several kits, and look at thier engine recommendations. Note that for 3D sometimes the lighter bushing type engine will be used with a long low pitch prop, as top end rpm isn't a big deal, low airspeed and high thrust to weigh are what you want. Props are more efficient at lower rpm than what we commonly get out of engines such as the O.S. FX series. The weight savings of the bushing type can be a BIG 3D performance boost too. (reduced neeed for tail ballast... doubles the weight savings)
Old 10-14-2002 | 01:43 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Euless, TX
Default Engine selection based on aircraft weight

Thanks for the response. I obviously didn'y make myself very clear. I'm NOT into 3D, and not sure I ever want to be. I prefer more scale-like flight. In the case of a quarter scale sport bipe, that would include loops, rolls, hammerheads, tail slides, etc. 3D is not in my vocabulary. The idea of looking at a comparable kit is a good one, and one I hadn't thought of. Sometimes the obvious isn't obvious.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.